Happy Face 29 Posted October 20, 2016 Author Share Posted October 20, 2016 Podesta sent Obama an attachment called "women.doc" The rascals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 (edited) https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/19128 This one shows a decent level of analysis going on.... Edited October 20, 2016 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 21, 2016 Author Share Posted October 21, 2016 Possibly the funniest revelation in the entire election cycle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 Most likely a temporary password? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 Did they hack his personal email as well as his campaign email? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 21, 2016 Author Share Posted October 21, 2016 Most likely a temporary password? Maybe. The full email doesn't suggest it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35881 Posted October 21, 2016 Share Posted October 21, 2016 'Pissword' would've been better. Like the copper off 'Allo 'Allo uses for his Gmail account Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Possibly the funniest revelation in the entire election cycle. That can't be real, can it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 22, 2016 Author Share Posted October 22, 2016 This isn't really a dig at Clinton. Her policy is to overturn citizens united. Still, the matter of fact acceptance of the fact in an email while Clinton hammers Trump for questioning democracy in the US is noteworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26449#efmAF6AMV Could go in the election thread, but is a leaked email so putting it here. It's spot on insight and over a year old. With this well recognised fact, it's remarkable the Clinton campaign ignore it completely and still has surrogates in the DNC fighting dirty for her and having to resign, providing questions for the debate, tarnishing any opponents as Putin stooges etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5527 Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 Depends if you considering tweeting about it to be the same as actually releasing it. Wikileaks has presumably released the files overnight or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 24, 2016 Author Share Posted October 24, 2016 Depends if you considering tweeting about it to be the same as actually releasing it. Wikileaks has presumably released the files overnight or something. All their tweets link to the mails referred to. They've been doing nightly dumps for a fortnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 25, 2016 Author Share Posted October 25, 2016 "it looks like POTUS just said he found out HRC was using her personal email when he saw it in the news." "we need to clean this up - he has emails from her - they do not say state.gov" https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31077#efmAAGABT Pwoppa Nawty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Still waiting on an email worth caring about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 25, 2016 Author Share Posted October 25, 2016 BBC care enough to make it their top story. Lying presidents aren't newsworthy like they were in Nixon's day. Lower standards I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22346 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 BBC care enough to make it their top story. Lying presidents aren't newsworthy like they were in Nixon's day. Lower standards I guess. I couldn't find it anywhere on the App (didn't search). Are you comparing anything Hillary has done with Watergate? You're getting more silly by the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5527 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 I'll just drop this from the Guardian about Elizabeth Warren and how much better it could have been than Clinton... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/25/elizabeth-warren-us-president-workers-rights-wall-street Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2016 Author Share Posted October 26, 2016 I couldn't find it anywhere on the App (didn't search). Are you comparing anything Hillary has done with Watergate? You're getting more silly by the day. Just like the Clinton campaign http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-campaign-compares-podesta-email-hacks-to-watergate/article/2604645 No though, I was comparing Obama, not Clinton. Obviously Obama's wanst as bad, he's been lying to cover for Clinton's fuck up. Nixon lied to cover his own wrong doing. You will have selected which sections to appear in which order on your app. So you're curating the news yourself on there. At the BBC website, where news editors decide what is newsworthy, the podesta mails are currently the top banner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Where's the evidence that Obama lied? It's hardly inconceivable that he'll only noticed her name and not the domain address on her emails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 And the section on the BBC website you're referring to isn't necessarily their top story. It's normally reserved for a general interest piece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22346 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 And the section on the BBC website you're referring to isn't necessarily their top story. It's normally reserved for a general interest piece. No doubt it's the headline of RT though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2016 Author Share Posted October 26, 2016 Where's the evidence that Obama lied? It's hardly inconceivable that he'll only noticed her name and not the domain address on her emails. Then he's incompetent. People generally look at who a mail is from before opening it. If a colleague was sending a load of work stuff via gmail I'd have to sort it or escalate to security. And I don't handle anything classified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 26, 2016 Author Share Posted October 26, 2016 And the section on the BBC website you're referring to isn't necessarily their top story. It's normally reserved for a general interest piece. I'm happy to agree that it's in the public interest without being earth shattering enough to displace a president or presidential candidate. For me, while I think the couple of dozen stories that have come from thousands of mails are all well worth reporting and have importance with regards to how we perceive leaders, more important than that is the fact that Clinton opposes encryption which could have protected her mails from the Russians, Anonymous, Trump or whoever else she thinks stole them. If we're comparing to watergate, it's like her campaign left the door of the room open with a sign above saying "Clinton emails in here" so anyone nefarious could walk in and take them. Nothing was stolen was kept under lock and key. As a result the Clinton campaign has taken to using signal to ensure their communications are encrypted, but Clinton still hasn't publicly endorsed encryption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Since when has Clinton opposed encryption? I thought she opposed forcing tech companies to create back doors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31474 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Having read the BBC's article and all 16 of the 'juciest' leaks it's nearly impossible to be outraged by any of them. As far as presidential campaigns go this seems to be incredibly clean. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37639370 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now