Sir Bob Almighty! 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 This is a message from a mate of mine, who knows someone in a particular department of the NUFC, those of you who have seen my posts over the last few months, know I'm not a twat who goes around talking bullshit and I'm just hoping this might not be bullshit aswell. Anyway heres the message: "new owners are from hong kong, vialli as director of football, shearer as manager, 30m for transfers. 85m for the club and then paying ashley back his 100m over a period of time. and a 40m overdraft to be paid back to barclays over 2 years. beckford is the first singing and apparently it's a done deal it just needs to be signed off after the takeover. offers received for oba, smith, colocini and jonas. and all of this is supposed to be announced tomorrow. providing noone backs out." What do you think about that then? Possible? or just someone having a laugh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Someone already posted the same rumour on here. Not saying that means it's bollocks but it's obviously doing the rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 That's almost word for word what was posted on Skunkers last week. It's just missing the white text saying it was a piss take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Bob Almighty! 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Author Share Posted July 8, 2009 See thats exactly why I didnt get too carried away, probably bullshit if it was doing the rounds last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 As has been said, it's confirmed boolsheet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7095 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Name change to Bassong Gobshitey please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 "new owners are from hong kong, vialli as director of football, shearer as manager, 30m for transfers. 85m for the club and then paying ashley back his 100m over a period of time. and a 40m overdraft to be paid back to barclays over 2 years. beckford is the first singing and apparently it's a done deal it just needs to be signed off after the takeover. offers received for oba, smith, colocini and jonas. and all of this is supposed to be announced tomorrow. providing noone backs out." Assley effectively getting £225m for the club after what he as done would be: and again anyone willing to pay £80m (all in) for NUFC at the moment is probably too daft to run it, never mind more. (it is probably just wild speculation though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bias 3 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 prob bs but we can hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Am not sure 80m is an over-valuation ferp. Parky has quoted me a few times (confusing me with his 'friend' who works for Coutts) on the VC rule of thumb for business evaluation, which is 3 times revenue. As revenue streams over the normal business planning period of 3-5 years need to be weighted by the probability of being in the prem / championship, the 80m figure isnt that bad a guess imo. Even if we consider that TV revenue is about a third of our income and adjusting for debt and reduced revenue from season tickets and merchandise etc, then i can see how this is considered a fair price. I'm also sure that these deals are governed by regulations regarding price abitration, ensuring that the seller receives a price that reflects the underlying value of the business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Am not sure 80m is an over-valuation ferp. Parky has quoted me a few times (confusing me with his 'friend' who works for Coutts) on the VC rule of thumb for business evaluation, which is 3 times revenue. As revenue streams over the normal business planning period of 3-5 years need to be weighted by the probability of being in the prem / championship, the 80m figure isnt that bad a guess imo. Even if we consider that TV revenue is about a third of our income and adjusting for debt and reduced revenue from season tickets and merchandise etc, then i can see how this is considered a fair price. I'm also sure that these deals are governed by regulations regarding price abitration, ensuring that the seller receives a price that reflects the underlying value of the business. £80m all in, maybe (possibly) just. But an effective £125m-£255m, . (although as mentioned in the other thread there may well be idiots prepared to pay that) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Am not sure 80m is an over-valuation ferp. Parky has quoted me a few times (confusing me with his 'friend' who works for Coutts) on the VC rule of thumb for business evaluation, which is 3 times revenue. As revenue streams over the normal business planning period of 3-5 years need to be weighted by the probability of being in the prem / championship, the 80m figure isnt that bad a guess imo. Even if we consider that TV revenue is about a third of our income and adjusting for debt and reduced revenue from season tickets and merchandise etc, then i can see how this is considered a fair price. I'm also sure that these deals are governed by regulations regarding price abitration, ensuring that the seller receives a price that reflects the underlying value of the business. Isn't the idea of VC that one day growing businesses will actually make money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Am not sure 80m is an over-valuation ferp. Parky has quoted me a few times (confusing me with his 'friend' who works for Coutts) on the VC rule of thumb for business evaluation, which is 3 times revenue. As revenue streams over the normal business planning period of 3-5 years need to be weighted by the probability of being in the prem / championship, the 80m figure isnt that bad a guess imo. Even if we consider that TV revenue is about a third of our income and adjusting for debt and reduced revenue from season tickets and merchandise etc, then i can see how this is considered a fair price. I'm also sure that these deals are governed by regulations regarding price abitration, ensuring that the seller receives a price that reflects the underlying value of the business. £80m all in, maybe (possibly) just. But an effective £125m-£255m, . (although as mentioned in the other thread there may well be idiots prepared to pay that) If the club does get promoted in one season, they will make a tidy profit the followig year, merchandise