Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 (edited) Says John Salako in an interview for talk Sport cited Kevin Keegan as the worst manager he ever played for. Salako was signed for Fulham by Keegan in 1998 but their relationship deteriorated soon afterwards. Salako says that Keegan was tactically inept and didn't know how to best use his players. He also said that Keegan had attempted to sign him for Newcastle at the end of his tenure there. I have always liked Salako, he seems to be one of those rare "intelligent" footballers. Also in the same interview he tells how Gazza defecated in his shorts when they played for England together. Edited March 28, 2009 by Danny B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Says John Salako in an interview for talk Sport cited Kevin Keegan as the worst manager he ever played for. Salako was signed for Fulham by Keegan in 1998 but their relationship deteriorated soon afterwards. Salako says that Keegan was tactically inept and didn't know how to best use his players. He also said that Keegan had attempted to sign him for Newcastle at the end of his tenure there. I have always liked Salako, he seems to be one of those rare "intelligent" footballers. Also in the same interview he tells how Gaza defecated in his shorts when they played for England together. An actual Gaza militant went out of his way to do that to his shorts? That's more interesting than any of that Keegan stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eleven Donkeys Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 john who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Yes, because Keegan was so obviously inept at Fulham. Salako only made 10 appearances there. Much more likely is that he was crap at Fulham (and indeed everywhere, really, but Palace) and so didn't feature, and that he's bitter that Keegan didn't give him any first-team appearances. By the way, fascinating post in defence of Spurs, Danny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Yes, because Keegan was so obviously inept at Fulham. Salako only made 10 appearances there. Much more likely is that he was crap at Fulham (and indeed everywhere, really, but Palace) and so didn't feature, and that he's bitter that Keegan didn't give him any first-team appearances. By the way, fascinating post in defence of Spurs, Danny. excuse me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Yes, because Keegan was so obviously inept at Fulham. Salako only made 10 appearances there. Much more likely is that he was crap at Fulham (and indeed everywhere, really, but Palace) and so didn't feature, and that he's bitter that Keegan didn't give him any first-team appearances. By the way, fascinating post in defence of Spurs, Danny. excuse me? You know what I'm talking about, Mr 'My only reason for posting on here from my phone 24 hours a day is to defend Spurs from all the shite you jealous deluded Geordies talk.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 It's amazing how blinded some people are to Keegan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 It's amazing how blinded some people are to Keegan. It's amazing how much of a total non-starter this 'story' is. There's plenty of negatives about the man, mainly in the 'dealing with pressure' area, but this tactically inept line that's been bandied about the press for more than a decade is just untrue. You know that as well as I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Says John Salako in an interview for talk Sport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Yes, because Keegan was so obviously inept at Fulham. Salako only made 10 appearances there. Much more likely is that he was crap at Fulham (and indeed everywhere, really, but Palace) and so didn't feature, and that he's bitter that Keegan didn't give him any first-team appearances. By the way, fascinating post in defence of Spurs, Danny. excuse me? You know what I'm talking about, Mr 'My only reason for posting on here from my phone 24 hours a day is to defend Spurs from all the shite you jealous deluded Geordies talk.' These are John Salakos words not mine. I am just passing the info on. Making a contribution, try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Yes, because Keegan was so obviously inept at Fulham. Salako only made 10 appearances there. Much more likely is that he was crap at Fulham (and indeed everywhere, really, but Palace) and so didn't feature, and that he's bitter that Keegan didn't give him any first-team appearances. By the way, fascinating post in defence of Spurs, Danny. excuse me? You know what I'm talking about, Mr 'My only reason for posting on here from my phone 24 hours a day is to defend Spurs from all the shite you jealous deluded Geordies talk.' These are John Salakos words not mine. I am just passing the info on. Making a contribution, try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Yes, because Keegan was so obviously inept at Fulham. Salako only made 10 appearances there. Much more likely is that he was crap at Fulham (and indeed everywhere, really, but Palace) and so didn't feature, and that he's bitter that Keegan didn't give him any first-team appearances. By the way, fascinating post in defence of Spurs, Danny. excuse me? You know what I'm talking about, Mr 'My only reason for posting on here from my phone 24 hours a day is to defend Spurs from all the shite you jealous deluded Geordies talk.' These are John Salakos words not mine. I am just passing the info on. Making a contribution, try it. You come across very bitter, are you OK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Could you tell me again how this thread is in defence of Spurs? I think I missed it the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Could you tell me again how this thread is in defence of Spurs? I think I missed it the first time. What part of "making a contribution" are you struggling with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4857 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 dannys on the prowl tonight like twat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 How people keep falling for Danny's cretinous patter is just beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Fuck me, over 2.5k posts? What a sad twat Can't be arsed to do the whole KK discussion again. Tiresome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 dannys on the prowl tonight like twat HA HA HA I have avatars turned off normally because Im at work, is that you? fuck me, how old are you? I would banter with someone your age down the pub, why would I do it on here? Come back when your balls have dropped. Go on run along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Fuck me, over 2.5k posts? What a sad twat Can't be arsed to do the whole KK discussion again. Tiresome. Poor Greg: # GregNUFC # # # Posts 10,258 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 http://dannyb.net/Home.html Says it all really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Salako has an axe to grind. KK was all set to bring him up here, it got to the medical I believe, and Salako bottled it, didn't want to move North. I'm pretty sure Keegan let word get out that Salako had fannied out and was a bit of a soft shite. Special K signed Ginola instead and the rest is history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Tactically inept and still nearly won the league, not bad going really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Salako has an axe to grind. KK was all set to bring him up here, it got to the medical I believe, and Salako bottled it, didn't want to move North. I'm pretty sure Keegan let word get out that Salako had fannied out and was a bit of a soft shite. Special K signed Ginola instead and the rest is history. If that was the case why bring him to Fulham? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douggy B 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Author Share Posted March 28, 2009 Tactically inept and still nearly won the league, not bad going really. "nearly" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Salako has an axe to grind. KK was all set to bring him up here, it got to the medical I believe, and Salako bottled it, didn't want to move North. I'm pretty sure Keegan let word get out that Salako had fannied out and was a bit of a soft shite. Special K signed Ginola instead and the rest is history. If that was the case why bring him to Fulham? Dunno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now