Tom 14021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I know you dont like Leeds Stevie but they got 38k a couple of weeks ago, not bad for a League One game? I understand what youre saying though with the shite we have had to go through from out board, yet were still there! I have to say that Sheff Weds fans have had similar to us and they get on average 20k. How many of them were Huddersfield fans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donaldstott 0 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I know you dont like Leeds Stevie but they got 38k a couple of weeks ago, not bad for a League One game? I understand what youre saying though with the shite we have had to go through from out board, yet were still there! Leeds got 38k versus Liverpool, 36k against Huddersfield and 31k against Charlton. They clearly come out for the big games. The rest of the games they average about 22k (which is still pretty impressive, given the trauma they've gone through). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21364 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I know you dont like Leeds Stevie but they got 38k a couple of weeks ago, not bad for a League One game? I understand what youre saying though with the shite we have had to go through from out board, yet were still there! I have to say that Sheff Weds fans have had similar to us and they get on average 20k. How many of them were Huddersfield fans? Leeds only allocated them 2k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I doubt they stuck to that allocation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 43510 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 (edited) Having read the mackem board's post(24 pages- and they aren't obsessed? ), one thing kept jarring in my mind. They repeatedly put our superior support down to " obvious geographical advantages"..... ... try as I might I can't think what they are? 10 miles separates us, surely any 'geographical' factors which apply to us, also apply to them? Hmmm, not bitter then Edited December 22, 2009 by Monkeys Fist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I know you dont like Leeds Stevie but they got 38k a couple of weeks ago, not bad for a League One game? I understand what youre saying though with the shite we have had to go through from out board, yet were still there! I have to say that Sheff Weds fans have had similar to us and they get on average 20k. Leeds support is abysmal, it always has been, they couldn't even regularly fill the ground when they won the league in 1992. What made you think they had 38,000 in against Huddersfield? The crowd was 36,000 and 4,000 of those were from Huddersfield. So over 4,000 below capacity against a team 14 miles away who scored more goals in that league than anyone else, and could give them a really difficult test, a game like I say against a club 14 miles away, a proper derby game, nothing like Toon v Boro. These Leeds and Huddersfield supporters live on each others toes in the context of League One its a grudge game, especially as Huddersfield are a more historical club than Leeds, Leeds are utterly dominating League One and they're playing one of the best sides in the division who are their proper derby rivals, and only 32000 Leeds can be arsed to go with the game not televised. Their next game no doubt will be watched by the typical 17-22000 they always get, and this from a club with 2.5m people within 15 miles of the ground. Shit fans, shit club, always will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I know you dont like Leeds Stevie but they got 38k a couple of weeks ago, not bad for a League One game? I understand what youre saying though with the shite we have had to go through from out board, yet were still there! I have to say that Sheff Weds fans have had similar to us and they get on average 20k. How many of them were Huddersfield fans? Leeds only allocated them 2k. The corner bit is 2,300 alone, and they had half way along behind the goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Leeds ''catchment area'' is basically Yorkshire other than Sheffield. People from Huddersfield and Halifax, all around support(ed) Leeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21364 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I know you dont like Leeds Stevie but they got 38k a couple of weeks ago, not bad for a League One game? I understand what youre saying though with the shite we have had to go through from out board, yet were still there! I have to say that Sheff Weds fans have had similar to us and they get on average 20k. How many of them were Huddersfield fans? Leeds only allocated them 2k. The corner bit is 2,300 alone, and they had half way along behind the goal. Im only going on reports and one of the lads here who is a Huddersfield fan who went to the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21364 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Leeds ''catchment area'' is basically Yorkshire other than Sheffield. People from Huddersfield and Halifax, all around support(ed) Leeds. Not really Youre right with the (re) bit. They used to have a large catchment area but now they are more localised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Even Leeds itself, just Leeds has a population of 771,000, that's just Leeds. Newcastle has a population of 259,000. Now I accept that's misleading cos you could easily class North Tyneside as Newcastle but even then that only gives us a direct catchment area of 500,000, and don't forget our neighbours, who we compete with for support are by far a bigger and more passionately supported club than any side in Yorkshire including Leeds. Leeds should be getting 70,000 every week regardless what division they're in, but they're a mickey mouse club, always will be, Leeds has NEVER been a footballing city and never will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21364 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Even Leeds itself, just Leeds has a population of 771,000, that's just Leeds. Newcastle has a population of 259,000. Now I accept that's misleading cos you could easily class North Tyneside as Newcastle but even then that only gives us a direct catchment area of 500,000, and don't forget our neighbours, who we compete with for support are by far a bigger and more passionately supported club than any side in Yorkshire including Leeds. Leeds should be getting 70,000 every week regardless what division they're in, but they're a mickey mouse club, always will be, Leeds has NEVER been a footballing city and never will be. Putting it in numbers of population aye. isnt the Metropolitan area 800k? For Tyneside that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Even Leeds itself, just Leeds has a population of 771,000, that's just Leeds. Newcastle has a population of 259,000. Now I accept that's misleading cos you could easily class North Tyneside as Newcastle but even then that only gives us a direct catchment area of 500,000, and don't forget our neighbours, who we compete with for support are by far a bigger and more passionately supported club than any side in Yorkshire including Leeds. Leeds should be getting 70,000 every week regardless what division they're in, but they're a mickey mouse club, always will be, Leeds has NEVER been a footballing city and never will be. Putting it in numbers of population aye. isnt the Metropolitan area 800k? For Tyneside that is. Merseyside 1.4m, just over 1m for Tyne and Wear. We generally get bigger gates than Liverpool (without the amounts of OOT's they get), and Sunderland almost always get more than Everton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4446 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Being honest you have to take some cultural differences into account - I think in Yorkshire and Lancashire there are a lot of people who could be football fans who watch Rugby League instead - Bradford for example is a city which is almost as big as Leeds and bigger than Newcastle but has never really had a football fan base. People do use the "one club city" to try and excuse our crowds to an extend so in the interests of fairness but not reality you could count Tyne & Wear as the "city" and say there are two clubs (bear with me for a minute Stevie) - this then gets over the way South Tyneside has fans of both and also the pockets of Mackems in in the Northumberland old mining towns. In that context I think it shows that both clubs piss all over the rest of the country even if that does include some praise for them lot. I still think within that context we're better fans than Mackems though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I hate the mackems who come out with this ''Geordies think football was invented in 1992'' rubbish. Obviously the Keegan effect had a strong influence on the crowd, especially after boycoutts but Sunderland's crowd doubled between 1997 and 1999. So when was their football invented? Why did they average 13k in '87 but 46k in '02? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4446 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I hate the mackems who come out with this ''Geordies think football was invented in 1992'' rubbish. Obviously the Keegan effect had a strong influence on the crowd, especially after boycoutts but Sunderland's crowd doubled between 1997 and 1999. So when was their football invented? Why did they average 13k in '87 but 46k in '02? I hate it when they whinge about people in South Durham supporting us calling them Keegan Mags or whatever - I started going by train everywhere in 1982 and there were always loads of lads from Darlo/Bishop Aukland etc who followed us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 My Family are all Durham and have supported Newcastle since the 40's - or probably earlier. That includes away games and the like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Don't get me wrong, I myself have criticised our support at times, in terms of quality rather than quantity but we're still better than anyone else. Any uber neo toon fan reading that who is cringing because it's cool to pull every aspect of the club to pieces read it again. WE'RE STILL BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE. I challenge someone to tell me a club on earth to go through what we've been through... * Sacking of a legend in favour of a universally hated figure * Absolute proof of scores of occasions we have been lied to * Promises not delivered * Four managers in one season * Club for sale, then not, then back up, then not * Laughed at by every football supporter in Britain for the circus that has went on over the last 3 or 4 years * An almost universally national celebration of our relegation * Players earning 100k a week who care less about the club than horses * No money to spend * No leadership at boardroom level * No apparent long term aims * Comparitively speaking reasonably expensive pricing systems which remain, which rake in far more money than at least half the Premiership * Joey Barton * Champions League to Championship in 5 years and 9 months ....someone tell me a club on earth who would be averaging 44,000, getting 50,000 at some games in the second tier of their football, with all of that to contend with. I'll guestimate now what clubs would get: Liverpool 20,000 absolute tops Celtic 15,000 tops it's happened before Arsenal 25,000 Everton 13,000 it used to happen in the top flight Villa 10,000 Leeds 18,000 it happened to them, they can't even be discussed in the same breath as us. Tottenham Who knows what we would get if we had another two years down here, my view is 35-40,000, we have proved without question, without pause and without doubt when we sing "we are the loyalest football supporters the world has ever had" that is exactly what we are, and people who mention catchment areas....fuck off, this isn't a big catchment area, we have to share 1m with Sunderland, all of the clubs like Aston Villa, Everton, yids, even Leeds have a bigger direct catchment area than us. We have the best support in football and it's exactly why so many people try to shoot us down in flames, envy, jealousy and insecurity. Absolutely cracking post Stevie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 They repeatedly put our superior support down to " obvious geographical advantages"........ try as I might I can't think what they are? The geographical advantage is that their town city is a shitehole and the toon isn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 43510 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 They repeatedly put our superior support down to " obvious geographical advantages"........ try as I might I can't think what they are? The geographical advantage is that their town city is a shitehole and the toon isn't It is a medieval midden of a town. But that's down to them being filthy beggars. Nowt to do with geography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 They repeatedly put our superior support down to " obvious geographical advantages"........ try as I might I can't think what they are? The geographical advantage is that their town city is a shitehole and the toon isn't It is a medieval midden of a town. But that's down to them being filthy beggars. Nowt to do with geography. ...in which case the geographical advantage is that the toon isn't in Sunderland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 43510 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 They repeatedly put our superior support down to " obvious geographical advantages"........ try as I might I can't think what they are? The geographical advantage is that their town city is a shitehole and the toon isn't It is a medieval midden of a town. But that's down to them being filthy beggars. Nowt to do with geography. ...in which case the geographical advantage is that the toon isn't in Sunderland The right answer ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22457 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 strange you don't see many mackems posting on here anymore. what happened to definitely maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 strange you don't see many mackems posting on here anymore. what happened to definitely maybe? Probably not as much fun when we're more downbeat than they are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21364 Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Being honest you have to take some cultural differences into account - I think in Yorkshire and Lancashire there are a lot of people who could be football fans who watch Rugby League instead - Bradford for example is a city which is almost as big as Leeds and bigger than Newcastle but has never really had a football fan base. People do use the "one club city" to try and excuse our crowds to an extend so in the interests of fairness but not reality you could count Tyne & Wear as the "city" and say there are two clubs (bear with me for a minute Stevie) - this then gets over the way South Tyneside has fans of both and also the pockets of Mackems in in the Northumberland old mining towns. In that context I think it shows that both clubs piss all over the rest of the country even if that does include some praise for them lot. I still think within that context we're better fans than Mackems though. The Bulls get shite crowds now though in they last few seasons. They only get big crowds when we go over. It was only in the eraly days of the SL era when Noble was coach and when BN were big when they got big crowds. Wigan get more gates at the football than the Rugby. Manchester United get bigger gates than Salford. The only big gates in SL are Leeds St Helens Hull FC Warrington Wakefield and I would guess thats the order they go in too. If Saints ploughed money into a decent stadia I would see that figure rise slightly, because their ground is a SHIT hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now