The Fish 10793 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I love this fallacy that at the sight of any cock a gay man will be so overcome with lust he'll not be able to resist having a gobble. Also that the thought of Leazes' shrivelled flaccid member would do anything for anybody ever. fwiw, No, I don't think those in the armed forces are keen on gays in their ranks, but I don't think that means they should be banned from it. If a man (or woman) feels an urge to protect his/her country I don't think something as irrelevant as sexual preference should get in the way. They also didn't want blacks to serve alongside whites... they seemed to have gotten over that bigotry oh noes, logic. faint.gif by the way Leazes? why are you allowed to generalise about Muslims, but any generalised left wing retort is to be ignored? tis you to a tee you're clueless like, but OK I suppose ... so you're not going to answer the question then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 30, 2010 Author Share Posted January 30, 2010 I love this fallacy that at the sight of any cock a gay man will be so overcome with lust he'll not be able to resist having a gobble. Also that the thought of Leazes' shrivelled flaccid member would do anything for anybody ever. fwiw, No, I don't think those in the armed forces are keen on gays in their ranks, but I don't think that means they should be banned from it. If a man (or woman) feels an urge to protect his/her country I don't think something as irrelevant as sexual preference should get in the way. They also didn't want blacks to serve alongside whites... they seemed to have gotten over that bigotry oh noes, logic. faint.gif by the way Leazes? why are you allowed to generalise about Muslims, but any generalised left wing retort is to be ignored? tis you to a tee you're clueless like, but OK I suppose ... so you're not going to answer the question then? not ignored if it makes sense and not defending them do gooder style Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10793 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I love this fallacy that at the sight of any cock a gay man will be so overcome with lust he'll not be able to resist having a gobble. Also that the thought of Leazes' shrivelled flaccid member would do anything for anybody ever. fwiw, No, I don't think those in the armed forces are keen on gays in their ranks, but I don't think that means they should be banned from it. If a man (or woman) feels an urge to protect his/her country I don't think something as irrelevant as sexual preference should get in the way. They also didn't want blacks to serve alongside whites... they seemed to have gotten over that bigotry oh noes, logic. faint.gif by the way Leazes? why are you allowed to generalise about Muslims, but any generalised left wing retort is to be ignored? tis you to a tee you're clueless like, but OK I suppose ... so you're not going to answer the question then? not ignored if it makes sense and not defending them do gooder style it's pretty straight forward old man, Why are your generalisations permissible and others' are not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Leazes is taking a pasting here tbh At least fop was inventive at dodging questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Chez I don't know what the best country to live in in the world is, as I've only ever lived in one country and clearly can't give an unbiased response. I don't understand why you asked the question. England is a great country, I love our way of life, the constraints imposed on us and an accumulation of political correctness, shocking immigration policies and as LM puts general apologists make this country a worse place than it was. You know when we played Germany in Euro96, The Mirror posted a picture of a kraut with the title ACHTUNG FRITZ or something like that, there was an outcry by idiots everywhere demonising a bit of light hearted fun. In the 80's this type of thing wouldn't have raised an eyebrow, today.....oh dear. Aye but thats the impact of political correctness, which is lamentable for many reasons. The point of the question is that British people have a very decent (if unequal) life and i dont see this issue as a major one for people's wellbeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15449 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Did anyone see the advert tonight for the free CD of soldiers singing sloppy love songs in tomorrow's Mail? Suddenly I'm thinking a trench war of attrition that decimates the ranks of our brave boys, girls and gays might be entirely justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4375 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 LM - One minute you're proud of the fact that the armed forces "don't like gays" and then the next you use the Muslim attitude to try and scare Meenzer - as I've said before it's actually funny how Muslim a lot of your attitudes are. At least you try and debate things without resorting to childish comments like manc mag so I'll respond in a similar adult fashion to you. I don't know what you mean by "muslim" views. There is always going to be "some" areas where someone has views with elements that co-incide with almost anything you care to name. I would say that I would agree that putting people in the slammer and imposing punishment where appropriate is right but that doesn't make someone a "muslim" because a muslim has that view, I think it is just imposing a rule of law that is right and correct. I believe in the taxpayer paying for elements of the welfare state ie education, Health Service, Transport etc but that doesn't make me a raving mad socialist either. I believe we should look after the less fortunate in society but at the same time impose a limit on benefits especially on those who show no inclination to work but that doesn't make me an evil Tory bastard. These are just views. I said