Douggy B 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Interesting how the talbe has panned out to this point. In the top half of the table you have: Chelsea, Arsenal, West Ham, Fulham and Spurs and in the bottom four you have Newcastle, Boro and Sunderland. Normally London teams suffer from the amount of Local Derbies they need to play so are at a disadvantage. Why are teams from the North East underperforming so badly. Weird really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommo 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Interesting how the talbe has panned out to this point. In the top half of the table you have: Chelsea, Arsenal, West Ham, Fulham and Spurs and in the bottom four you have Newcastle, Boro and Sunderland. Normally London teams suffer from the amount of Local Derbies they need to play so are at a disadvantage. Why are teams from the North East underperforming so badly. Weird really. Why do you spend all your time on a Newcastle forum. Weird really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Author Share Posted April 12, 2009 Interesting how the talbe has panned out to this point. In the top half of the table you have: Chelsea, Arsenal, West Ham, Fulham and Spurs and in the bottom four you have Newcastle, Boro and Sunderland. Normally London teams suffer from the amount of Local Derbies they need to play so are at a disadvantage. Why are teams from the North East underperforming so badly. Weird really. Why do you spend all your time on a Newcastle forum. Weird really. Predictable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommo 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Interesting how the talbe has panned out to this point. In the top half of the table you have: Chelsea, Arsenal, West Ham, Fulham and Spurs and in the bottom four you have Newcastle, Boro and Sunderland. Normally London teams suffer from the amount of Local Derbies they need to play so are at a disadvantage. Why are teams from the North East underperforming so badly. Weird really. Why do you spend all your time on a Newcastle forum. Weird really. Predictable. you being on here tonight is also predictable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddy 17 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 its been said before and it will be said again DANNY FUCK OFF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 What a shit wind up thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Assuming you're trying to make a valid point and not fishing, I'd question how serious some of the rivalry is between some of those teams. Is the likes of Fulham-v-Spurs classed as a big rivalry? Aside from that, spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea have spent hugely in the last few seasons. West Ham too. Fulham have a good manager and have made themselves difficult to beat at home. Newcastle have suffered from massive mistakes(off the pitch) this season, and a woeful midfield. Sunderland were left in the shit after Keane walked away again. Middlesbrough are just poor. The chairman seems to continually plough his money into the club, but Southgate has been pretty poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommo 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 What a shit wind up thread yeah i know, why would we be bothered about how badly sunderland and boro are doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 In the top 4 you have Chelsea and Arsenal, in the top 8 you have Chelsea, Arsenal, West 'Am and Fulham. Bringing up the rear you have Spurs. Still you'll always be everyones 7th favourite Cockney team (the big 4 + Charlton + Dagenham & Redbridge). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 I've said before - nobody likes Spurs, not even their own fans. Self loathing, whining little gimps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10963 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 In the top 4 you have Chelsea and Arsenal, in the top 8 you have Chelsea, Arsenal, West 'Am and Fulham. Bringing up the rear you have Spurs. Still you'll always be everyones 7th favourite Cockney team (the big 4 + Charlton + AFC Wimbledon). FYP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 In the top 4 you have Chelsea and Arsenal, in the top 8 you have Chelsea, Arsenal, West 'Am and Fulham. Bringing up the rear you have Spurs. Still you'll always be everyones 7th favourite Cockney team (the big 4 + Charlton + AFC Wimbledon). FYP You're right, 8th favourite cockney team. (big 4,, Charlton, AFC Wimbledon, Dagenham & Redbridge). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Author Share Posted April 12, 2009 Assuming you're trying to make a valid point and not fishing, I'd question how serious some of the rivalry is between some of those teams. Is the likes of Fulham-v-Spurs classed as a big rivalry? Aside from that, spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea have spent hugely in the last few seasons. West Ham too. Fulham have a good manager and have made themselves difficult to beat at home. Newcastle have suffered from massive mistakes(off the pitch) this season, and a woeful midfield. Sunderland were left in the shit after Keane walked away again. Middlesbrough are just poor. The chairman seems to continually plough his money into the club, but Southgate has been pretty poor. Thanks for the serious answer. shame others on here don't have your attitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Assuming you're trying to make a valid point and not fishing, I'd question how serious some of the rivalry is between some of those teams. Is the likes of Fulham-v-Spurs classed as a big rivalry? Aside from that, spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea have spent hugely in the last few seasons. West Ham too. Fulham have a good manager and have made themselves difficult to beat at home. Newcastle have suffered from massive mistakes(off the pitch) this season, and a woeful midfield. Sunderland were left in the shit after Keane walked away again. Middlesbrough are just poor. The chairman seems to continually plough his money into the club, but Southgate has been pretty poor. Thanks for the serious answer. shame others on here don't have your attitude. Ok then, why do you think Spurs are the least successful London Premiership club? Also, while we're on how come only 38% of London clubs are Premiership while 60% of North East ones are? Admittedly, we fail miserably on the pearly