Happy Face 29 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 (edited) Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. Edited February 9, 2010 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. well, I'm not bothered like....... in fact, you are totally wrong, the blowing up of innocent people is a terrible business and has no justification in any form but the shooting of the scumbags before they do it would be celebrated wildly. The shame is, in any terrorist attack, victims will include people who defended the bombers "rights" etc etc....too late for them though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. well, I'm not bothered like....... in fact, you are totally wrong, the blowing up of innocent people is a terrible business and has no justification in any form but the shooting of the scumbags before they do it would be celebrated wildly. The shame is, in any terrorist attack, victims will include people who defended the bombers "rights" etc etc....too late for them though. So you prefer shooting innocent people...like Menezes...to bombing them...like hundreds of thousands in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. Why do you see shooting innocent people with bullets as something to celebrate any more than bombing them? Do you gladly accept that you could be shot dead on the metro like Menezes was, because your 'rights' are less important than restricting the rights of criminals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 This is getting complicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 (edited) This is getting complicated. The contradictions do weave a tangled web don't they? On the one hand Leazes doesn't like to think of victims of an attack including people who have defended England's due process "rights" that have been enshrined in law for centuries. To resolve this he's insisting those laws be scrapped so the police have the right (actually, so they're compelled) to shoot innocent people (including him) in the face without any evidence or due process. As long as it's white policemen shooting innocent brown people eh Leazes? Edited February 9, 2010 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9303 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. well, I'm not bothered like....... in fact, you are totally wrong, the blowing up of innocent people is a terrible business and has no justification in any form but the shooting of the scumbags before they do it would be celebrated wildly. The shame is, in any terrorist attack, victims will include people who defended the bombers "rights" etc etc....too late for them though. So you prefer shooting innocent people...like Menezes...to bombing them...like hundreds of thousands in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. Why do you see shooting innocent people with bullets as something to celebrate any more than bombing them? Do you gladly accept that you could be shot dead on the metro like Menezes was, because your 'rights' are less important than restricting the rights of criminals? Gross exageration in my humblest. The "west" will have killed a hell of a lot less innocents than their own folk have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. well, I'm not bothered like....... in fact, you are totally wrong, the blowing up of innocent people is a terrible business and has no justification in any form but the shooting of the scumbags before they do it would be celebrated wildly. The shame is, in any terrorist attack, victims will include people who defended the bombers "rights" etc etc....too late for them though. So you prefer shooting innocent people...like Menezes...to bombing them...like hundreds of thousands in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. Why do you see shooting innocent people with bullets as something to celebrate any more than bombing them? Do you gladly accept that you could be shot dead on the metro like Menezes was, because your 'rights' are less important than restricting the rights of criminals? Gross exageration in my humblest. The "west" will have killed a hell of a lot less innocents than their own folk have. That would be to ignore the fact that the west are responsible for the insurgent violence going through the roof following the invasions. I couldn't hazard a guess as to exactly what proportion of deaths result from direct hits from our bombs and bullets compared with theirs, but considering that reports of the death toll now exceed a million I think hundreds of thousands is anything but a gross exaggeration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 (edited) Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. well, I'm not bothered like....... in fact, you are totally wrong, the blowing up of innocent people is a terrible business and has no justification in any form but the shooting of the scumbags before they do it would be celebrated wildly. The shame is, in any terrorist attack, victims will include people who defended the bombers "rights" etc etc....too late for them though. So you prefer shooting innocent people...like Menezes...to bombing them...like hundreds of thousands in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. Why do you see shooting innocent people with bullets as something to celebrate any more than bombing them? Do you gladly accept that you could be shot dead on the metro like Menezes was, because your 'rights' are less important than restricting the rights of criminals? Gross exageration in my humblest. The "west" will have killed a hell of a lot less innocents than their own folk have. That would be to ignore the fact that the west are responsible for the insurgent violence going through the roof following the invasions. I couldn't hazard a guess as to exactly what proportion of deaths result from direct hits from our bombs and bullets compared with theirs, but considering that reports of the death toll now exceed a million I think hundreds of thousands is anything but a gross exaggeration. Bearing in mind nobody was allowed to leave Fallujah before the massive airstrikes. Also bear in mind what happens to our brothers is also a warning to us. Edited February 9, 2010 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Leazes MagHe's like my dad A racist lad Loves the flag He gets quite mad It's rather sad he makes me gag What a scumbag bit strong that, calling me a scumbag. It isn't as if I go blowing up innocent civilians ......... Well I was joking, but I'm sure you've celebrated innocent civilians being blown up on this board as well as suggesting that more bombing should be done. well, I'm not bothered like....... in fact, you are