Jump to content

Calls for Pope to be put on trial


trophyshy
 Share

Recommended Posts

At the end of the day, anyone who believes that a human can't make errors in their job is a fool. That goes for the pope and also those who wrote the bibles.

 

As a slight point of order, the Pope is only infallible when he addresses something in an encyclical letter which is very rare - his day to day hate speech is his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The queen doesn't actually have any power to mobilise her army....not like the Pope and his war on The Golden Compass. :razz:

 

Mi5 and 6 swear oaths to the crown tho don't they?

 

I think the armed forces do and until recently MPs did - the latter always made me reluctant to accept the UK as a true democracy because it meant someone like me who would never swear an oath wouldn't be able to be an MP (although I realise the Sinn Fein ones did so on a limited basis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The queen doesn't actually have any power to mobilise her army....not like the Pope and his war on The Golden Compass. :razz:

 

Mi5 and 6 swear oaths to the crown tho don't they?

 

I think the armed forces do and until recently MPs did - the latter always made me reluctant to accept the UK as a true democracy because it meant someone like me who would never swear an oath wouldn't be able to be an MP (although I realise the Sinn Fein ones did so on a limited basis).

 

Have they changed the rules on MPs swearing an oath of allegiance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have they changed the rules on MPs swearing an oath of allegiance?

 

I'd assumed so because I remember reading something about Adams and McGuinness being able to be "full" MPs whereas previously they'd just been provided with office facilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They still haven't accepted their seats in parliament, there was a ruling that they were allowed full entitlement to expenses and office facilities, not sure if that was what you read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
It was meant to be the document that put a lid on the clerical sex abuse scandals that have swept the Roman Catholic world. But instead of quelling fury from within and without the church, the Vatican stoked the anger of liberal Catholics and women's groups by including a provision in its revised decree that made the "attempted ordination" of women one of the gravest crimes in ecclesiastical law.

 

The change put the "offence" on a par with the sex abuse of minors.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/1...ion-grave-crime

 

:jesuswept:

 

Are these for real?

 

Allowing women to read their fantasy novel is as bad as buggering a 5 year old?

 

Sometimes I want to chew a brick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was meant to be the document that put a lid on the clerical sex abuse scandals that have swept the Roman Catholic world. But instead of quelling fury from within and without the church, the Vatican stoked the anger of liberal Catholics and women's groups by including a provision in its revised decree that made the "attempted ordination" of women one of the gravest crimes in ecclesiastical law.

 

The change put the "offence" on a par with the sex abuse of minors.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/1...ion-grave-crime

 

:jesuswept:

 

Are these for real?

 

Allowing women to read their fantasy novel is as bad as buggering a 5 year old?

 

Sometimes I want to chew a brick.

 

Not just read HF, read out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was meant to be the document that put a lid on the clerical sex abuse scandals that have swept the Roman Catholic world. But instead of quelling fury from within and without the church, the Vatican stoked the anger of liberal Catholics and women's groups by including a provision in its revised decree that made the "attempted ordination" of women one of the gravest crimes in ecclesiastical law.

 

The change put the "offence" on a par with the sex abuse of minors.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/1...ion-grave-crime

 

:jesuswept:

 

Are these for real?

 

Allowing women to read their fantasy novel is as bad as buggering a 5 year old?

 

Sometimes I want to chew a brick.

 

Not just read HF, read out loud.

 

Oops. Aye, that's what I meant. Read it out loud from behind a lectern.

 

Must make catholics wretch to think of girl on lectern action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny that they are still able to shoot themselves in the foot so easily while "honestly" sticking to their principles.

 

Brown in the Guardian pointed out that there are two sides to their laws - moral and sacramental so while child abuse is covered by moral law, things like breaking the confidentiality of confession and in this case ordaining women are "crimes" against procedure more than anything.

 

The mistake comes in equating these crimes which leads to the obvious headlines.

 

As I've said before I relish every fuck-up they make as it hastens their downfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.