2nd most popular boys name in the UK

[trophyshy 7084]

Honky hissy-fit.

[Fop 1]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

 

 

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

 

Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end.

[Guest alex]

PBUHBTW

[Fop 1]

صلى الله عليه وسلم

[ewerk 31313]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

So Mohammad was the only foreign name given to UK kids?

[Renton 22158]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

So Mohammad was the only foreign name given to UK kids?

 

That's what I was thinking. Including girls.

[Happy Face 29]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

So Mohammad was the only foreign name given to UK kids?

 

Yes...in the top 100....because we aren't being over-run by a foreign influx.

[Happy Face 29]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

 

 

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

 

Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end.

 

Where does the 4% come from?

[Guest Stevie]

The word darkie on here is either acceptable or it isn't, which is it? What Renton is saying is people should have the carte blanche to use racist remarks as long as it's in appropriate context. That's just wrong.

 

Bollocks Stevie, you're not so daft as to believe that. You're just being ornery.

Meenzer was clearly using the terms ironically.

Yes, so what you're saying is it's completely acceptable to use the term ironically.

I take it by your booming silence that this forum is to assume racist language is definitely acceptable when used in ironic terms, just so we're clear about forum rules.

[Guest alex]

Almost feel sorry for sniffer when he attempts to post something incendiary btw.

[Fop 1]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

 

 

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

 

Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end.

 

Where does the 4% come from?

 

Latest estimates (neither that nor the 2001 census is likely to be massively accurate though).

 

Bill Gates may have come from several places.

[Happy Face 29]

Ridiculous thing to highlght. I can't find the raw data for 2009, but the 2008 data is here.

 

 

And it shows that 209,234 babies made up the top 100 names.

 

Of those, traditionally English (Western/White) names were given to 202,643 (96.85%)

 

The reamining 6591 (3.15%) got called Mohammad (or some variation).

 

If you click the link, you'll see they weren't reported as a combined figure that year. If they had been Mohammad would have come in third place.

 

1,591,000 Muslims recorded at the 2001 Census, forming 3% of the population. (source)

 

8 Years ago.

 

 

 

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

 

Interestingly Chris, did you see that Bill Gates now agree with Fop on population reduction? The all break in the end.

 

Where does the 4% come from?

 

Latest estimates (neither that nor the 2001 census is likely to be massively accurate though).

 

Bill Gates may have come from several places.

 

The latest estimates in your head?

[Fop 1]

Statistics also show that:

 

 

One immigrant arrives in the UK every minute.

 

There will be a 10m rise in the UK population in the next 20 years, 70% of which will be due to immigration.

 

 

 

 

 

And Bill Gates is suggesting only those that buy Windows7 should be allowed to breed.

[Fop 1]

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

[Happy Face 29]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

[Happy Face 29]

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

[Fop 1]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

[Happy Face 29]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

[Fop 1]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

 

Yes you can, you can do anything with statistics, it's all in how you present them (as you should well know).

[Happy Face 29]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

[Fop 1]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

[Happy Face 29]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

 

Yes you can, you can do anything with statistics, it's all in how you present them (as you should well know).

 

You can if you make them up as you go along...as you did just then.

[Happy Face 29]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

 

Do you know what a sample is?

[Fop 1]

Mind you that's a 1% growth to 4% in the last 8 years (est), or a whopping 25% increase in the total UK Muslim population in <8 years (and of course the total UK population has rise in that time by about 2 million).

 

 

Statistics are lying whores.

 

...and just to go back to this. You're the lying whore in this case.

 

You can't say based on what proprtion of the population was muslim 8 years ago, and what proportion is now. How much that population has increased. You can only say how much the proportion has increased.

 

So even if your 4% IS a reported best guess. In no way shape or form does that correlate with a 25% increase in muslim population.

 

If the entire UK population has grown by 0.5% and the Muslim population grew by (say) 1% in the same time it might have caused the jump from 3% to 4% as a proportion.

 

That assumes your 4% is a researched figure.

 

Yes you can, you can do anything with statistics, it's all in how you present them (as you should well know).

 

You can if you make them up as you go along...as you did just then.

 

Again only if Fop make up your figures too (you need to pay much more attention, Chris)

[Fop 1]

4% of the population only having 3.15% of the kids too. Their numbers must be dwindling based on that.

 

Muslims only have kids call Mohammed?

 

 

The latest estimates in your head?

Only if they figures you originally used, Chris, were only in Fops head too....... were they?

 

What do you mean? I've linked to the data i quoted.

 

You're yet to.

 

See what is there, not just what you want to see.

 

I already responded to the "all kids are called mohammed" question when it was asked earlier.

 

ALL non-muslim names aren't in the top 100. We're talking about a proportion of the figures available.

 

Then why quote the figure you did?

 

Do you know what a sample is?

 

Do you know why you quoted the figure you did?