GLOBAL WARMING

[Park Life 71]

All the major planets are connected by a magnetic bridge, global warming is being caused by a disturbance firstly in our magnetic field and its relationship with the sun and also the suns relationships with the other major planets and their fields. Also we are nearing the galactic central plain and this is causeing fluctuations in both our field and also the radiation the sun is putting out along with chain reactions inc the other planets. The universe is magnetic. It's not about the SUN HEATING UP OR GETTING BIGGER it's about our magnetic relationship with it and our surrounding planets. Solar systems are like huge magnetic rubber bands pushing and pulling, the cores of planets heating up due to this and creating weaker and stronger magnetic fields as a result, for instace right now we are being hit with more exotic particles than ever before due to moving closer to the plain of the galactic center, scientists won't understand all this for anther decade or two.

Edited July 9, 2010 by Park Life

[Happy Face 29]

So, how much Red Matter will fix it?

Edited July 9, 2010 by Happy Face

[The Fish 10966]

All the major planets are connected by a magnetic bridge, global warming is being caused by a disturbance firstly in our magnetic field and its relationship with the sun and also the suns relationships with the other major planets and their fields. Also we are nearing the galactic center and this is causeing fluctuations in both our field and also the radiation the sun is putting out along with chain reactions inc the other planets. The universe is magnetic.

so all we have to do is magnetise a lot of metal in the opposite direction and we're sorted?

Sweet! I'll get rubbing straight away!

 

to be honest if we could rig up some magnetiser to Jimbo's arm I'm sure we could save the world before home time!

[Park Life 71]

So, how much Red Matter will fix it?

 

This process is necessary to develop our emotional state, we are emotionally still children on this planet. The new magnetic and planetry allignements are for us to develop our weakest facet. We are intellectually and physically at very high points of understanding, but emotionally dangerous. Take the ride. I am a healer the planet is safe.

[Park Life 71]

There are just so many ways the Universe is out to get us. Astronomers have already considered the threat from our Sun's orbit around the center of the Milky Way. When our Sun rises up out of flat plane of the Milky Way, it appears we might be less protected from intergalactic radiation and cosmic rays. Well, it looks like passing through the middle of the galactic plane might have its own share of risks: an increased number of comets might be hurled towards the Earth because of gravitational interaction with the densest parts of our galaxy.

 

Researchers at the Cardiff Centre of Astrobiology have built a computer model of the Solar System's journey around the Milky Way. Instead of making a perfectly flat orbit around the galaxy's centre, it actually bounces up and down. At times it can rise right up out of the galactic plane – getting 100 light years above – and then dip down below it. They calculated that we pass through the plane every 35 to 40 million years.

 

And this time period seems to match dangerous periods of impacts on Earth. According to the number and age of craters on Earth, we seem to suffer increased impacts every 36 million years. Uh oh, that's a match."

 

 

Fuck sake stop wasting my time on this. Global warming is not man made. Lock it.

 

 

 

 

http://www.jstor.org/pss/36981

 

 

http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/rus...lds_planets.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Much of the observed increase in global surface temperature over the past 150 years occurred prior to the 1940's and after the 1980's. The main agents which are invoked are solar variability, changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas content or sulfur, due to natural or anthropogenic action, or internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. Magnetism has seldom been invoked, and evidence for connections between climate and magnetic field variations have received little attention. We review evidence for such connections, starting with suggested correlations, on three time scales: recent secular variation (10-100 years), historical and archeomagnetic change (100-5000 years) and excursions and reversals (1000-1 million years). We attempt to suggest which mechanisms could account for observed correlations. Evidence for correlations in field intensity changes, excursions and reversals, which invoke Milankovic forcing in the core, either directly or through changes in ice distribution and moments of inertia of the Earth, is still tenuous. Correlation between decadal changes in amplitude of geomagnetic variations of external origin, solar irradiance and global temperature is stronger. The correlation applies until the 1980's, suggesting that solar irradiance is the prime forcing function of climate until then, when the correlation breaks and anomalous warming may emerge from the signal. Indeed, only solar flux of energy and particles can jointly explain parallel variations in temperature and external magnetic field. The most intriguing feature may be recently proposed archeomagnetic jerks (see abstract by Gallet et al). These seem to correlate with significant climatic events. A proposed mechanism involves tilt of the dipole to low latitudes, resulting in enhanced cosmic-ray induced nucleation of clouds. Intense data acquisition over a broad range of durations is required to further probe these indications that the Earth's and Sun's magnetic fields may have significant bearing on climate change at various time scales."

 

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AGUFMGP51B..02F

 

 

 

Earth is heating up lately, but so are Mars, Pluto and other worlds in our solar system, leading some scientists to speculate that a change in the sun’s activity is the common thread linking all these baking events.

 

Others argue that such claims are misleading and create the false impression that rapid global warming, as Earth is experiencing, is a natural phenomenon.

 

While evidence suggests fluctuations in solar activity can affect climate on Earth, and that it has done so in the past, the majority of climate scientists and astrophysicists agree that the sun is not to blame for the current and historically sudden uptick in global temperatures on Earth, which seems to be mostly a mess created by our own species.

 

Wobbly Mars

 

Habibullo Abdussamatov, the head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, recently linked the attenuation of ice caps on Mars to fluctuations in the sun's output. Abdussamatov also blamed solar fluctuations for Earth’s current global warming trend. His initial comments were published online by National Geographic News.

 

“Man-made greenhouse warming has [made a] small contribution [to] the warming on Earth in recent years, but [it] cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance,” Abdussamatov told LiveScience in an email interview last week. “The considerable heating and cooling on the Earth and on Mars always will be practically parallel."

 

But Abdussamatov’s critics say the Red Planet’s recent thawing is more likely due to natural variations in the planet’s orbit and tilt. On Earth, these wobbles, known as Milankovitch cycles, are thought to contribute to the onset and disappearance ice ages.

 

 

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says

Kate Ravilious

for National Geographic News

February 28, 2007

 

Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural—and not a human-induced—cause, according to one scientist's controversial theory.

 

Earth is currently experiencing rapid warming, which the vast majority of climate scientists says is due to humans pumping huge amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. (Get an overview: "Global Warming Fast Facts".)

 

Mars, too, appears to be enjoying more mild and balmy temperatures.

 

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.

 

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

 

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.

 

Solar Cycles

 

Abdussamatov believes that changes in the sun's heat output can account for almost all the climate changes we see on both planets.

Mars and Earth, for instance, have experienced periodic ice ages throughout their histories.

 

"Man-made greenhouse warming has made a small contribution to the warming seen on Earth in recent years, but it cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance," Abdussamatov said.

 

By studying fluctuations in the warmth of the sun, Abdussamatov believes he can see a pattern that fits with the ups and downs in climate we see on Earth and Mars.

 

Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists.

Edited July 9, 2010 by Park Life

[Park Life 71]

In January 2007, physicist Robert Erhlich, who has been modelling Sol's core based upon recent work on magnetic instabilities (Grandpierre and Ágoston, 2005), published calculations on how core magnetic fields may produce small instabilities in the Solar plasma that would induce localized oscillations in temperature. While many oscillations cancel each other out, some reinforce one another and become long-lived temperature variations that allow the Sun's core temperature to oscillate around its average temperature of 13.6 million degrees Kelvin in cycles lasting either 100,000 or 41,000 years. Moreover, random interactions within the sun's magnetic field can flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other, matching the paleo-temperature record for ice ages on Earth for over the past 5.3 million years, when ice ages occurred occurred roughly every 41,000 years until about a million years ago when they switched to a roughly 100,000-year cycle. Since subtle changes in Earth's orbit known as the Milankovitch cycles can not be used to explain the million-year-old switch in ice-age cycles, these hypothesized Solar temperature fluctuations may be an important part of the explanation (Robert Erhlich, 2007; and Stuart Clark, New Scientist, January 25, 2007).

Edited July 9, 2010 by Park Life

[Ayatollah Hermione 14053]

So, how much Red Matter will fix it?

 

This process is necessary to develop our emotional state, we are emotionally still children on this planet. The new magnetic and planetry allignements are for us to develop our weakest facet. We are intellectually and physically at very high points of understanding, but emotionally dangerous. Take the ride. I am a healer the planet is safe.

 

ahhh, so THAT's what it is.

[The Fish 10966]

Fuck sake stop wasting my time on this. Global warming is not man made. Lock it.

 

Is it reasonable to posit that, by decimating the oxygenating plantlife and exponentially increasing the emissions of toxins, we have altered the chemical balance of this planet in a way that has no precedence?

 

therefore, man has had an affect on the change in climate and it would serve our interests to temper the deforestation and reduce the ecological impact of our industries?

[Renton 22002]

All the major planets are connected by a magnetic bridge, global warming is being caused by a disturbance firstly in our magnetic field and its relationship with the sun and also the suns relationships with the other major planets and their fields. Also we are nearing the galactic central plain and this is causeing fluctuations in both our field and also the radiation the sun is putting out along with chain reactions inc the other planets. The universe is magnetic. It's not about the SUN HEATING UP OR GETTING BIGGER it's about our magnetic relationship with it and our surrounding planets. Solar systems are like huge magnetic rubber bands pushing and pulling, the cores of planets heating up due to this and creating weaker and stronger magnetic fields as a result, for instace right now we are being hit with more exotic particles than ever before due to moving closer to the plain of the galactic center, scientists won't understand all this for anther decade or two.

 

Electromagnetism plays no part in the relationship between the planets, aside from the energy produced by the sun (i.e. if the Sun increases it's elecromagnetic output, it will affect us, but this will also cause a measurable change in the temperature of the Sun). It is the fourth fundamental force - Gravity - that binds us over astronomical distances.

 

I never know how to take you Parky but you appear to be going through a rather bonkers stage, even by your standards.

[Renton 22002]

Fuck sake stop wasting my time on this. Global warming is not man made. Lock it.

 

Is it reasonable to posit that, by decimating the oxygenating plantlife and exponentially increasing the emissions of toxins, we have altered the chemical balance of this planet in a way that has no precedence?

 

therefore, man has had an affect on the change in climate and it would serve our interests to temper the deforestation and reduce the ecological impact of our industries?

 

No, it's all down to some random cut-and-paste gibberish from the internet apparently.

[Park Life 71]

I suggest the donkeys wade through the big post with an open mind before the usual media led knee jerk jello responses. I am a healer the planet is safe.

[Guest]

They can't tax us for variation in the Sun's heat output though so best just stick to the original plan.

[The Fish 10966]

I suggest the donkeys wade through the big post with an open mind before the usual media led knee jerk jello responses. I am a healer the planet is safe.

fancy answering my post there Parkster?

[Guest Gordon McKeag]

You's wont be saying it's a myth when Alston has donkey rides and a pier.

[Park Life 71]

Fuck sake stop wasting my time on this. Global warming is not man made. Lock it.

 

Is it reasonable to posit that, by decimating the oxygenating plantlife and exponentially increasing the emissions of toxins, we have altered the chemical balance of this planet in a way that has no precedence?

 

therefore, man has had an affect on the change in climate and it would serve our interests to temper the deforestation and reduce the ecological impact of our industries?

 

The planet likes us, is why we are here. We will correct all our mistakes in time, we are still young.

[Park Life 71]

All the major planets are connected by a magnetic bridge, global warming is being caused by a disturbance firstly in our magnetic field and its relationship with the sun and also the suns relationships with the other major planets and their fields. Also we are nearing the galactic central plain and this is causeing fluctuations in both our field and also the radiation the sun is putting out along with chain reactions inc the other planets. The universe is magnetic. It's not about the SUN HEATING UP OR GETTING BIGGER it's about our magnetic relationship with it and our surrounding planets. Solar systems are like huge magnetic rubber bands pushing and pulling, the cores of planets heating up due to this and creating weaker and stronger magnetic fields as a result, for instace right now we are being hit with more exotic particles than ever before due to moving closer to the plain of the galactic center, scientists won't understand all this for anther decade or two.

 

Electromagnetism plays no part in the relationship between the planets, aside from the energy produced by the sun (i.e. if the Sun increases it's elecromagnetic output, it will affect us, but this will also cause a measurable change in the temperature of the Sun). It is the fourth fundamental force - Gravity - that binds us over astronomical distances.

 

I never know how to take you Parky but you appear to be going through a rather bonkers stage, even by your standards.

 

 

Electromagnetism and gravity are indistinguishable as forces and their resplendant footprints. Gravity is actuall a wave and a cousin of electromagnetism. It's how UFO's work.

 

 

Here's an example of magnetism and its effect on heat...

 

 

Heat shields are an important part of any space vehicle that re-enters the Earth's atmosphere. The next generation of heat shields to protect astronauts and payloads on their re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere may use superconducting magnets to deflect the plasma that forms in front of spacecraft as they travel at high speeds in the air. The first test of such a heat shield could happen as early as ten years from now, and the basic technology is already in development.

Edited July 9, 2010 by Park Life

[The Fish 10966]

Fuck sake stop wasting my time on this. Global warming is not man made. Lock it.

 

Is it reasonable to posit that, by decimating the oxygenating plantlife and exponentially increasing the emissions of toxins, we have altered the chemical balance of this planet in a way that has no precedence?

 

therefore, man has had an affect on the change in climate and it would serve our interests to temper the deforestation and reduce the ecological impact of our industries?

 

The planet likes us, is why we are here. We will correct all our mistakes in time, we are still young.

 

So that's a no, you don't want to answer my post. You're fopping mate, and fopping badly.

[Park Life 71]

Fuck sake stop wasting my time on this. Global warming is not man made. Lock it.

 

Is it reasonable to posit that, by decimating the oxygenating plantlife and exponentially increasing the emissions of toxins, we have altered the chemical balance of this planet in a way that has no precedence?

 

therefore, man has had an affect on the change in climate and it would serve our interests to temper the deforestation and reduce the ecological impact of our industries?

 

The planet likes us, is why we are here. We will correct all our mistakes in time, we are still young.

 

So that's a no, you don't want to answer my post. You're fopping mate, and fopping badly.

 

You're too silly to understand the answer. Of course man has had an impact on the health of the planet, but that has nowt to do with global warming.

[Park Life 71]

New Theory: Universe Was Born in a Black Hole

By Robert Roy Britt

Senior Science Writer

posted: 09:45 am ET

17 September 2003

 

 

If black holes and the Big Bang befuddle you, try wrapping your brain around this one: The entire universe may have been created in an explosion inside a black hole.

 

"It's a mathematically plausible model which refines the standard model of the Big Bang," said Blake Temple, a mathematician at the University of California, Davis.

 

The standard model holds that the universe began about 13.7 billion years ago. The Big Bang is described not as an explosion so much as a rapid outflow of material from a point of nearly infinite density. It is a theory, one among several attempting to describe the observed expansion of the universe today. It has not been proved.

 

The Big Bang has been compared to black holes before, because the tremendous crush of matter that defines a black hole is much like the unfathomable density that preceded the Big Bang. Both phenomena are termed singularities.

 

In the proposed modification to the standard model, the Big Bang is an actual explosion, Temple explained today in a statement, and it occurs within a black hole in an existing space. The shock wave of the explosion is expanding into an infinite space.

 

Temple also describes the whole scenario as a white hole, the theoretical opposite of a black hole because it tosses matter outward instead of pulling it in.

 

White holes have been talked about before, mostly as mathematical curiosities. There is no evidence these "anti-black holes" exist, whereas scientists have solid evidence for the presence of black holes.

 

Eventually, Temple says, the universe will emerge from all this as something like an exploded star, called a supernova, but on an enormously large scale. He said the new theory satisfies Einstein's equations in the General Theory of Relativity, which gave rise to the Big Bang theory.

 

Temple can't say where the matter we see today originally came from. What existed before the Big Bang? This, in fact, is a thorn in the side of all cosmologists, and it may never be answered because we can't see time and space as it existed prior to time as we know it.

 

But Temple and colleague Joel Smoller, from the University of Michigan, wrote recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:

 

"It is natural to wonder if there is a connection between the mass that disappears into black hole singularities and the mass that emerges from white hole singularities."

 

And it remains to be seen, or more likely not, whether any of this is true.

[Park Life 71]

 

 

It's why they are spraying barium and alluminium from them planes.

Edited July 9, 2010 by Park Life

[Park Life 71]

 

 

10. The coinciding periods of correlation between the Earth’s global temperature and the strength of the Earth’s global magnetic field

 

It is obvious that the long term variation between the temperature and Earth’s MF is coincident. We have known this for a long time but haven’t been able to figure out what caused this correlation.

 

 

 

We have seen above how the intensity of the solar wind must be suspected for being the real magnetic "dynamo" of Earth’s MF.

 

 

 

However, we have not fully understood the coinciding periods of correlation between Earth’s global temperature and the strength of Earth’s global MF.

 

 

 

According to the Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark (Danish National Space Center) the variation of Earth's temperature is (in brief) caused by the intensity of the solar wind.

 

 

 

For the first time in history, we therefore have a serious common denominator that can explain both the variation of Earth’s temperature as well as the cause of the (real) dynamo of Earth’s MF.

[Park Life 71]

[Renton 22002]

All the major planets are connected by a magnetic bridge, global warming is being caused by a disturbance firstly in our magnetic field and its relationship with the sun and also the suns relationships with the other major planets and their fields. Also we are nearing the galactic central plain and this is causeing fluctuations in both our field and also the radiation the sun is putting out along with chain reactions inc the other planets. The universe is magnetic. It's not about the SUN HEATING UP OR GETTING BIGGER it's about our magnetic relationship with it and our surrounding planets. Solar systems are like huge magnetic rubber bands pushing and pulling, the cores of planets heating up due to this and creating weaker and stronger magnetic fields as a result, for instace right now we are being hit with more exotic particles than ever before due to moving closer to the plain of the galactic center, scientists won't understand all this for anther decade or two.

 

Electromagnetism plays no part in the relationship between the planets, aside from the energy produced by the sun (i.e. if the Sun increases it's elecromagnetic output, it will affect us, but this will also cause a measurable change in the temperature of the Sun). It is the fourth fundamental force - Gravity - that binds us over astronomical distances.

 

I never know how to take you Parky but you appear to be going through a rather bonkers stage, even by your standards.

 

 

Electromagnetism and gravity are indistinguishable as forces and their resplendant footprints. Gravity is actuall a wave and a cousin of electromagnetism. It's how UFO's work.

 

 

Here's an example of magnetism and its effect on heat...

 

 

Heat shields are an important part of any space vehicle that re-enters the Earth's atmosphere. The next generation of heat shields to protect astronauts and payloads on their re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere may use superconducting magnets to deflect the plasma that forms in front of spacecraft as they travel at high speeds in the air. The first test of such a heat shield could happen as early as ten years from now, and the basic technology is already in development.

 

The heat isn't caused by gravity, it's caused by friction with ionised particles (plasma). These magnets may be able to greatly reduce that, it sounds like promising technology, but it has NOWT to do with anything you have said.

 

Without Googling Parky, could you honestly even describe the four fundamental forces of physics?

[Park Life 71]

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/EarthMagneticField.htm

 

Earth, the giant magnet

 

Magnetic energy generated in the Earth's core results in a geomagnetic field. This phenomenon, which makes compass navigation possible, also deflects and absorbs harmful solar radiation.

 

Earth's solid inner core, mostly iron, is surrounded by a chiefly fluid outer core, consisting mostly of molten iron. The interaction of these two regions, in which material flows at different rates, creates what scientists call a "hydromagnetic dynamo," something like an electric motor that results in a magnetic field akin to a giant bar magnet.

 

Invisible geomagnetic lines stretch from one pole, curve far out into space, then back to the opposing pole. In a static environment, the curved lines might appear like a wire-frame model of some giant pumpkin, but the electrically charged solar wind blows the pumpkin into a teardrop shape.

 

As best as researchers can tell, this protective field has existed in various forms for at least 3 billion years, periodically growing stronger and weaker, shifting around and, on a few occasions, even flipping its polarity entirely. Scientists have examined old rocks for indications of previous reversals, which leave directional clues in solidified magnetic minerals.

 

At times, the field is thought to weaken to practically nothing, a state that would leave earthlings exposed to high doses of solar radiation.

Edited July 9, 2010 by Park Life

[Park Life 71]

All the major planets are connected by a magnetic bridge, global warming is being caused by a disturbance firstly in our magnetic field and its relationship with the sun and also the suns relationships with the other major planets and their fields. Also we are nearing the galactic central plain and this is causeing fluctuations in both our field and also the radiation the sun is putting out along with chain reactions inc the other planets. The universe is magnetic. It's not about the SUN HEATING UP OR GETTING BIGGER it's about our magnetic relationship with it and our surrounding planets. Solar systems are like huge magnetic rubber bands pushing and pulling, the cores of planets heating up due to this and creating weaker and stronger magnetic fields as a result, for instace right now we are being hit with more exotic particles than ever before due to moving closer to the plain of the galactic center, scientists won't understand all this for anther decade or two.

 

Electromagnetism plays no part in the relationship between the planets, aside from the energy produced by the sun (i.e. if the Sun increases it's elecromagnetic output, it will affect us, but this will also cause a measurable change in the temperature of the Sun). It is the fourth fundamental force - Gravity - that binds us over astronomical distances.

 

I never know how to take you Parky but you appear to be going through a rather bonkers stage, even by your standards.

 

 

Electromagnetism and gravity are indistinguishable as forces and their resplendant footprints. Gravity is actuall a wave and a cousin of electromagnetism. It's how UFO's work.

 

 

Here's an example of magnetism and its effect on heat...

 

 

Heat shields are an important part of any space vehicle that re-enters the Earth's atmosphere. The next generation of heat shields to protect astronauts and payloads on their re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere may use superconducting magnets to deflect the plasma that forms in front of spacecraft as they travel at high speeds in the air. The first test of such a heat shield could happen as early as ten years from now, and the basic technology is already in development.

 

The heat isn't caused by gravity, it's caused by friction with ionised particles (plasma). These magnets may be able to greatly reduce that, it sounds like promising technology, but it has NOWT to do with anything you have said.

 

Without Googling Parky, could you honestly even describe the four fundamental forces of physics?

 

 

Why didn't you say you wanted t discuss the gluon, photon, graviton etc....Personally I thought they were made up.