Ayatollah Hermione 14094 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Do they post on any Newcastle-related message boards? While they've become a bit less important in the scheme of things with regards to ITK information and, even, match reports, I'm interested to know if they post on any boards. I know a lot of people don't agree with their standpoint on a lot of things and wonder if they ever have an open forum for people to discuss their opinions etc. Also, to my knowledge, they go to all the youth games too, don't they? It'd be interesting to see a studied opinion on the players coming through. I don't get on to N.O. so sorry if they're on there and it's common knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 They don't agree with message boards If I was to go by previous sound bites. Of course once they have secured the domain name their opinion is the be all and end all for Newcastle fans and anything message board peasants drill up is at best disagreeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 There are one or two posters who come out of the woodwork on NO when the .com thread gets bumped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 Dr Gloom shirley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4418 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 When Biffa introduced me to Niall I did tell him that I'd assumed he was an imaginary friend. I think their take is that message boards are not worth the hassle and they spend enough time just doing .com (I mean from a running one pov). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 14094 Posted July 30, 2009 Author Share Posted July 30, 2009 (edited) Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 When Biffa introduced me to Niall I did tell him that I'd assumed he was an imaginary friend. I think their take is that message boards are not worth the hassle and they spend enough time just doing .com (I mean from a running one pov). Oh, I understand why they wouldn't run one themselves with this and N.O. about but I just find it odd that they wouldn't have some kind of presence in the online community. Cheers for the replies. Edited July 30, 2009 by Stiva Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 Used to link to the old Toontastic before someone had the temerity to question their judgement so they took the huff iirc. I think they decided to 'go it alone' or 'stay independent' or something. Thought their recent piece on Xisco and Colocinni was tabloid journalism at its worst as well tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. I think we're allowed to debate stuff that's in the public domain like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. I think we're allowed to debate stuff that's in the public domain like. Of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. I think we're allowed to debate stuff that's in the public domain like. Of course So what's your point then? I don't see how it's any different to commenting on a newspaper story. I go on the site because it's about us and it's good for info. Their match reports are usually worth a read too. If I disagree with something they say, I'll say so. I don't actually know whether I agree with what they've written until I read it though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7084 Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 Their match reports are cracking tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. I think we're allowed to debate stuff that's in the public domain like. Of course So what's your point then? I don't see how it's any different to commenting on a newspaper story. I go on the site because it's about us and it's good for info. Their match reports are usually worth a read too. If I disagree with something they say, I'll say so. I don't actually know whether I agree with what they've written until I read it though tbh Alex my comment wasn't aimed at you or anyone on here in particular. nufc.com is a website run by a couple of opinionated fans who don't pretend to be impartial. Of course nobody's going to agree with some (or even much) of what they say. However I've read the views of some people on N-O who rant on and on about Niall and Biffa, and complain that they're not accountable etc. It's a self published website, they're fans not not journalists; if I found their views consistently objectionable I just wouldn't go on there anymore. That's all I meant. tbh I think they want to provoke debate, they just don't want to take part in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. I think we're allowed to debate stuff that's in the public domain like. Of course So what's your point then? I don't see how it's any different to commenting on a newspaper story. I go on the site because it's about us and it's good for info. Their match reports are usually worth a read too. If I disagree with something they say, I'll say so. I don't actually know whether I agree with what they've written until I read it though tbh Alex my comment wasn't aimed at you or anyone on here in particular. nufc.com is a website run by a couple of opinionated fans who don't pretend to be impartial. Of course nobody's going to agree with some (or even much) of what they say. However I've read the views of some people on N-O who rant on and on about Niall and Biffa, and complain that they're not accountable etc. It's a self published website, they're fans not not journalists; if I found their views consistently objectionable I just wouldn't go on there anymore. That's all I meant. tbh I think they want to provoke debate, they just don't want to take part in it. Fair enough but if you don't like N-O, don't go on there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 If you don't like their site, don't go on it. I think we're allowed to debate stuff that's in the public domain like. Of course So what's your point then? I don't see how it's any different to commenting on a newspaper story. I go on the site because it's about us and it's good for info. Their match reports are usually worth a read too. If I disagree with something they say, I'll say so. I don't actually know whether I agree with what they've written until I read it though tbh Alex my comment wasn't aimed at you or anyone on here in particular. nufc.com is a website run by a couple of opinionated fans who don't pretend to be impartial. Of course nobody's going to agree with some (or even much) of what they say. However I've read the views of some people on N-O who rant on and on about Niall and Biffa, and complain that they're not accountable etc. It's a self published website, they're fans not not journalists; if I found their views consistently objectionable I just wouldn't go on there anymore. That's all I meant. tbh I think they want to provoke debate, they just don't want to take part in it. Fair enough but if you don't like N-O, don't go on there. Generally I don't these days tbh. The pro-Ashley stance of some of the posters beggared belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted August 1, 2009 Share Posted August 1, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Biffa so awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandman02uk 0 Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. nice post Stevie, I think this is the first one where you've not listed attendance figures or called someone an odious cun......doh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. nice post Stevie, I think this is the first one where you've not listed attendance figures or called someone an odious cun......doh! Well done for winning the annual "Fop Most boring post of 2009 award". Yes it's been named after Fop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandman02uk 0 Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. nice post Stevie, I think this is the first one where you've not listed attendance figures or called someone an odious cun......doh! Well done for winning the annual "Fop Most boring post of 2009 award". Yes it's been named after Fop. I'm extremely pleased to have beaten off the 6976 posts from yourself that where serious contenders for this coveted award Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. nice post Stevie, I think this is the first one where you've not listed attendance figures or called someone an odious cun......doh! Well done for winning the annual "Fop Most boring post of 2009 award". Yes it's been named after Fop. I'm extremely pleased to have beaten off the 6976 posts from yourself that where serious contenders for this coveted award None of mine were nominated you non-entity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandman02uk 0 Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. nice post Stevie, I think this is the first one where you've not listed attendance figures or called someone an odious cun......doh! Well done for winning the annual "Fop Most boring post of 2009 award". Yes it's been named after Fop. I'm extremely pleased to have beaten off the 6976 posts from yourself that where serious contenders for this coveted award None of mine were nominated you non-entity Certainly there was 1 that was a good one, back in 2007 I think it was can you tell I'm in work and bored and can't be arsed to talk about how much of a cunt Ashely is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted August 3, 2009 Share Posted August 3, 2009 (edited) Biffa is Sima and the other one (who always strikes me as Andrew Ridgley of the partnership) is J69 That makes sense, I've always thought the two of them had similar arsehole tendencies now I know why. nice post Stevie, I think this is the first one where you've not listed attendance figures or called someone an odious cun......doh! Well done for winning the annual "Fop Most boring post of 2009 award". Yes it's been named after Fop. I'm extremely pleased to have beaten off the 6976 posts from yourself that where serious contenders for this coveted award None of mine were nominated you non-entity Certainly there was 1 that was a good one, back in 2007 I think it was can you tell I'm in work and bored and can't be arsed to talk about how much of a cunt Ashely is So I've made one more good post in your mind, than you have in mine. I can normally remember at least one post off regular posters off here, where I think aye the cunt made a good point there, or it was funny, whatever etc... but not you at this point. I'm not taking abuse off some jock who spells definitely with two f's and an a. Edited August 3, 2009 by Stevie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now