Jump to content

Take administration now.


Park Life
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Totally agree there'll be money owed in weird places and for surprising amounts.

 

But Leeds were in league two and faced bankruptcy before their creditors agreed to the CVA. Ashley is our main creditor, so I doubt there's a judge in the land (if there not already legislation in place) that would sanction it.

 

You mean they'll just say MA has to pay up?

 

It's not always so straight forward, again in the Darlington FC case the main creditor was the Chairman/Owner who still owned the land (and would have even if the club itself had been liquidated), in the end he bought it (the club) back but with some debts wiped off IFRC. :razz::scratchchin:

 

Which is what is worrying, it's not always a case of "forced" into administration, it can be a viable business strategy in certain circumstances. :razz:

 

Vis a vie Bates at Leeds and the tricks of Leicester City.

 

If you want 'tricks' you want Sheepshanks at Ipswich - wiped £20m off their debt via administration, bought the club back himself, then brought in the 10pts immediately after and were around the playoffs that season.

Leicester City were near bankrupt thanks to inept planning, rather than trying on 'tricks': After administration the club was bought by a consortium of Pukka Pies, Gary Lineker and Emile Heskey and couldn't even afford any transfer fees after going up - the only reason the club is still going is that Muzzy Izzet turned down a move to Boro, really - the £4m or whatever it was would have kept administration away for another couple of months, but without that promotion (by 12pts!) things wouldn't have looked good. The 10% to the taxman thing is simply because that was what anyone got back out of it, much the same as others. Wasn't a case of going into it intentionally to make things easier like Leeds and Ipswich but just a huge, huge cock up by all manner of idiots; and unfortunately when anyone can't repay debts someone is going to have to cut their losses, either by administration or a winding up - and the first made more money than the second would have, luckily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree there'll be money owed in weird places and for surprising amounts.

 

But Leeds were in league two and faced bankruptcy before their creditors agreed to the CVA. Ashley is our main creditor, so I doubt there's a judge in the land (if there not already legislation in place) that would sanction it.

 

You mean they'll just say MA has to pay up?

 

It's not always so straight forward, again in the Darlington FC case the main creditor was the Chairman/Owner who still owned the land (and would have even if the club itself had been liquidated), in the end he bought it (the club) back but with some debts wiped off IFRC. :no:scratchchin:

 

Which is what is worrying, it's not always a case of "forced" into administration, it can be a viable business strategy in certain circumstances. :razz:

 

Vis a vie Bates at Leeds and the tricks of Leicester City.

 

If you want 'tricks' you want Sheepshanks at Ipswich - wiped £20m off their debt via administration, bought the club back himself, then brought in the 10pts immediately after and were around the playoffs that season.

Leicester City were near bankrupt thanks to inept planning, rather than trying on 'tricks': After administration the club was bought by a consortium of Pukka Pies, Gary Lineker and Emile Heskey and couldn't even afford any transfer fees after going up - the only reason the club is still going is that Muzzy Izzet turned down a move to Boro, really - the £4m or whatever it was would have kept administration away for another couple of months, but without that promotion (by 12pts!) things wouldn't have looked good. The 10% to the taxman thing is simply because that was what anyone got back out of it, much the same as others. Wasn't a case of going into it intentionally to make things easier like Leeds and Ipswich but just a huge, huge cock up by all manner of idiots; and unfortunately when anyone can't repay debts someone is going to have to cut their losses, either by administration or a winding up - and the first made more money than the second would have, luckily.

 

Ha ha... :razz:

 

Leicester City commissioned a new stadium and then tried not to pay most of the money to the building firm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the stadium that was completed before the club was forced into administration by the courts as protection against a winding up order from Eric Hall (& Dennis Wise's ridiculous court case) then? Terrible contingency planning, yes, and the construction company lost some money on that (they got the 10% all regular creditors were offered), but the bank took over the ground and there was still £16m left to be repaid against that when Mandaric took over iirc (bearing in mind that's half of the money there), which is better than the likes of Ipswich who took on debt to buy players, went down, wiped out the debt but kept the same people in charge and just missed out on their promotion challenge, and then promptly organised the -10pts. If Saints go back up next season will you have the same reaction?