to manc mag that the Armed Forces didn't really want gays in it but it has been forced on them [by do gooders and pc correct imbeciles ?] who they interfere in things that really don't concern them and they don't understand, and he is trying to tell me something completely different, or whatever he is trying to say I'm not bothered about. Gays used to be banned from the Forces, there was a reason for that. I'm also just making a point to meenzer by the way I'm sure he's a decent bloke and I've nowt against him. The thing is your main objection to Muslims seems to be that they don't integrate (which in some places is a fair point but not universal) and their values and culture are different to yours - all I'm saying is that your views on a few things seem pretty much in line with a lot of Muslim ones which are typically quite "conservative" - I don't mean that in the party sense but in terms of respect for the law and justice system and what are normally called family values. Whereas you think free speech should be limited by anti-british limits, most Muslims think free speech should be limited on religion - two different subjects but the principle of limiting free speech on something you don't like spoken against is the same. This leads me to ask what is so alien about their culture and values that you don't like if it can be demonstrated they align at several points? Of course I'm not talking about the "militant" ones who want to abuse troops etc - just the vast majority who just get on with their lives and as I said polls show have a lot more respect for what you call British values than someone like me has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentAxeman 174 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Did anyone see the advert tonight for the free CD of soldiers singing sloppy love songs in tomorrow's Mail? Suddenly I'm thinking a trench war of attrition that decimates the ranks of our brave boys, girls and gays might be entirely justified. Meenz, you are a BAD man!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Share Posted January 31, 2010 Did anyone see the advert tonight for the free CD of soldiers singing sloppy love songs in tomorrow's Mail? Suddenly I'm thinking a trench war of attrition that decimates the ranks of our brave boys, girls and gays might be entirely justified. all the nice boys love a sailor eh meenzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Share Posted January 31, 2010 Leazes is taking a pasting here tbh At least fop was inventive at dodging questions. in your opinion. But I remember idiots like you saying this in the football section a few years ago..... Shame you haven't contributed anything yourself mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Share Posted January 31, 2010 I love this fallacy that at the sight of any cock a gay man will be so overcome with lust he'll not be able to resist having a gobble. Also that the thought of Leazes' shrivelled flaccid member would do anything for anybody ever. fwiw, No, I don't think those in the armed forces are keen on gays in their ranks, but I don't think that means they should be banned from it. If a man (or woman) feels an urge to protect his/her country I don't think something as irrelevant as sexual preference should get in the way. They also didn't want blacks to serve alongside whites... they seemed to have gotten over that bigotry oh noes, logic. faint.gif by the way Leazes? why are you allowed to generalise about Muslims, but any generalised left wing retort is to be ignored? tis you to a tee you're clueless like, but OK I suppose ... so you're not going to answer the question then? not ignored if it makes sense and not defending them do gooder style it's pretty straight forward old man , Why are your generalisations permissible and others' are not? oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42149 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I love this fallacy that at the sight of any cock a gay man will be so overcome with lust he'll not be able to resist having a gobble. Also that the thought of Leazes' shrivelled flaccid member would do anything for anybody ever. fwiw, No, I don't think those in the armed forces are keen on gays in their ranks, but I don't think that means they should be banned from it. If a man (or woman) feels an urge to protect his/her country I don't think something as irrelevant as sexual preference should get in the way. They also didn't want blacks to serve alongside whites... they seemed to have gotten over that bigotry oh noes, logic. faint.gif by the way Leazes? why are you allowed to generalise about Muslims, but any generalised left wing retort is to be ignored? tis you to a tee you're clueless like, but OK I suppose ... so you're not going to answer the question then? not ignored if it makes sense and not defending them do gooder style it's pretty straight forward old man , Why are your generalisations permissible and others' are not? oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooner 243 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 (edited) I love this fallacy that at the sight of any cock a gay man will be so overcome with lust he'll not be able to resist having a gobble. Also that the thought of Leazes' shrivelled flaccid member would do anything for anybody ever. fwiw, No, I don't think those in the armed forces are keen on gays in their ranks, but I don't think that means they should be banned from it. If a man (or woman) feels an urge to protect his/her country I don't think something as irrelevant as sexual preference should get in the way. They also didn't want blacks to serve alongside whites... they seemed to have gotten over that bigotry oh noes, logic. faint.gif by the way Leazes? why are you allowed to generalise about Muslims, but any generalised left wing retort is to be ignored? tis you to a tee you're clueless like, but OK I suppose ... so you're not going to answer the question then? not ignored if it makes sense and not defending them do gooder style it's pretty straight forward old man , Why are your generalisations permissible and others' are not? oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... You don't believe in freedom of speech as laid out by me. Well, thats just too bad, I'm afraid you can fuck off then., because I think you are a deluded twat that knows nothing about the UK and Canada is welcome to you Edited January 31, 2010 by tooner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10793 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... so when you called me idotic, "do-gooder" "intellectual" and so on... those are the kind of name calling done by mature folk? you flip more often than a pancake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... so when you called me idotic, "do-gooder" "intellectual" and so on... those are the kind of name calling done by mature folk? you flip more often than a pancake Despite being well into his 90's Leazes is as bad as anyone for name calling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Share Posted January 31, 2010 oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... so when you called me idotic, "do-gooder" "intellectual" and so on... those are the kind of name calling done by mature folk? you flip more often than a pancake "do gooder" isn't an insult, it happens to be true. Wondered who would get this thread going again......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Share Posted January 31, 2010 oh dear. You are showing your immaturity by resorting to such comments......... so when you called me idotic, "do-gooder" "intellectual" and so on... those are the kind of name calling done by mature folk? you flip more often than a pancake Despite being well into his 90's Leazes is as bad as anyone for name calling I remember a few years ago, you and the likes of you insisted I was wrong about the football club too ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Share Posted January 31, 2010 they miss me on bairns online, they realise now I was one of the few talking sense, and Dave keeps stalking me - he can't stay away from reading what I post on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 (edited) Funny you should say Dave is stalking you, I have noticed you mentioning his name quite a lot recently Edited January 31, 2010 by Gejon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Funny you should say Dave is stalking you, I have noticed you mentioning his name quite a lot recently Newcastle Online is poorer without me, you know it and so does Davey boy and all the rest of the bairns who run it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 1, 2010 Author Share Posted February 1, 2010 Speak of the devil............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 So again, has this anti-British Muslim invasion actually affected you or anyone you know? At all? why do YOU defend them ? You know what they would do to gays don't you ? Not being funny like you're prob a decent bloke but explain ? The armed forces' stance on gays being far more progressive, both institutionally and individually. they are being forced to move with the times, it doesn't mean they are happy with it, but if you think that you wouldn't mind someone looking at your knob and fancying you when they stand next to you in a shower then thats up to you lols-uproarius stuff of course Leazes, but how is that any different to using the showers down the gym/swimming baths? Starting to become clear how you struggle to function in society at all tbh. Like I said earlier, shithead, I've had a good life thanks, I'm quite well off and I have seen enough to realise the bullshit spouted by idealistic geek cunts who have seen fuck all You mentioned the armed forces you thick idiot, not the swimming baths, I'm just telling you that the armed forces may not be happy with gays in it as you suggest. Understand or is this too difficult for you "friends quivering together in the yielding sand with intimate hot limbs in supreme embrace". T.E. Lawrence was a bit of a dandy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Funny you should say Dave is stalking you, I have noticed you mentioning his name quite a lot recently Newcastle Online is poorer without me, you know it and so does Davey boy and all the rest of the bairns who run it It's a scandal Leazes. "Too fuckin right it is". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3860 Posted February 1, 2010 Share Posted February 1, 2010 Have you ever met a Mexican in your life. If 1m yanks died tomorrow, I would feel no more feeling of sympathy than the 150,000 Haitians who have died in the last fortnight. I feel so sad for them people mass deaths, they didn't deserve what has happened. The world clearly cares but as one editorial put it it's a fight to see who can do the most for show. Fuckin wanks. I can't believe you've put a yank link up. Not one person here will ever meet a Mexican, so why put this pathetic link up? Put something relevant to fuckin English people. I don't understand any of it, through calculated ignorance and dismissiveness of them stupid yank bastards. Shame fuckin Russia never nuked the cunts (if they left us alone) in 1961. I was in a lift with 5 of the Mexican national football team in a hotel in San Francisco on my honeymoon does that count? Actually met loads of Mexicansin Disneyworld California. In fact it's pretty impossible to buy a burger in California without meeting a Mexican. Thought that was gonna be a joke like "I was in a lift with the whole mexican national football team"..... I did try and tell them how great NUFC was but I was a bit pissed and they did not have a clue what I was saying. Obviously this was 5 years ago on the honeymoon before Souness took over hence the "NUFC is Great" bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now