Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 good doesn't always mean popular and popular doesn't always mean good... I can't understand how this simple idea isn't picked up by Thompers Popular does mean good. Take Coldplay for example, not my cup of tea personally, but I'd have to be a right arrogant cock to dismiss them as shit because i prefer alternatives ...Ahem Yeah, and you genuinely thought I meant literally? http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...mp;#entry793850 Leazes and the Irish boy in typical thick fuck fashion taking the carling post seriously. Jesus thats the 2nd time you've said this lately What? Completely different. You really are the thickest cunt alive, do you know that? You can take that literally btw, because I fucking mean it literally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? Well, the Nazi's were fairly popular at the time. I'd say there are as many "fans" of Fundamentalist Islam as there are fans of, say, N-Dubz so what is it ASM, how many people have to be fans of Rape before it's good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TicTacWoe 0 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? eh...theres quite a few muslims so yeah. Nazis were pretty big back in the day too, we're talking boyzone big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? eh...theres quite a few fundamentalist muslims so yeah. Nazis were pretty big back in the day too, we're talking boyzone big. FYP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? eh...theres quite a few muslims so yeah. Nazis were pretty big back in the day too, we're talking boyzone big. In which case they obviously thought it was good. Not in my personal opinion like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? eh...theres quite a few fundamentalist muslims so yeah. Nazis were pretty big back in the day too, we're talking boyzone big. FYP You being pedantic? Never! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? Well, the Nazi's were fairly popular at the time. I'd say there are as many "fans" of Fundamentalist Islam as there are fans of, say, N-Dubz so what is it ASM, how many people have to be fans of Rape before it's good? Rape isn't popular. Refer back to your previous definitions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So you're actually saying that the Nazis were good, based on the fact they were popular? Perfect. All further comments from you will forever be made null and void by this spectacular exposition of your stubborn idiocy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 So you're actually saying that the Nazis were good, based on the fact they were popular? Perfect. All further comments from you will forever be made null and void by this spectacular exposition of your stubborn idiocy They weren't popular Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) Rape isn't popular. Refer back to your previous definitions Oh, so if more people committed rape and made it more popular, it would become popular? Oh and The Nazis were popular, that's how they lead a country. Jesus, do you just not understand what Popular means? Edited October 15, 2010 by The Fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? Well, the Nazi's were fairly popular at the time. I'd say there are as many "fans" of Fundamentalist Islam as there are fans of, say, N-Dubz so what is it ASM, how many people have to be fans of Rape before it's good? Rape isn't popular. Refer back to your previous definitions Oh, so if more people committed rape and made it more popular, it would become popular? http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=...3c3be8adf7a9cd2 Web definitions for popular regarded with great favor, approval, or affection especially by the general public; "a popular tourist attraction"; "a popular girl"; "cabbage ... Referring to 'ifs' is a bit desperate fishy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13618 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 People thinking N-Dubz are good does not make them good. It makes the people thinking that retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 ok, so your stance is either, "All things that are popular are good" or that we think "Nothing popular is good" and neither of those statements are true. So what's popular that isn't good? where to start...? N-Dubz, being a chav, txt spk, Boyzone... N-Dubz fans think N-Dubz is good. Chavs think chavs are good. People who use txt spk think txt spk is good. Boyzone fans think Boyzone are good. So you're basically wrong, and expressing a personal opinion as fact. By that rationale Nazi's are good, Fundamentalist Muslims are good, Rape is good. None of those are particularly popular though are they? Well, the Nazi's were fairly popular at the time. I'd say there are as many "fans" of Fundamentalist Islam as there are fans of, say, N-Dubz so what is it ASM, how many people have to be fans of Rape before it's good? Rape isn't popular. Refer back to your previous definitions Oh, so if more people committed rape and made it more popular, it would become popular? If it was met with approval, especially by the general public, then yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 and by extension, good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 You're a desperate wanker fish, trying to be pedantic to disprove something that is clearly true. Fuck off you sad cunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 and by extension, good? Yes. But it would never be met with approval by the general public. So it's a pathetic way of being able to say OMG look ASM thinks rape is good if the public do. Honest, what a wanker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I'm just reducing your argument ad absurdum. nice that you've resorted to whiny name-calling though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I'm just reducing your argument ad absurdum. nice that you've resorted to whiny name-calling though. But you're not succeeding. Trying using a realistic example then I might take you more seriously. "But what if rape became acceptable to the public" Fucking have a word. Desperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Use a realistic scenario to reduce an argument to it's absurd conclusion? How the Hell would that work? Oh, and yes I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 Use a realistic scenario to reduce an argument to it's absurd conclusion? How the Hell would that work? Oh, and yes I am. How can you draw a realistic conclusion from an unrealistic scenario? Desperate. If N-Dubz have become successful and aren't good, why don't you mimic them and make a few million? Why not provide me with a real example of something popular and not good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I dispute that charity is good because what if the red cross started selling crack to kids, then would charity be good? [/fish] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I dispute that charity is good because what if the red cross started selling crack to kids, then would charity be good? [/fish] Don't quite get the Reducing an argument ad absurdum, do you? The point is to take your argument (popular=good) and following its implications logically to an absurd consequence. (Nazis were popular = Nazis were good) My point is not "anything popular= bad", it's simply that b doesn't always follow a. post hoc ergo propter hoc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I dispute that charity is good because what if the red cross started selling crack to kids, then would charity be good? [/fish] Don't quite get the Reducing an argument ad absurdum, do you? The point is to take your argument (popular=good) and following its implications logically to an absurd consequence. (Nazis were popular = Nazis were good) My point is not "anything popular= bad", it's simply that b doesn't always follow a. post hoc ergo propter hoc But the Nazis were considered good to the people who they were popular with. Christ on a bike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10441 Posted October 15, 2010 Share Posted October 15, 2010 I dispute that charity is good because what if the red cross started selling crack to kids, then would charity be good? [/fish] Don't quite get the Reducing an argument ad absurdum, do you? The point is to take your argument (popular=good) and following its implications logically to an absurd consequence. (Nazis were popular = Nazis were good) My point is not "anything popular= bad", it's simply that b doesn't always follow a. post hoc ergo propter hoc But the Nazis were considered good to the people who they were popular with. Christ on a bike Ok, I've spelled it out and you. still. don't. get. it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now