David Kelly 1260 Posted May 11, 2009 Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) Has he made any other really good films other than Chinatown (which is admittedly amazing)? Edit; On further investigation it appears I've only seen another three of his films (Rosemary's Baby, Frantic & The Ninth Gate) and while none of them are bad, none of them are close to being great either (appart from having John Cassavettes in RB). Edited May 11, 2009 by David Kelly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Hog 526 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8277176.stm They'll get him in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 Just keep the fucker away from the Haribo in the duty free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46030 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Was it proper rape or statutory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonatine 11542 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, so statutory i think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well she was only 13 and he drugged her then did her up the shitter. According to her at least. You do the math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46030 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 I just wondered cos they called it a sex attack on the radio the other day, and I wasn't sure what the score was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 The charge is surely going to be for proper rape although I suspect he'll just get done for statutory. Great director who's had a fucking nightmare of a life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31203 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) The charge is surely going to be for proper rape although I suspect he'll just get done for statutory. He has already pleaded guilty hadn't he? I don't think he's going to go back on trial for it again, probably get charged for legging it though. Edit: I may be wrong there. Edited September 29, 2009 by ewerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31203 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well she was only 13 and he drugged her then did her up the shitter. According to her at least. You do the math. But apparently she was a 'very experienced' 13 year old, that's his defence anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3973 Posted September 29, 2009 Author Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well she was only 13 and he drugged her then did her up the shitter. According to her at least. You do the math. But apparently she was a 'very experienced' 13 year old, that's his defence anyway. Standard paedophile defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4411 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 It's a strange one in that he did a plea bargain but then the judge backed out - the yanks have said that they admit the judge was dodgy but that doesn't excuse the runner. I think if she'd been 16 or 17 (same law applies) I might have had some sympathy with him but 13 is beyond the pale. I'm also finding all the luvvy outrage at his arrest to be nauseating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 The charge is surely going to be for proper rape although I suspect he'll just get done for statutory. He has already pleaded guilty hadn't he? I don't think he's going to go back on trial for it again, probably get charged for legging it though. Edit: I may be wrong there. He admitted to having sex with her yeah. But I don't think he's admitted to proper rape - pretty certain he said it was consentual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31203 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 I'm also finding all the luvvy outrage at his arrest to be nauseating. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31203 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Most of this was before my time but why hasn't he been ostracised by the film community over this whole affair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46030 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 The charge is surely going to be for proper rape although I suspect he'll just get done for statutory. He has already pleaded guilty hadn't he? I don't think he's going to go back on trial for it again, probably get charged for legging it though. Edit: I may be wrong there. He admitted to having sex with her yeah. But I don't think he's admitted to proper rape - pretty certain he said it was consentual. Think he downgraded that to just sensual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Sensual healing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 And Savlon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15718 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well she was only 13 and he drugged her then did her up the shitter. According to her at least. You do the math. I've always been quick to defend the notion that, the law notwithstanding, you can be both "underage" and consensual - I can't be the only person on here who was, after all - but there's a lot about this case that has never quite sat right. (And I'm not just talking about the lass after he was finished with her.) It's going to be very interesting to see how this plays out, if it ever really does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22001 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Well she was only 13 and he drugged her then did her up the shitter. According to her at least. You do the math. I've always been quick to defend the notion that, the law notwithstanding, you can be both "underage" and consensual - I can't be the only person on here who was, after all - but there's a lot about this case that has never quite sat right. (And I'm not just talking about the lass after he was finished with her.) It's going to be very interesting to see how this plays out, if it ever really does. There was a piece on this on radio 4 the other night. Apparently the current laws are all over the shop; strictly speaking it's illegal for two 15 year olds to grope or snog each other. Which would make most of us criminals I suspect (some people excepted ). I don't have a clue what happened in the Polanski case and I don't want to know either. It's interesting though to hear board members wanting to 'torture him every day for the rest of his life'. Sounds like a really balanced response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31203 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 The 13 year old's grand jury testimony for anyone with the time: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskicover1.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 No reason he should be treated any different to anyone else who does a runner IMHO he can have his day in court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 I'm reading Hammer of the Gods the Led Zeppelin biography at the moment. Turns out Jimmy Page is a filthy rotter who was diddling 14 year old girls on tour. What with Polanski, Woody Allen and Charlie Chaplin I'm starting to wonder if any of my heroes don't have a penchant for underage girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniffer 0 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 At least Jimmy Pages 14 year olds looked 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 I'm reading Hammer of the Gods the Led Zeppelin biography at the moment. Turns out Jimmy Page is a filthy rotter who was diddling 14 year old girls on tour. What with Polanski, Woody Allen and Charlie Chaplin I'm starting to wonder if any of my heroes don't have a penchant for underage girls. The books a good read, Cole and Bonham got up to some mad things with those mini sharks they fished from that Hotel window! Apparently that lass said Page was fairly decent and never got up to anything illegal. If it was going to get him in any trouble I doubt the book would be out. You have to wonder how old the girl in 'Living Loving Maid' is after reading the book like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now