 

 

It basically boils down to coming under two categories - Cock up or scam, and Leicester goes in the former, rather than the latter with dodgy cunts like Ken Bates.

Edited by ImpossiblyDaft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree there'll be money owed in weird places and for surprising amounts.

 

But Leeds were in league two and faced bankruptcy before their creditors agreed to the CVA. Ashley is our main creditor, so I doubt there's a judge in the land (if there not already legislation in place) that would sanction it.

 

You mean they'll just say MA has to pay up?

 

It's not always so straight forward, again in the Darlington FC case the main creditor was the Chairman/Owner who still owned the land (and would have even if the club itself had been liquidated), in the end he bought it (the club) back but with some debts wiped off IFRC. :no:scratchchin:

 

Which is what is worrying, it's not always a case of "forced" into administration, it can be a viable business strategy in certain circumstances. :razz:

 

Vis a vie Bates at Leeds and the tricks of Leicester City.

 

If you want 'tricks' you want Sheepshanks at Ipswich - wiped £20m off their debt via administration, bought the club back himself, then brought in the 10pts immediately after and were around the playoffs that season.

Leicester City were near bankrupt thanks to inept planning, rather than trying on 'tricks': After administration the club was bought by a consortium of Pukka Pies, Gary Lineker and Emile Heskey and couldn't even afford any transfer fees after going up - the only reason the club is still going is that Muzzy Izzet turned down a move to Boro, really - the £4m or whatever it was would have kept administration away for another couple of months, but without that promotion (by 12pts!) things wouldn't have looked good. The 10% to the taxman thing is simply because that was what anyone got back out of it, much the same as others. Wasn't a case of going into it intentionally to make things easier like Leeds and Ipswich but just a huge, huge cock up by all manner of idiots; and unfortunately when anyone can't repay debts someone is going to have to cut their losses, either by administration or a winding up - and the first made more money than the second would have, luckily.

 

and to think that only a few years ago not qualifying for europe and being caught on video making comments about Micheal Owen was considered embarrassing........

 

Someone should cut and paste this to the dumb cunts like Dave [nufcforever] on Newcastle Online :razz:

 

Bet the tosspot, banning people like a tough buy behind his keyboard doesn't reply.........as usual

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree there'll be money owed in weird places and for surprising amounts.

 

But Leeds were in league two and faced bankruptcy before their creditors agreed to the CVA. Ashley is our main creditor, so I doubt there's a judge in the land (if there not already legislation in place) that would sanction it.

 

You mean they'll just say MA has to pay up?

 

It's not always so straight forward, again in the Darlington FC case the main creditor was the Chairman/Owner who still owned the land (and would have even if the club itself had been liquidated), in the end he bought it (the club) back but with some debts wiped off IFRC. :no:scratchchin:

 

Which is what is worrying, it's not always a case of "forced" into administration, it can be a viable business strategy in certain circumstances. :razz:

 

Vis a vie Bates at Leeds and the tricks of Leicester City.

 

If you want 'tricks' you want Sheepshanks at Ipswich - wiped £20m off their debt via administration, bought the club back himself, then brought in the 10pts immediately after and were around the playoffs that season.

Leicester City were near bankrupt thanks to inept planning, rather than trying on 'tricks': After administration the club was bought by a consortium of Pukka Pies, Gary Lineker and Emile Heskey and couldn't even afford any transfer fees after going up - the only reason the club is still going is that Muzzy Izzet turned down a move to Boro, really - the £4m or whatever it was would have kept administration away for another couple of months, but without that promotion (by 12pts!) things wouldn't have looked good. The 10% to the taxman thing is simply because that was what anyone got back out of it, much the same as others. Wasn't a case of going into it intentionally to make things easier like Leeds and Ipswich but just a huge, huge cock up by all manner of idiots; and unfortunately when anyone can't repay debts someone is going to have to cut their losses, either by administration or a winding up - and the first made more money than the second would have, luckily.

 

and to think that only a few years ago not qualifying for europe and being caught on video making comments about Micheal Owen was considered embarrassing........

 

Someone should cut and paste this to the dumb cunts like Dave [nufcforever] on Newcastle Online :razz:

 

Bet the tosspot, banning people like a tough buy behind his keyboard doesn't reply.........as usual

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.