AgentAxeman 199 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/1...eert-wilders-uk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 He doing Question Time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) OMFG My view is he should be allowed to come here because he's gained far more publicity with the attempts to stop him and that cleric Ken Livingstone was all over like a rash was allowed in the country, for example. I don't think the House of Lords should be the sort of place showing his (what I assume to be) propaganda however (I know it isn't on this occasion). Edited October 16, 2009 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 He gets more publicity due to the song and dance of his arrival than the validity of anything he has to say.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 OMFG My view is he should be allowed to come here because he's gained far more publicity with the attempts to stop him and that cleric Ken Livingstone was all over like a rash was allowed in the country, for example. I don't think the House of Lords should be the sort of place showing his (what I assume to be) propaganda however (I know it isn't on this occasion). I don't think he was getting a screening room indoors or owt. He was just gonna project it on a wall, or play it on his iphone. Surely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 OMFG My view is he should be allowed to come here because he's gained far more publicity with the attempts to stop him and that cleric Ken Livingstone was all over like a rash was allowed in the country, for example. I don't think the House of Lords should be the sort of place showing his (what I assume to be) propaganda however (I know it isn't on this occasion). I don't think he was getting a screening room indoors or owt. He was just gonna project it on a wall, or play it on his iphone. Surely I think he'd been invited to show it at a private screening in the Lords like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) OMFG My view is he should be allowed to come here because he's gained far more publicity with the attempts to stop him and that cleric Ken Livingstone was all over like a rash was allowed in the country, for example. I don't think the House of Lords should be the sort of place showing his (what I assume to be) propaganda however (I know it isn't on this occasion). I don't think he was getting a screening room indoors or owt. He was just gonna project it on a wall, or play it on his iphone. Surely I think he'd been invited to show it at a private screening in the Lords like. Seems so... Wilders is in the UK to thank his lawyers and to meet Lord Pearson, the Ukip member of the House of Lords who originally invited him to screen the 17-minute Fitna. If i was in the lords I'd put on a screening of Up in the room next door at the same time. Edited October 16, 2009 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 OMFG My view is he should be allowed to come here because he's gained far more publicity with the attempts to stop him and that cleric Ken Livingstone was all over like a rash was allowed in the country, for example. I don't think the House of Lords should be the sort of place showing his (what I assume to be) propaganda however (I know it isn't on this occasion). I don't think he was getting a screening room indoors or owt. He was just gonna project it on a wall, or play it on his iphone. Surely I think he'd been invited to show it at a private screening in the Lords like. Probably an appetiser fot the donkey porn to follow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 I bet it's shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15871 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 If i was in the lords I'd put on a screening of Up in the room next door at the same time. Class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soupdragon 0 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Many people see him as a comedy figure,a Dutch version of Boris Johnson,but if the polls are right he's going to be leader of the biggest party in parliament after the next elections.He can be very intelligent and persuasive but then comes out with loony policies such as a tax on headscarves.Don't give the guy the publicity and he'll fade away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 4089 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Many people see him as a comedy figure,a Dutch version of Boris Johnson,but if the polls are right he's going to be leader of the biggest party in parliament after the next elections.He can be very intelligent and persuasive but then comes out with loony policies such as a tax on headscarves.Don't give the guy the publicity and he'll fade away. Although not to be dismissed The Netherlands has such a convoluted multi party system of government he wont be able to pass anything mental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentAxeman 199 Posted October 18, 2009 Author Share Posted October 18, 2009 (edited) Many people see him as a comedy figure,a Dutch version of Boris Johnson,but if the polls are right he's going to be leader of the biggest party in parliament after the next elections.He can be very intelligent and persuasive but then comes out with loony policies such as a tax on headscarves.Don't give the guy the publicity and he'll fade away. :lol: what about bandanas??? Edited October 18, 2009 by AvatarAxeman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 TWO taxes on bandanas, or just one tax on wearing two bandanas?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Let the fucker in and then lock him up if he breaks any laws. Simple really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 901 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Fucking animal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt 0 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 The Govt was always going to struggle with Wilders- they are used to views against the impact of Islam eminating in the form of a rant from the Griffin's National Front in Suits. Let him speak then agree or disagree with him. One of the reasons our extreme political groups have gained such ground in recent years is that we are shit scared of having a calm and reasonable debate about what issues of race and religion mean for our society and how we can ensure that personal freedoms are maintained- including the right to a faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4446 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 They are letting the Pope in next year so I don't see the grounds for banning this bloke. I suppose they used the fear of violence to avoid free speech issues which they wouldn't have been able to use for the Pope but I find some of the views of both of them equally offensive - and would let them both in to encourage debate (minus the reverence to the latter). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentAxeman 199 Posted October 18, 2009 Author Share Posted October 18, 2009 TWO taxes on bandanas, or just one tax on wearing two bandanas?? Whoops!, dont know how that happened. Corrected now!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now