General Election 2010

[Problem Child 0]

What pisses me off, is the "ooh we've got to make sure the markets are happy" merchants (who've already been on the box) In other words our economy and wellbeing is at the whim of the same few cunts (and institutions of cunts) who throw billions of pretendy £££'s $$$'s yen etc around.

 

It's fundamentaly fucking shite.

It certainly is.

[Park Life 71]

What pisses me off, is the "ooh we've got to make sure the markets are happy" merchants (who've already been on the box) In other words our economy and wellbeing is at the whim of the same few cunts (and institutions of cunts) who throw billions of pretendy £££'s $$$'s yen etc around.

 

It's fundamentaly fucking shite.

It certainly is.

 

+1

[Happy Face 29]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

If that's the case it's a monstrous kick in the nads for Labour

Not really. After fifteen years of the last Tory government the electorate deserted them in huge numbers and Blair came to power with a 100 plus majority. Either Labour have done a far better job than the last tory government, or Cameron has provided an unpalatable alternative.

 

Labour under Blair offered fundamental change in their approach to politics having learned the lesson of '92 when they failed worse than the Tories have here. New Labour was a marketing push that sold the notion of a more centrist Labour option that was far more palatable to floating voters.

 

Cameron has done nowt in this election but say "what's your fucking alternative?" and sit back with a snide face on assuming people would flock from Labour. They are no different to what they were in the 80s/90s so why would the electorate choose to go back to that?

 

Depends how you look at it though, Cameron's been a disgrace if the most important thing is to take power, but if sticking to party principals is more important then he might have JUST stolen it and managed to do so. The base will love him for that wheras the Labour socialists were outraged with Blair.

Edited May 7, 2010 by Happy Face

[1892 0]

Two seats left to call (admittedly one waiting for a by-election) and both are Tory defences. If they successfully keep them then the numbers will be:

 

Con 307

Lab 258

LD 57

Others 28

 

When you consider the exit poll at 10pm last night was the following, they were bloody accurate:

 

Con 307

Lab 255

LD 59

Others 29

 

Conspiracy!

[Craig 6700]

What pisses me off, is the "ooh we've got to make sure the markets are happy" merchants (who've already been on the box) In other words our economy and wellbeing is at the whim of the same few cunts (and institutions of cunts) who throw billions of pretendy £££'s $$$'s yen etc around.

 

It's fundamentaly fucking shite.

It certainly is.

 

+1

 

The same few tossers who got us into the sorry mess in the first place

[Problem Child 0]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

If that's the case it's a monstrous kick in the nads for Labour

Not really. After fifteen years of the last Tory government the electorate deserted them in huge numbers and Blair came to power with a 100 plus majority. Either Labour have done a far better job than the last tory government, or Cameron has provided an unpalatable alternative.

 

Labour under Blair offered fundamental change in their approach to politics having learned the lesson of '92 when they failed worse than the Tories have here. New Labour was a marketing push that sold the notion of a more centrist Labour option that was far more palatable to floating voters.

 

Cameron has done nowt in this election but say "what's your fucking alternative?" and sit back with a snide face on assuming people would flock from Labour. They are no different to what they were in the 80s/90s so why would the electorate choose to go back to that?

 

Depends how you look at it though, Cameron's been a disgrace if the most important thing is to take power, but if sticking to party principals is more important then he might have JUST stolen it and managed to do so. The base will love him for that wheras the Labour socialists were outraged with Blair.

I look at this way. This should have been was one of the easiest elections for an opposition to win in 30 years, but Cameron has failed miserably. It doesn’t bode well for his ability to run the country if he gets his hands on power.

[Park Life 71]

Agreed it was a disaster for Cameron, should have been a walk in the park.

[Toonpack 9973]

What pisses me off, is the "ooh we've got to make sure the markets are happy" merchants (who've already been on the box) In other words our economy and wellbeing is at the whim of the same few cunts (and institutions of cunts) who throw billions of pretendy £££'s $$$'s yen etc around.

 

It's fundamentaly fucking shite.

It certainly is.

 

+1

 

The same few tossers who got us into the sorry mess in the first place

 

 

Aye but it's not a real mess is it, it's a mythical mess perpetuated for gain (by a very few)

 

Just been a graph on sky of the £, up and down like a whores drawers, now back up again (over the space of a few hours) some cunts made a fortune

[Renton 22004]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).

 

So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

Edited May 7, 2010 by Renton

[Christmas Tree 4839]

Prime Minister Cameron

Chancellor Osbourne

Foreign Secretary Hague

 

and Ken Clarke......

 

God it sounds good!

 

The boys are back I'm town, the boys are back in town....

