Tooj 17 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. It'll be hard for him to do that when he doesn't get any backing from the owner. Then again will you show him the contempt that you have shown Keegan if that's the case and he goes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norbert Colon 0 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. It'll be hard for him to do that when he doesn't get any backing from the owner. Then again will you show him the contempt that you have shown Keegan if that's the case and he goes? Agree - It was a perfect time for KK to come back after the turgid, insipid dross that souness, Roeder and allardyce had dished up over the previous seasons and it was looking good with him in charge - never underestimate the arrogance and ham-fisted incomptence of the shower of shite that run this club and i will be eternally grateful to shearer IF he takes the job on a full time basis because the alternative is a scarier scenario than smith/mcfaul/charlton/ardiles could ever have cobbled together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 172 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. Like KK did? Well that's obviously IF Ashley wants to ever sell the club I mean and not run it into the ground. I think he genuinely thought he could run it his way and get away with it with Keegan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21037 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. Do you really believe that? I think it'd trigger a riot, but it's not impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. Do you really believe that? I think it'd trigger a riot, but it's not impossible. I wouldn't put it past the current bunch of horse wranglers in charge of the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 172 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. Do you really believe that? I think it'd trigger a riot, but it's not impossible. I think Shearer will be back on the couch with Hansen and Lineker next season, the deluded loons will see Shearer's failure to keep us up as some kind of validation that JFK isn't so bad and will keep him on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. Like KK did? Well that's obviously IF Ashley wants to ever sell the club I mean and not run it into the ground. I think he genuinely thought he could run it his way and get away with it with Keegan. Not convinced he's learnt his lesson. Anyway, I think it's all about staying up and then selling with regard to the possibility of Shearer staying. Without that I don't see Shearer being mad not to stay on (the opposite in fact) or attracting any decent players (as his hands will be tied) even if he does stay on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. Like KK did? Well that's obviously IF Ashley wants to ever sell the club I mean and not run it into the ground. I think he genuinely thought he could run it his way and get away with it with Keegan. Not convinced he's learnt his lesson. Anyway, I think it's all about staying up and then selling with regard to the possibility of Shearer staying. Without that I don't see Shearer being mad not to stay on (the opposite in fact) or attracting any decent players (as his hands will be tied) even if he does stay on. You're probably right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. Like KK did? Well that's obviously IF Ashley wants to ever sell the club I mean and not run it into the ground. I think he genuinely thought he could run it his way and get away with it with Keegan. Not convinced he's learnt his lesson. Anyway, I think it's all about staying up and then selling with regard to the possibility of Shearer staying. Without that I don't see Shearer being mad not to stay on (the opposite in fact) or attracting any decent players (as his hands will be tied) even if he does stay on. You're probably right. I sincerely hope not but y'knaa, that's just the way I see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. What he said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. Like KK did? Well that's obviously IF Ashley wants to ever sell the club I mean and not run it into the ground. I think he genuinely thought he could run it his way and get away with it with Keegan. Not convinced he's learnt his lesson. Anyway, I think it's all about staying up and then selling with regard to the possibility of Shearer staying. Without that I don't see Shearer being mad not to stay on (the opposite in fact) or attracting any decent players (as his hands will be tied) even if he does stay on. You're probably right. I sincerely hope not but y'knaa, that's just the way I see it. The more I think of it the more I think only one of Ashley or Shearer will stay. It must be a marriage of convenience and I imagine they're both pretty wary of each other. I still think it's the right time for Al though. There's no way I'd feel comfortable about him swanning in if we were where we were under Robson (although I can see he would have been a better bet than Souness...that speaks more of how bad a choice he was though). For him to learn the ropes in a lower division and come up with momentum and strength could be an awesome force...I never thought we'd be the lower league club though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. What he said Ashley, Butt, Smith Kinnear, Nolan, R Taylor, Llambias... Where the fuck did our club go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. What he said Ashley, Butt, Smith Kinnear, Nolan, R Taylor, Llambias... Where the fuck did our club go? If we don't stay up you may well be wondering where this club went, never mind the NUFC of not so long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Anyone else think Shearer will dee one and Dowie will take over come the summer? I seriously think JFK will be back. What he said Ashley, Butt, Smith Kinnear, Nolan, R Taylor, Llambias... Where the fuck did our club go? If we don't stay up you may well be wondering where this club went, never mind the NUFC of not so long ago. Ashley, Ashley... Where did our club go? Oh won't you leave Don't you hurt us no more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Shearer is a big name. The only chance we have of not getting relegated and staying there is to build something with him in charge. He'd be mad not to take it, the timing's actually perfect for him. I can see him persuading a much higher standard of player to sign for us compared to Kinnear. Obviously. Like KK did? Well that's obviously IF Ashley wants to ever sell the club I mean and not run it into the ground. I think he genuinely thought he could run it his way and get away with it with Keegan. Not convinced he's learnt his lesson. Anyway, I think it's all about staying up and then selling with regard to the possibility of Shearer staying. Without that I don't see Shearer being mad not to stay on (the opposite in fact) or attracting any decent players (as his hands will be tied) even if he does stay on. You're probably right. I sincerely hope not but y'knaa, that's just the way I see it. The more I think of it the more I think only one of Ashley or Shearer will stay. It must be a marriage of convenience and I imagine they're both pretty wary of each other. I still think it's the right time for Al though. There's no way I'd feel comfortable about him swanning in if we were where we were under Robson (although I can see he would have been a better bet than Souness...that speaks more of how bad a choice he was though). For him to learn the ropes in a lower division and come up with momentum and strength could be an awesome force...I never thought we'd be the lower league club though. Shearer wouldn't take it under Shepherd so I can't see him taking it (long-term) under Ashley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. It was his THIRD FUCKING GAME AS A MANAGER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. Squad limitations I'd say, given it didn't work well against Stoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. It was his THIRD F***ING GAME AS A MANAGER. And? He's only got eight games in all. 1 point from 9 isn't good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. Squad limitations I'd say, given it didn't work well against Stoke. I thought the general concesus was you improved when you went to 3 at the back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. Funny that as they said the opposite on sky. They made the comment that while Shearer has changed formation just before as well as during the game, Kinnear pretty much stuck with the same and played more players out of position. Thing is your mention Stoke, we changed the system during that game as well. Against Spurs, we looked better during the game once that was changed as well. As someone else has already said, its a shame Shearer has to do now what most people do pre-season. Are you saying when the game was going against us he should not be reactive and just leave things as they are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. Squad limitations I'd say, given it didn't work well against Stoke. I thought the general concesus was you improved when you went to 3 at the back. Is this your opinion then or based no what other people said? Slight improvement I'd say brought about by hoying Jonas & Carroll on with the former then combining well with Duff a few times giving us a bit of attacking impetus and the latter scoring the equaliser. So all about the subs really. That and Stoke sitting back a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Has anybody else wondered why Shearer thought a system that worked well against stoke would work well against Spurs? You couldn't get two more different teams in terms of style. His changes only happened when you were getting battered, showing he is reactive rather than proactive. It was his THIRD F***ING GAME AS A MANAGER. And? He's only got eight games in all. 1 point from 9 isn't good enough. Sounds like your start to the season tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.403f4a475ac3bb53997c2626c09ef800.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now