totally wrong, the blowing up of innocent people is a terrible business and has no justification in any form but the shooting of the scumbags before they do it would be celebrated wildly. The shame is, in any terrorist attack, victims will include people who defended the bombers "rights" etc etc....too late for them though. So you prefer shooting innocent people...like Menezes...to bombing them...like hundreds of thousands in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc. Why do you see shooting innocent people with bullets as something to celebrate any more than bombing them? Do you gladly accept that you could be shot dead on the metro like Menezes was, because your 'rights' are less important than restricting the rights of criminals? Mistakes are made, compounded by his refusal to stop. Get real. Understand these things are based on life and death decisions and are instant. Only a complete idiot would suggest that a member of the security services make 100% sure someone is armed before shooting first. Do that and it is you who dies. Deny that you understand this and you really are a woolly headed imbecile, but it isn't you in the firing line is it. I don't recall ever saying I'm advocating shooting innocent people with bullets, so get your facts right. Iraq, Afghanistan especially are totally different - these are political decisions, right or wrong, and in such "war" situations it is impossible to avoid civilian casualties. The alternative is to pull out and leave them to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4375 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Mistakes are made, compounded by his refusal to stop No he didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooner 243 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 well, you commented on others "education".......and mine is none of yours, but I'm not impressed with your spelling.......nor your absurd brainwashed views Cheers Enoch, but I'm sure I'll cope ok Patel Does your xenophobia stretch to Hinduism now? The use of the name Patel has been discussed. You really are totally brainwashed, xenophobia !! Typical hand wringer no nowt. Know nowt, Shirley ok mohammed. What are you studying at school tomorrow English- you should try it sometime. Expand your life experience. oh, I went to school when exams were actually difficult and they didn't just give certificates away for free. ....walked to school through three feet of snow, uphill both ways.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 well, you commented on others "education".......and mine is none of yours, but I'm not impressed with your spelling.......nor your absurd brainwashed views Cheers Enoch, but I'm sure I'll cope ok Patel Does your xenophobia stretch to Hinduism now? The use of the name Patel has been discussed. You really are totally brainwashed, xenophobia !! Typical hand wringer no nowt. Know nowt, Shirley ok mohammed. What are you studying at school tomorrow English- you should try it sometime. Expand your life experience. oh, I went to school when exams were actually difficult and they didn't just give certificates away for free. ....walked to school through three feet of snow, uphill both ways.......... omg. Junior resorts to insults and smillies. Whats the matter lad, can't you let him answer for himself. What I say is true by the way. These GCSE's these days are piss easy and there are no "failures", exams made easy. Of course, you as a yank, know better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Mistakes are made, compounded by his refusal to stop No he didn't. you can answer the rest of the post in your own time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooner 243 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 well, you commented on others "education".......and mine is none of yours, but I'm not impressed with your spelling.......nor your absurd brainwashed views Cheers Enoch, but I'm sure I'll cope ok Patel Does your xenophobia stretch to Hinduism now? The use of the name Patel has been discussed. You really are totally brainwashed, xenophobia !! Typical hand wringer no nowt. Know nowt, Shirley ok mohammed. What are you studying at school tomorrow English- you should try it sometime. Expand your life experience. oh, I went to school when exams were actually difficult and they didn't just give certificates away for free. ....walked to school through three feet of snow, uphill both ways.......... omg. Junior resorts to insults and smillies. Whats the matter lad, can't you let him answer for himself. What I say is true by the way. These GCSE's these days are piss easy and there are no "failures", exams made easy. Of course, you as a yank, know better. no insults just laughing at your stereotypical assertion that everything was better and harder when you were young...guess manc-mag is right eh ........soft-cock.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 well, you commented on others "education".......and mine is none of yours, but I'm not impressed with your spelling.......nor your absurd brainwashed views Cheers Enoch, but I'm sure I'll cope ok Patel Does your xenophobia stretch to Hinduism now? The use of the name Patel has been discussed. You really are totally brainwashed, xenophobia !! Typical hand wringer no nowt. Know nowt, Shirley ok mohammed. What are you studying at school tomorrow English- you should try it sometime. Expand your life experience. oh, I went to school when exams were actually difficult and they didn't just give certificates away for free. ....walked to school through three feet of snow, uphill both ways.......... omg. Junior resorts to insults and smillies. Whats the matter lad, can't you let him answer for himself. What I say is true by the way. These GCSE's these days are piss easy and there are no "failures", exams made easy. Of course, you as a yank, know better. no insults just laughing at your stereotypical assertion that everything was better and harder when you were young...guess manc-mag is right eh ........soft-cock.... oh dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Mistakes are made, compounded by his refusal to stop. Get real. Understand these things are based on life and death decisions and are instant. Only a complete idiot would suggest that a member of the security services make 100% sure someone is armed before shooting first. Do that and it is you who dies. Deny that you understand this and you really are a woolly headed imbecile, but it isn't you in the firing line is it. As NSJ said, he never refused to stop, leaped a barrier or any of the other stuff the police anonomously leaked to the press. I don't