Guest alex Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I expect the delay whilst waiting for their approval will be used to edit some of your posts in the thread. A little dickie bird told me something last week which suggests Craig is telling the truth about it being fairly unanimous and something that's been building for a while tbf to him. Fair enough, but there's only one of them loving the opportunity to patronise the board members on the issue. I think he just takes it to heart tbh. Plus, you're basically calling him a liar with nothing to back that up. You'd defend yourself too, wouldn't you if the positions were reversed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I expect the delay whilst waiting for their approval will be used to edit some of your posts in the thread. If you have that opinion then there's no point doing it as if you don't see what you want to see you'll claim it's been tampered with anyway (it won't be). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Youve answered the criticism by dodging bullets. You wont name names or say specific instances.. Why should I hang people out to dry simply to satisfy your whim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I expect the delay whilst waiting for their approval will be used to edit some of your posts in the thread. A little dickie bird told me something last week which suggests Craig is telling the truth about it being fairly unanimous and something that's been building for a while tbf to him. Fair enough, but there's only one of them loving the opportunity to patronise the board members on the issue. I think he just takes it to heart tbh. Plus, you're basically calling him a liar with nothing to back that up. You'd defend yourself too, wouldn't you if the positions were reversed? It was his "about your level" comment in reply to Stevie's post that got up my nose tbh. I just thought 'who does this lad think he is?'. It's not the first time he's come across as a bit of a nob either tbf but I'm not going to elaborate or I'll probably end up on the naughty step with Stevie. As for defending himself, he's not doing such a good job of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I expect the delay whilst waiting for their approval will be used to edit some of your posts in the thread. A little dickie bird told me something last week which suggests Craig is telling the truth about it being fairly unanimous and something that's been building for a while tbf to him. Fair enough, but there's only one of them loving the opportunity to patronise the board members on the issue. I think he just takes it to heart tbh. Plus, you're basically calling him a liar with nothing to back that up. You'd defend yourself too, wouldn't you if the positions were reversed? Thanks Alex. As for the others, theres no patronising going on, I'm merely trying to explain what's gone on and why without going into unnecessary detail. The others haven't on account that most aren't on here at the moment and those that are are probably seeing the backlash that's happening and can't be arsed with it - I don't blame them either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I expect the delay whilst waiting for their approval will be used to edit some of your posts in the thread. A little dickie bird told me something last week which suggests Craig is telling the truth about it being fairly unanimous and something that's been building for a while tbf to him. Fair enough, but there's only one of them loving the opportunity to patronise the board members on the issue. I think he just takes it to heart tbh. Plus, you're basically calling him a liar with nothing to back that up. You'd defend yourself too, wouldn't you if the positions were reversed? Thanks Alex. As for the others, theres no patronising going on, I'm merely trying to explain what's gone on and why without going into unnecessary detail. The others haven't on account that most aren't on here at the moment and those that are are probably seeing the backlash that's happening and can't be arsed with it - I don't blame them either. if people want to run their own forum with the own rules then they can do so otherwise STFU Come back when've caught up with everything son... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4774 Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose Won't happen imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaMoUsE 0 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose funny that andrew cos ive heard you whinge about ashley numerous times. Ill have to point this out to you next time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4774 Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 right, thats totally the same situation in fact its actually more like what you're doing than what I am you're the ones moaning about the owners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) I expect the delay whilst waiting for their approval will be used to edit some of your posts in the thread. If you have that opinion then there's no point doing it as if you don't see what you want to see you'll claim it's been tampered with anyway (it won't be). Wouldn't be the first time tbh Edited February 11, 2010 by Sima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose funny that andrew cos ive heard you whinge about ashley numerous times. Ill have to point this out to you next time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 877 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 It's not as though I know the whole story here, but here's my two cents anyway. Stevie, I think, is a fundamentally decent person who unfortunately holds a lot of uninformed views and likes to spout forth a lot of rude and ignorant shit about topics he knows little to nothing about. If that were ban-worthy I think there's a fair amount of people on here who'd be banned. If only he could have just learned to tone down his tirades and to keep the open and base bigotry and, yes, racism out of his posts, he could've continued to be a valuable contributing member of this board, since he has a lot to share about football (well, English football anyway). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose Won't happen imo You're correct. We've had at least one say they're not happy for it so that's the end of that idea. Time to accept and move on... Oh and Sima - can you expand on that claim please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4774 Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 It's not as though I know the whole story here, but here's my two cents anyway. Stevie, I think, is a fundamentally decent person who unfortunately holds a lot of uninformed views and likes to spout forth a lot of rude and ignorant shit about topics he knows little to nothing about. If that were ban-worthy I think there's a fair amount of people on here who'd be banned. If only he could have just learned to tone down his tirades and to keep the open and base bigotry and, yes, racism out of his posts, he could've continued to be a valuable contributing member of this board, since he has a lot to share about football (well, English football anyway). you're probably right, he couldn't though despite numerous warnings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose Won't happen imo You're correct. We've had at least one say they're not happy for it so that's the end of that idea. Time to accept and move on... Oh and Sima - can you expand on that claim please? Why because you're so above us you are instructing us to do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Oh and quelle surprise... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose Won't happen imo You're correct. We've had at least one say they're not happy for it so that's the end of that idea. Time to accept and move on... Oh and Sima - can you expand on that claim please? Why because you're so above us you are instructing us to do this? No because it's not going to change anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Expand on posts being altered? Such as the raft of posts that got deleted from the Keegan thread a while back. Just like here..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4774 Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) you tits, look in general chat insider with a quick convenient edit there Edited February 11, 2010 by Andrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 bloody hell internet is serious business, craigs actually accepted the idea of moving the thread and you're still not happy? look at how many times stevie has been warned, time and again but hes never accepted it its a forum, which is paid for by a few members, its owned by them its not a democracy the authority is between them and whosoever they should choose Won't happen imo You're correct. We've had at least one say they're not happy for it so that's the end of that idea. Time to accept and move on... Oh and Sima - can you expand on that claim please? Why because you're so above us you are instructing us to do this? No because it's not going to change anything. So is there going to be a specific explanation then for the banning, with examples, for the benefit of the members or is "it was a unanimous decision" going to have to suffice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Expand on posts being altered? Such as the raft of posts that got deleted from the Keegan thread a while back. Just like here..... I can't wait to hear you expand further on this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottish Mag 3 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 So is there going to be a specific explanation then for the banning Nope... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insider Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 So is there going to be a specific explanation then for the banning Nope... Alright then. Rest my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Expand on posts being altered? Such as the raft of posts that got deleted from the Keegan thread a while back. Just like here..... I can't wait to hear you expand further on this one http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...0&start=120 Posts were deleted from this thread Strange how it is thought of being the most entertaining thread of the day when there was "nothing" posted on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts