Renton 22448 Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Newcastle upon Tyne has been named as Britain's greenest city in a think tank's annual study. Forum for the Future looked at the sustainability of the 20 biggest cities, measuring factors such as air quality, wildlife and quality of life. Newcastle, which beat 2008 winner Bristol into second, performed well "on many measures of sustainability". Brighton and Hove came third, with Leicester fourth and London fifth. Edinburgh was seventh and Cardiff 10th. The study measured 13 indicators of environmental performance, quality of life and how well prepared the cities are for the future. 'Industrial heritage' This involved looking at issues such as action on climate change and the vibrancy of the local economy. BRITAIN'S GREENEST CITIES 1. Newcastle 2. Bristol 3. Brighton and Hove 4. Leicester 5. London 6. Leeds 7. Edinburgh 8. Nottingham 9. Sheffield 10. Cardiff Newcastle topped the environmental rankings, which included measures on air quality, wildlife and residents' "ecological footprint" - the amount of land it takes to provide them with food, transport, housing, goods and services. It also performed well in quality of life measures such as life expectancy and education, plus its planning for the future, to rise overall in the table from fourth last year and eighth place in 2007. Peter Madden, chief executive of Forum for the Future, said: "Cities with an industrial heritage face genuine challenges, but Newcastle's success shows that it is possible to overcome the legacy of the past and perform well on many measures of sustainability. "We hope it will inspire other cities to redouble their efforts." 'Ecological footprint target' Edinburgh slipped down one place in the rankings, compared with last year, to seventh overall. However, it came top in education, employment and air quality. Meanwhile, Cardiff fell from fifth to 10th in the league table and dropped from third to 18th on environmental performance. Plymouth fell from third to 12th overall. Hull came 20th, but Forum for the Future said that on the sustainability table its best results had been in the areas of planning for the future. It said this suggested improvements in other sectors could be close. The report warned that there was still a need for cities to reduce the average "ecological footprint" from its current level of five hectares per person to two hectares in order to prevent Britain's biggest cities using up more resources than the planet could sustain. From the Beeb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7318 Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 If Londons the 5th greenest the countrys fucked! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Where did Boro come? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Nowhere, it's not a city Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3640 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Where did Boro come? On it's daughter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15871 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Where did Boro come? On it's daughter! Touché. (In a naughty place.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now