recall ever saying I'm advocating shooting innocent people with bullets, so get your facts right. I don't think anyone has ever advocated rights for terrorists or bombers either, yet you keep insisting we have. So we're agreed inncoent people of any race should be able to protest and adhere to the law without fear of being shot, bombed, imprisoned, deported or abused. Iraq, Afghanistan especially are totally different - these are political decisions, right or wrong, and in such "war" situations it is impossible to avoid civilian casualties. The alternative is to pull out and leave them to it. In this "war" our side can bomb middle eastern countries and kill on a scale thousands of times greater than 'the enemy' have here. Why are the civiilian casualties we cause, on that far greater magnitude, unavoidable realities which you can excuse? What other tactics are left to the "enemy" in the face of the greatest military might on the planet invading and occupying their country? The alternative is to submit to western rule and the theft of their resources. I find it ironic your unwillingness to accept peaceful protest of immigrants here while insisting other countries should accept passively an invading army enforcing a new way of life on entire nations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Mistakes are made, compounded by his refusal to stop. Get real. Understand these things are based on life and death decisions and are instant. Only a complete idiot would suggest that a member of the security services make 100% sure someone is armed before shooting first. Do that and it is you who dies. Deny that you understand this and you really are a woolly headed imbecile, but it isn't you in the firing line is it. As NSJ said, he never refused to stop, leaped a barrier or any of the other stuff the police anonomously leaked to the press. I don't recall ever saying I'm advocating shooting innocent people with bullets, so get your facts right. I don't think anyone has ever advocated rights for terrorists or bombers either, yet you keep insisting we have. So we're agreed inncoent people of any race should be able to protest and adhere to the law without fear of being shot, bombed, imprisoned, deported or abused. Iraq, Afghanistan especially are totally different - these are political decisions, right or wrong, and in such "war" situations it is impossible to avoid civilian casualties. The alternative is to pull out and leave them to it. In this "war" our side can bomb middle eastern countries and kill on a scale thousands of times greater than 'the enemy' have here. Why are the civiilian casualties we cause, on that far greater magnitude, unavoidable realities which you can excuse? What other tactics are left to the "enemy" in the face of the greatest military might on the planet invading and occupying their country? The alternative is to submit to western rule and the theft of their resources. I find it ironic your unwillingness to accept peaceful protest of immigrants here while insisting other countries should accept passively an invading army enforcing a new way of life on entire nations. At the end of the day, your anti-west views and hand wringing only help the terrorists to hide and remain free. You have no understanding of security. We do not go into other countries to deliberately bomb civilians going about their daily routines. The bit in bold is laughable, do you seriously think we should submit to them ? Actually, I think that you probably do ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Do you think they should submit to us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Do you think they should submit to us? omg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15448 Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Do you think they should submit to us? omg. Yes then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4375 Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 We do not go into other countries to deliberately bomb civilians going about their daily routines. Yes we fucking do - how fucking stupid are you? Look up "shock and awe" - the deliberate bombing of Baghdad and other cities whith the only purpose of killing civilians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 We do not go into other countries to deliberately bomb civilians going about their daily routines. Yes we fucking do - how fucking stupid are you? Look up "shock and awe" - the deliberate bombing of Baghdad and other cities whith the only purpose of killing civilians. You missed off the ironicalicious sentence before that quote..."You have no understanding of security" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9303 Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 We do not go into other countries to deliberately bomb civilians going about their daily routines. Yes we fucking do - how fucking stupid are you? Look up "shock and awe" - the deliberate bombing of Baghdad and other cities whith the only purpose of killing civilians. Utter rubbish The purpose was to remove government, infrastructure and military targets, now undoubtedly civilians died, but to say the purpose was to solely target civilians is garbage. If they'd carpet bombed as per WW2 you may have had a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 We do not go into other countries to deliberately bomb civilians going about their daily routines. Yes we fucking do - how fucking stupid are you? Look up "shock and awe" - the deliberate bombing of Baghdad and other cities whith the only purpose of killing civilians. Utter rubbish The purpose was to remove government, infrastructure and military targets, now undoubtedly civilians died, but to say the purpose was to solely target civilians is garbage. If they'd carpet bombed as per WW2 you may have had a point. That said, weren't you an advocate of turning the whole place into a glass car park because some yanks on a messageboard thought it was a good idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 We do not go into other countries to deliberately bomb civilians going about their daily routines. Yes we fucking do - how fucking stupid are you? Look up "shock and awe" - the deliberate bombing of Baghdad and other cities whith the only purpose of killing civilians. Utter rubbish The purpose was to remove government, infrastructure and military targets, now undoubtedly civilians died, but to say the purpose was to solely target civilians is garbage. If they'd carpet bombed as per WW2 you may have had a point. Toonpack you used to have the best avatar on toontastic where's it gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now