[Park Life 71]

What pisses me off, is the "ooh we've got to make sure the markets are happy" merchants (who've already been on the box) In other words our economy and wellbeing is at the whim of the same few cunts (and institutions of cunts) who throw billions of pretendy £££'s $$$'s yen etc around.

 

It's fundamentaly fucking shite.

It certainly is.

 

+1

 

The same few tossers who got us into the sorry mess in the first place

 

 

Aye but it's not a real mess is it, it's a mythical mess perpetuated for gain (by a very few)

 

Just been a graph on sky of the £, up and down like a whores drawers, now back up again (over the space of a few hours) some cunts made a fortune

 

[Park Life 71]

Prime Minister Cameron

Chancellor Osbourne

Foreign Secretary Hague

 

and Ken Clarke......

 

God it sounds good!

 

The boys are back I'm town, the boys are back in town....

 

On crack?

 

This my dear was the Tories last chance under this system for power ever. Once the sys changes its over for the stock market lapdogs.

[Renton 22004]

Prime Minister Cameron

Chancellor Osbourne

Foreign Secretary Hague

 

and Ken Clarke......

 

God it sounds good!

 

The boys are back I'm town, the boys are back in town....

 

Is Ken going to make the tea?

 

One thing is clear to just about everyone CT is that no one has come out of this well, not least the British public, the UK plc, and the North East of England (who have unanimously given the tories a kicking once again and will be made to suffer for it if you have your way). So I find you're misinformed gloating even more nauseating than normal - seriously man, what do you get out of it?

[Gemmill 46064]

Don't bite Rentaghost!

[Renton 22004]

Don't bite Rentaghost!

 

Can't...

 

help....

 

it......

 

 

Cunters!

[Toonpack 9973]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

[Andrew 4863]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

[Toonpack 9973]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

 

It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead

[Andrew 4863]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

 

It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead

youre the cunt who'd rather have the BNP in power than labour

 

dickhead

[Renton 22004]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

 

It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead

 

Who did you vote for?

[Toonpack 9973]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

 

It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead

 

Who did you vote for?

 

Tynemouth tory-boy

[Toonpack 9973]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

 

It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead

youre the cunt who'd rather have the BNP in power than labour

 

dickhead

 

 

No, re-read my follow up post for fuck's sake. The question was not about Labour or BNP it was about the bongeye

[LeazesMag 0]

Prime Minister Cameron

Chancellor Osbourne

Foreign Secretary Hague

 

and Ken Clarke......

 

God it sounds good!

 

The boys are back I'm town, the boys are back in town....

 

On crack?

 

This my dear was the Tories last chance under this system for power ever. Once the sys changes its over for the stock market lapdogs.

 

exactly. And the Lib Dems should insist on major seats in the cabinet too as well as the reform of the system.

[Renton 22004]

36% of the country think like CT though alex.

To be accurate it’s 36% of the half the electorate, which is about 18% of the country. It's hardly the ringing endorsement Cameron is making it out to be.

 

After 15 years of any government and an election in the midst of a global financial meltdown the opposition would normally stroll to a majority. This result really is a bit of an embarrassment for the Conservatives.

 

From what I can see, the share of the vote is this:

 

Con 39.1%

Lab 30.3%

LD 22.5%

Others 8%

 

Going by your figures of half (wasn't the turnout much higher than that?) Then we can deduce that around 20% of the country backed Cameron, 15% backed Brown and 11% backed Clegg.

 

Ringing endorsment or not, it's clear the country as a whole preferred the idea of Cameron to Brown.

 

Don't know where you have got those figures but the Beeb says CON 36.1%, LAB 29.0%, and LIB 23.0%. So not much more than 1 in 3 people who voted went for the Conservatives. I'd say that of the one third of people who did not vote for Conservatives or Labour, most of them would prefer to continue with Brown than have Cameron - especially those who voted Lib Dems (please feel free to disagree -I'd be interested).So I don't see how Cameron thinks he has any sort of mandate, he's basically taking the piss. Trouble is, Brown clearly has no mandate either. We need a re-election but who has the stomach for that, and what if the same thing happens again?

 

That's a stretch of imense proportions. I'd rather have Griffin than the saggy faced bongeyed cunt

 

then you're a bigger cunt than he is

 

It was an illustrative (but exagerated) point, dickhead

 

Who did you vote for?

 

Tynemouth tory-boy

 

Right, not liberal then. Commiserations btw.

 

Point is, most Liberal voters are left-slanting, not right. In fact probably left of Labour nowadays. So put yourself in their shoes, who would they prefer in power if they had to choose between Brown and Cameron?

 

Meenzer can probably give a definite answer to that.

[Christmas Tree 4839]

Don't bite Rentaghost!

 

 

If at first you don't succeed......