Park Life 71 Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 (edited) "Several months ago, we told you that a Ridley Scott-produced Alien prequel was on the way and that the film was to be directed by Scott protege, Carl Rinsch. Well, Great Scott! That is no longer the case. In space, no one can hear you scream, but it would appear that the 20th Century Fox finally heard fans of the Alien franchise because they have now hired original Alien director Ridley Scott to return to the helm for the next installment of the long-running sci-fi franchise. The long-rumored sequel reboot prequel has been gestating since 1997′s Alien Resurrection (even with the Alien Vs Predator films being produced). Scott has often publicly pondered returning to the series, but only with original star Sigourney Weaver. However, this new movie is supposed to be a prequel to Scott’s own film and not a continuation of the series, so it would appear that Weaver won’t be involved - having said that, she recently re-teamed with her Aliens director, James Cameron, for Avatar, so never say never. The original Alien followed the crew of the Nostromo as they responded to a distress signal from a ship on a distant planet (LV428). Once there, a member of the crew is attacked and an alien parasite (a face-hugger) is attached to his face. Soon the creature dies, but then the real horror begins… Alien and its first sequel Alien are modern science fiction classics and even the lesser sequels (David Fincher’s Alien 3 and Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s Resurrection) have some interesting visual flourishes and plot developments." Have high hopes of this living upto the original two Alien films. Just been reading the unmade version of the Alien 3 script which shows there are just so many dierections left unchartered by this franchise. Edited July 19, 2010 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6936 Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Have high hopes of this living upto the original two Alien films. Just been reading the unmade version of the Alien 3 script which shows there are just so many dierections left unchartered by this franchise. This interests me. Do you have a link or care to fill us in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Castell 0 Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Hollywood must be really struggling for ideas if the blockbusters are reheated scraps from the carcasses of old horror films, 80's TV shows, old films and fanboy wankfests of old franchises (i.e. Alien vs. Predator). Oh, and shit versions of Korean and Japanese films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 Have high hopes of this living upto the original two Alien films. Just been reading the unmade version of the Alien 3 script which shows there are just so many dierections left unchartered by this franchise. This interests me. Do you have a link or care to fill us in? It's the William Gibson version that was never made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 Hollywood must be really struggling for ideas if the blockbusters are reheated scraps from the carcasses of old horror films, 80's TV shows, old films and fanboy wankfests of old franchises (i.e. Alien vs. Predator). Oh, and shit versions of Korean and Japanese films. Well the golden era of Hollywood was informed by much foreign talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 It isn't overstating things to say that Ridley Scott is among the greatest filmmakers of all time, and "Alien" is among the greatest films of all time. So how could anyone not be eager to learn every little detail about his prequel to the 1979 classic? On Thursday (April 22), we caught up with the "Robin Hood" director to speak with him for next week's MTV Summer Movie Preview. And when he mentioned that he was feasting his eyes upon the latest "Untitled 'Alien' Prequel" script pages, we couldn't help but ask some questions. What followed might be the most revealing interview Sir Ridley has given thus far on the top-secret project. Read on for exclusive details concerning the prequel's plot, creature design and the woman — not named Sigourney Weaver — who will soon be kicking alien ass: MTV: We're very excited about your return to the "Aliens" world — what's going on with it at this point? Ridley Scott: As we speak, I've got a pile of pages next to me; it's like the fourth draft. It's a work in progress, but we're not dreaming it up anymore. We know what the story is. We're now actually trying to improve the three acts and make the characters better, build it up to something [we can shoot]. It's a work in progress, but we're actually making the film. There's no question about it, we're going to make the film. MTV Imagines The Kick-Ass Stars Of An 'Alien' Prequel MTV: Awesome. Scott: Now it's a matter of, how good can I get the screenplay in the next few weeks so I can get a good ballpark figure of what it will cost. I've already got people working graphically on designs for the various requirements of the film. MTV: Since this is a prequel, will you need to make the ships more primitive-looking than in "Alien"? Scott: It's set in 2085, about 30 years before Sigourney [Weaver's character Ellen Ripley]. It's fundamentally about going out to find out 'Who the hell was that Space Jockey?' The guy who was sitting in the chair in the alien vehicle — there was a giant fellow sitting in a seat on what looked to be either a piece of technology or an astronomer's chair. Remember that? MTV: Of course. Scott: And our man [Tom Skerritt as Captain Dallas] climbs up and says "There's been an explosion in his chest from the inside out — what was that?" I'm basically explaining who that Space Jockey — we call him the Space Jockey — I'm explaining who the space jockeys were. MTV: And is the Weyland-Yutani company in existence at this point? Scott: It's Weyland. Weyland hasn't joined Yutani yet, so they go and see Weyland. [The film] is about the discussion of terraforming — taking planets and planetoids and balls of earth and trying to terraform, seed them with the possibilities of future life. MTV: We know how obsessive "Alien" fans can get. Are you going to make a film that doesn't require having seen any of the other movies? Scott: Totally. Yes. [People will still get it], because there's a lot of copying, dude. MTV: There's a lot of copying of your movies. Scott: There's a lot of homage. Is that the polite word? Homage? I call it something else. [Laughs.] MTV: Will Sigourney Weaver have any participation at all? Scott: It will be before she was born! MTV: So not even a voice-over, explaining things? Nothing? Scott: Well, the main character [in the prequel] will be a woman, yeah. We're thinking it could go down that route, yeah. When I started the original "Alien," Ripley wasn't a woman, it was a guy. During casting, we thought, "Why don't we make it a woman?" MTV: So will you be creating new aliens for your prequel? Scott: What you have to do is — were there four or five "Alien" films? I can't remember how many followed. MTV: There were three after you, then the "Alien vs. Predator" nonsense. Scott: Yeah, the thing about "Alien vs. Predator" is, I know it's commerce, but what a pity. I think, therefore, I have to design — or redesign — earlier versions of what these elements are that led to the thing you finally see in "Alien," which is the thing that catapults out of the egg, the face-hugger. MTV: OK. Scott: I don't want to repeat it. The alien in a sense, as a shape, is worn out. MTV: Will you consult the original alien designer, H.R. Giger, on these ideas? Scott: Yeah, he's still around. Once I get more serious and get going, and the big wheels start turning, we'll certainly talk. And maybe we'll come up with something completely different. MTV: In your mind, when do cameras begin rolling on the film? Scott: We're hoping to have it in theaters in late 2011, or maybe the best date in 2012. MTV: Have you given any thought on how you'll feel when you walk on set that first time, how you'll deal with the déjà vu from 1979? Scott: Yeah, it'll be weird, because I always said I'll never do a sequel. [Laughs.] MTV: What made you change your mind? Scott: Honestly? They've squeezed the franchise dry. The first one will always be the most frightening, because the beast we put together with Giger and all its parts — the face-hugger, the chest-burster, the egg — they were all totally original, and that's hard to follow. ... I've always avoided sequels, unless I felt there was something fresh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now