Anorthernsoul 1221 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 (edited) What does he bring to the team? Fuck all I'd say, we are a much better side with 2 proper strikers on the field. Edited October 3, 2010 by Anorthernsoul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 6 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 He's fairly physical and sits between the forwards and midfield. He's also handy on set pieces. If we had two strikers Id agree, but we don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anorthernsoul 1221 Posted October 3, 2010 Author Share Posted October 3, 2010 He's fairly physical and sits between the forwards and midfield. He's also handy on set pieces. If we had two strikers Id agree, but we don't. He goes missing for massive spells in games and when he does appear his first touch is like a baby rhino. I'd rather have two decent attacking options in games, either Carroll & Lovenkrands or give Ranger a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 6 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 He's fairly physical and sits between the forwards and midfield. He's also handy on set pieces. If we had two strikers Id agree, but we don't. He goes missing for massive spells in games and when he does appear his first touch is like a baby rhino. I'd rather have two decent attacking options in games, either Carroll & Lovenkrands or give Ranger a chance. ..and there is the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 Ameobi was fine today, him and Carroll are a far better option than a lone striker and 'the juggernaut'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinofbeans 91 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 Classic example of a player being slightly too good for the championship and not good enough for the prem. now that Ben Arfa is out for 4-6 months ( i'm guessing), we need another option. he's just not good enough at this level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 Classic example of a player being slightly too good for the championship and not good enough for the prem. now that Ben Arfa is out for 4-6 months ( i'm guessing), we need another option. he's just not good enough at this level. I wouldn't say he was too good for the championship. He did well last season but he didn't set the league on fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6785 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 Didnt he get Championship player of the season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 nope, Dorrans I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 He can score more than enough goals to be worth a place in the championship though as Luke said, goals apart he didn't set it alight, but in the prem in games when he misses his chance/chances then overall you've often played with 10 men and we can't afford that. Until his injury i'm sure we'd all have played Ben Arfa there ahead of Nolan, if you're not going for two strikers or we'd have played a striker off Carroll, certainly at home against the teams we've been losing to. Away from home Hughton hasn't been bad at all, good effort at Wolves, great display at Everton and but for a cheating cunt of a ref we might have had a draw or even a win today, so his tactics there aren't so bad, but at home we can't afford Nolan where he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TicTacWoe 0 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 wouldnt mind seeing someone like Vuckic given a chance to prove himself but it will never happen we've been way to cautious with younger players for years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Transfer 0 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 I don't blame Hughton for not wanting to take many risks with younger players, we're hardly a settled PL side. I'm sure they'll get more chances later in the season as the injuries mount up, and if/when we get a bit more comfortable in terms of our position in the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TicTacWoe 0 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 I don't blame Hughton for not wanting to take many risks with younger players, we're hardly a settled PL side. I'm sure they'll get more chances later in the season as the injuries mount up, and if/when we get a bit more comfortable in terms of our position in the table. Hope so but doubt it, reckon he'd just throw in Smith again if Nolan got injured or Lovenkrands etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinnieq 0 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 He's fairly physical and sits between the forwards and midfield. He's also handy on set pieces. If we had two strikers Id agree, but we don't. Ah ya, he's class on free-kicks, that thing he does where he's blocking the keeper... legend.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 He's fat, he's round, he bounces off the ground... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1260 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 Ameobi was fine today, him and Carroll are a far better option than a lone striker and 'the juggernaut'. No he wasn't he was fucking useless. I don't know if you were at the game or just watched it on the telly but everyone around me could see how his lack of movement was causing us massive problems going forward. He's unbelievably lazy more so than Robert ever was. The rest of the team were moving forward looking for a pass and he was just standing still. There's no was to pick out a pass to someone who's so easily marked. I don't know why Caroll didn't satrt but if he was fit, this was a major error by Hughton yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6785 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 I thought Shola held it up quite well. It was as though Nolan didnt fancy him to win anything so never gambled on any flick ons etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shackbleep 0 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 He's fat, he's round, he bounces off the ground... I guess it's a sign of my age that the next line in my head is "Micky Quinn, Micky Quinn". As for Nolan, I think the question should be "What is it he's doing to make sure he's included" rather than what he actually brings... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anorthernsoul 1221 Posted October 4, 2010 Author Share Posted October 4, 2010 He can score more than enough goals to be worth a place in the championship though as Luke said, goals apart he didn't set it alight, but in the prem in games when he misses his chance/chances then overall you've often played with 10 men and we can't afford that. Until his injury i'm sure we'd all have played Ben Arfa there ahead of Nolan, if you're not going for two strikers or we'd have played a striker off Carroll, certainly at home against the teams we've been losing to. Away from home Hughton hasn't been bad at all, good effort at Wolves, great display at Everton and but for a cheating cunt of a ref we might have had a draw or even a win today, so his tactics there aren't so bad, but at home we can't afford Nolan where he is. Agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 Anyone see the ball come towards Shola, 2nd half, and Kompany slide in to intercept, but missed. Shola's touch was so shit, that it then came to him, but it bounced off him and went back to Kompany. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1260 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 I thought Shola held it up quite well. It was as though Nolan didnt fancy him to win anything so never gambled on any flick ons etc. He did as long as the ball came straight to him from a clearance. The problem was he didn't offer any movement at all so when we were trying to build attacks we had nothing to aim for. Especially if we broke with any sort of pace as he was still lolloping around in the centre circle/our half when our midfielders/defenders were looking to play a striker in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolly Potter MD 0 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) Nolan occupying the final 1/3 compresses our attack, there's not enough wide/exchange passing play in the wide channels. It isolates our wingers, as too often they lack an 'inside outlet' [a simple passing option, a get out of jail card when under heavy defensive pressure]. Providing that consistent inside option is a pre-requiste of that floating/roaming forward role, epitomised by Bellamy. I'd rather Ranger in that role tbh, over Nolan that is, for the overall good of the team. His link-up play and technique are both solid, he has the athletic/physical attributes to play sideline-to-sideline and more importantly he keeps his head up while on the ball. He suits the wide workhorse type of role i speak of imo, with Vuckic slated in as Barton's possible replacement in the middle [over time]. It may well prove to be the ideal way to blood the lad over the short-mid term. It will allow Ranger to play with a bit more abandon/freedom, and being more of a workhorse in the final 1/3 there's less pressure of having to become a prolific striker straight away. Edited October 5, 2010 by Year Zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10972 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Nolan occupying the final 1/3 compresses our attack, there's not enough wide/exchange passing play in the wide channels. It isolates our wingers, as too often they lack an 'inside outlet' [a simple passing option, a get out of jail card when under heavy defensive pressure]. Providing that consistent inside option is a pre-requiste of that floating/roaming forward role, epitomised by Bellamy. I'd rather Ranger in that role tbh, over Nolan that is, for the overall good of the team. His link-up play and technique are both solid, he has the athletic/physical attributes to play sideline-to-sideline and more importantly he keeps his head up while on the ball. He suits the wide workhorse type of role i speak of imo, with Vuckic slated in as Barton's possible replacement in the middle [over time]. It may well prove to be the ideal way to blood the lad over the short-mid term. It will allow Ranger to play with a bit more abandon/freedom, and being more of a workhorse in the final 1/3 there's less pressure of having to become a prolific striker straight away. I agree with the sentiment, but think Ranger's an odd choice. I haven't seen anything that suggests he'd perform well in the role you describe, in short I don't think he's got a "footballing brain", the kind of viison you need from a player operating in that role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 7496 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 I'd say Vuckic over Ranger in that role. Vuckic looks decently quick, can score and a decent passer. A long term project obviously. Not sure what sort of role Ranger is best suited to to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3517 Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 I'd say Vuckic over Ranger in that role. Vuckic looks decently quick, can score and a decent passer. A long term project obviously. Not sure what sort of role Ranger is best suited to to be honest. I thought you watched the Chelsea match because he looked none of the above that game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now