up, tv revenue up, season tickets up, foreign (far eastern) revenue streams up, cost base low. I know it may seem unfathomable why anyone would want to buy the shit-tip at this price but its not beyond the realms of possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Am not sure 80m is an over-valuation ferp. Parky has quoted me a few times (confusing me with his 'friend' who works for Coutts) on the VC rule of thumb for business evaluation, which is 3 times revenue. As revenue streams over the normal business planning period of 3-5 years need to be weighted by the probability of being in the prem / championship, the 80m figure isnt that bad a guess imo. Even if we consider that TV revenue is about a third of our income and adjusting for debt and reduced revenue from season tickets and merchandise etc, then i can see how this is considered a fair price. I'm also sure that these deals are governed by regulations regarding price abitration, ensuring that the seller receives a price that reflects the underlying value of the business. Isn't the idea of VC that one day growing businesses will actually make money? Or liquidising the assets, aye. Anyway yes, its a gamble on promotion and the long term success of english football, meaning the capital investment at least holds its value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21456 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Bullshit Shearer was one of the best Strikers in the world and he signs BECKFORD as his fistt signing? Fuck right off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Vialli? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Stopped reading it when I saw a 'director of football' mentioned. No way would Shearer accept that after the carry on with Dennis Cunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31582 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 those of you who have seen my posts over the last few months, know I'm not a twat Do we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Bassong! You're a twat now do one before you get hurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N17 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 This is a message from a mate of mine, who knows someone in a particular department of the NUFC, those of you who have seen my posts over the last few months, know I'm not a twat who goes around talking bullshit and I'm just hoping this might not be bullshit aswell. Anyway heres the message: "new owners are from hong kong, vialli as director of football, shearer as manager, 30m for transfers. 85m for the club and then paying ashley back his 100m over a period of time. and a 40m overdraft to be paid back to barclays over 2 years. beckford is the first singing and apparently it's a done deal it just needs to be signed off after the takeover. offers received for oba, smith, colocini and jonas. and all of this is supposed to be announced tomorrow. providing noone backs out." What do you think about that then? Possible? or just someone having a laugh? Despite your opening and closing get outs... you are still a bullshit peddler. Shit on a stick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Castell 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Whoever does take over, I hope for you guys they're better than everyone post-Sir John Hall. FFF was a tosser who laid the foundations, whilst Mike Ashley was the Wanky Shit Demon who had built the castle of turd upon them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Bob Almighty! 0 Posted July 8, 2009 Author Share Posted July 8, 2009 those of you who have seen my posts over the last few months, know I'm not a twat Do we? I never said i wasnt a twat, just not a bullshitting twat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Whoever does take over, I hope for you guys they're better than everyone post-Sir John Hall. FFF was a tosser who laid the foundations, whilst Mike Ashley was the Wanky Shit Demon who had built the castle of turd upon them. Johnny Hall doesnt get off scot free either, it was him that forced the sale to Ashley (and us who thought it was a good thing). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 43578 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 those of you who have seen my posts over the last few months, know I'm not a twat Do we? I never said i wasnt a twat, just not a bullshitting twat. You Twatted Sam Jacks window, did you not Sir? What happened with that anyway- remember you were fairly worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Am not sure 80m is an over-valuation ferp. Parky has quoted me a few times (confusing me with his 'friend' who works for Coutts) on the VC rule of thumb for business evaluation, which is 3 times revenue. As revenue streams over the normal business planning period of 3-5 years need to be weighted by the probability of being in the prem / championship, the 80m figure isnt that bad a guess imo. Even if we consider that TV revenue is about a third of our income and adjusting for debt and reduced revenue from season tickets and merchandise etc, then i can see how this is considered a fair price. I'm also sure that these deals are governed by regulations regarding price abitration, ensuring that the seller receives a price that reflects the underlying value of the business. £80m all in, maybe (possibly) just. But an effective £125m-£255m, . (although as mentioned in the other thread there may well be idiots prepared to pay that) If the club does get promoted in one season, they will make a tidy profit the followig year, merchandise up, tv revenue up, season tickets up, foreign (far eastern) revenue streams up, cost base low. I know it may seem unfathomable why anyone would want to buy the shit-tip at this price but its not beyond the realms of possibility. Aye, but that's assuming we do get promoted (and we get our wage bill down before that), and assuming we don't get hammered and sent straight back down if we did. There'll be someone that will buy us at quite a lot more than £80m (at least once credit opens up more), but whether it will be someone the fans should want is another matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 21456 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 According to the Beeb the Mirror have this A Far East consortium bidding to buy Newcastle plan to put Alan Shearer and Gianluca Vialli together as the managerial team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now