Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 The Transfer League Tables are a record of the amount of money spent in transfer fees by English Premier League Football Clubs since 1992. The table also shows new investment which club owners have made available to their club managers. The new investment can be seen season by season on the Club page from the Teams Transfer Menu. The "Purchased" column in this table shows the money spent on players in transfer fees by all the English Premier League clubs since the Premiership was formed in 1992. The "Sold" column shows the money received by the football club from the sale of players in the same period. In the Nett" column the total of transfer fees received from the sale of Players is subtracted from the total money spent in transfer fees on purchasing players since 1992. This Nett figure is the "new investment" made available each season to the manager to buy players. The "per season" column is the "Nett" total divided by the number of years that have passed since 1992 giving an average of the money spent in transfer fees by each premiership club each season since 1992. http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tab...92-to-2011.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4929 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 skewed by the ridiculous explosion in transfer fees in recent years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Expected us to be 5th best tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2010 Author Share Posted August 20, 2010 Handy list of our transfers per season on that site too. http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiershi...-transfers.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Arsenal man! Just fucking brilliant what they've done for that. Fair play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Interesting to see Birmingham so high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Sunderland £180m to be relegated a few times and finish 7th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon_Man 0 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Interesting website that, thank you for sharing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Citeh have been down in the old 3rd Division too during that period. Quality-fair play to them too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2010 Author Share Posted August 20, 2010 (edited) Interesting to see Birmingham so high. Indicative of how badly they've spent really. Possibly the worst return on investment of any club at just 40% (other than the clubs with new money). Leeds did better. Edited August 20, 2010 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 05/06 Owen, Luque and Emre is what fucked us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 05/06 Owen, Luque and Emre is what fucked us. Parker that summer too iirc. Better than the other 3 like, although it ended sourly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon_Man 0 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 I didn't think Emre was that bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Apart from the odd cracking goal he was canny shit I thought. On the rare occasion he was fit that is. A very poor buy by most standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon_Man 0 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 When he was fit he did quite well, apart from that, though, I agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 When he was fit he did quite well, apart from that, though, I agree with you. I'll have to disagree there. I thought he was finished and it showed. When he beat a man he couldn't get away from him any more and generally resorted to winning fouls. Scored a corker against the mackems like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Boro would have been 10th if they had stayed up! And how come Portsmouth went bankrupt?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 I didn't think Emre was that bad? All 3 were knocking on 30 All on Rolls Royce wages All 3 inj prone Emre the mind boggles was the last what I'd term a creative mf we had. But a 1 good game in 5 merchant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon_Man 0 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 He was capable of a few great goals. He is still plodding away at Fenerbache though. Luque was shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Emre is only 29 now man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Boro would have been 10th if they had stayed up! And how come Portsmouth went bankrupt?! Wages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 When he was fit he did quite well, apart from that, though, I agree with you. I'll have to disagree there. I thought he was finished and it showed. When he beat a man he couldn't get away from him any more and generally resorted to winning fouls. Scored a corker against the mackems like. Yup. Souness and then Big Sam wasted about 8om between them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Boro would have been 10th if they had stayed up! And how come Portsmouth went bankrupt?! Wages probably had something to do with it, along with shit ownership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 (edited) Boro would have been 10th if they had stayed up! And how come Portsmouth went bankrupt?! Wages Happy Harry. Edited August 20, 2010 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2010 Author Share Posted August 20, 2010 And how come Portsmouth went bankrupt?! Agents taking 40 percent of the fee. Return on investment as a percentage.... Blackpool 125 Pompey 118 West Ham 99 Leeds 97 Blackburn 94 Wigan 93 Arse 86 Burnley 81 Bolton 76 Everton 74 Man U 68 Newcastle 64 Boro 62 WBA 59 Liverpool 53 Spurs 52 Villa 52 Mackems 47 Hull 47 Wolves 46 Birmingham 42 Fulham 41 Stoke 40 Chelsea 34 Man City 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now