king n queen statistics with only 0.0000034% of our attendance being genuine pearly kings compared to your fabulous showing of 1 pearly king to every 4 fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10963 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Assuming you're trying to make a valid point and not fishing, I'd question how serious some of the rivalry is between some of those teams. Is the likes of Fulham-v-Spurs classed as a big rivalry? Aside from that, spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea have spent hugely in the last few seasons. West Ham too. Fulham have a good manager and have made themselves difficult to beat at home. Newcastle have suffered from massive mistakes(off the pitch) this season, and a woeful midfield. Sunderland were left in the shit after Keane walked away again. Middlesbrough are just poor. The chairman seems to continually plough his money into the club, but Southgate has been pretty poor. Thanks for the serious answer. shame others on here don't have your attitude. To be honest Danny, what were you expecting? Chelsea and Arsenal are perennial contenders, which is where they are. West Ham and yourselves are often around mid-table, which is where they are. Sunderland and Middlesbrough can flirt with mid table, but more often than not hover around the bottom of the table and We can be anywhere from Seventeenth to Second depending on where the roller-coaster car is at, in that season. So your "point" is either not a very interesting point or at best, a very poor wum attempt. If Newcastle where around mid table this conversation wouldn't even have been raised... Which lends the casual observer to conclude you were trying to rather unsubtly remark on our league position... almost like your sole joy in life is to try and raise the hackles of Newcastle fans. Who'daguessed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 And dont even get me started on our gor blimey trouser count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Author Share Posted April 12, 2009 Assuming you're trying to make a valid point and not fishing, I'd question how serious some of the rivalry is between some of those teams. Is the likes of Fulham-v-Spurs classed as a big rivalry? Aside from that, spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea have spent hugely in the last few seasons. West Ham too. Fulham have a good manager and have made themselves difficult to beat at home. Newcastle have suffered from massive mistakes(off the pitch) this season, and a woeful midfield. Sunderland were left in the shit after Keane walked away again. Middlesbrough are just poor. The chairman seems to continually plough his money into the club, but Southgate has been pretty poor. Thanks for the serious answer. shame others on here don't have your attitude. Ok then, why do you think Spurs are the least successful London Premiership club? Also, while we're on how come only 38% of London clubs are Premiership while 60% of North East ones are? Admittedly, we fail miserably on the pearly king n queen statistics with only 0.0000034% of our attendance being genuine pearly kings compared to your fabulous showing of 1 pearly king to every 4 fans. The fact that we had the worst start to a season in our history I should imagine. I would say that it is the shear number of clubs that share out great capital city, has lead to some falling by the wayside. Lets face it, when you have the city to yourself you have a captive audience and the benefits that brings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 In the top 4 you have Chelsea and Arsenal, in the top 8 you have Chelsea, Arsenal, West 'Am and Fulham. Bringing up the rear you have Spurs. Still you'll always be everyones 7th favourite Cockney team (the big 4 + Charlton + AFC Wimbledon). FYP You're right, 8th favourite cockney team. (big 4,, Charlton, AFC Wimbledon, Dagenham & Redbridge). You forgot Leyton Orient like. At least Spurs have the distinction of being less distasteful than Millwall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Spurs fans, ''captive''? Right oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Author Share Posted April 12, 2009 Spurs fans, ''captive''? Right oh Oh dear. Re-read needed I think Tommy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flair 0 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 (edited) Obsessed. Edited April 12, 2009 by Attain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 14048 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Subtle as a shotgun blast, Danny, lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Despite our lowly current league position, we STILL mean more to Danny than his own club. We just MATTER as a club and this is why he posts here. We are passionate, exciting. We set the heart racing, fire the imagination. We are the Rolling Stones. Spurs are the Shadows. We are Jimi Hendrix, loud and colourful. Spurs are Kenny G, whiney and pointless. We are Oasis, swaggering and unpredictable. Spurs are Travis, safe and insipid. We are Amy Winehouse. Spurs are Lisa Scott Lee. Carry on posting Danny, we understand why our club has got into your heart. It has that effect. People can't ignore us, it's just not possible. I'm sure somewhere in cyberspace there's a forum for Spurs fans, but what would be the point of posting there? What would there be to SAY?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 There should be a wikipedia article analysing this iyam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norbert Colon 0 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Despite our lowly current league position, we STILL mean more to Danny than his own club. We just MATTER as a club and this is why he posts here. We are passionate, exciting. We set the heart racing, fire the imagination. We are the Rolling Stones. Spurs are the Shadows. We are Jimi Hendrix, loud and colourful. Spurs are Kenny G, whiney and pointless. We are Oasis, swaggering and unpredictable. Spurs are Travis, safe and insipid. We are Amy Winehouse. Spurs are Lisa Scott Lee. Carry on posting Danny, we understand why our club has got into your heart. It has that effect. People can't ignore us, it's just not possible. I'm sure somewhere in cyberspace there's a forum for Spurs fans, but what would be the point of posting there? What would there be to SAY?! Newcastle are the James Dean to spurs Montgomery Clift Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now