Dr Gloom 21915 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 HTL is like Souness, he's only interested in 'proper' replies. 50258[/snapback] genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 to be fair Luque has played LM for us so far hasnt he? I reckon he's been bought for both if that makes any sense. On the left to replace Robert but an eye on the fact he can also play as a striker too... 50234[/snapback] Of course it makes no sense, it's sensible! I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 (edited) A left-sided attacker plays down the left, simple enough to understand I would have thought. 50212[/snapback] Like Robert, you mean? Thanks. You've got it at last. It's like pulling teeth, son. 50217[/snapback] Weren't you arguing that both Luque and Robert were left-sided midfielders rather than left-sided attackers though? 50223[/snapback] You can label them whatever way you want. What I was saying was that Luque was signed as a replacement for Robert. So whatever label you want to put on that feel free to do so. For myself, I don't care what you call them but to say someone is a 'striker' means a player like Shearer, or Owen. 50253[/snapback] For me Owen and Shearer are totally different types of players, so I'm not sure I follow. 50256[/snapback] Ho ho ho. I'll play along....... The fact you don't follow is probably why you think Shearer, Owen and Luque are all strikers. Has championship manager changed the concept of what a striker is? Perhaps after a few years of championship manager, a player who plays as Robert does, you know, a left sided midfielder/attacker who provides for others, and scores goals as well, is now considered to be a striker in the mould of Shearer and Owen? Edited October 27, 2005 by Howaythelads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 That Jenas is a bling bastard. 50229[/snapback] As racist as anything I've ever posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21615 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 That Jenas is a bling bastard. 50229[/snapback] As racist as anything I've ever posted. 50266[/snapback] So bling's a racist term then? Nooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 89 Posted October 27, 2005 Author Share Posted October 27, 2005 A left-sided attacker plays down the left, simple enough to understand I would have thought. 50212[/snapback] Like Robert, you mean? Thanks. You've got it at last. It's like pulling teeth, son. 50217[/snapback] Weren't you arguing that both Luque and Robert were left-sided midfielders rather than left-sided attackers though? 50223[/snapback] You can label them whatever way you want. What I was saying was that Luque was signed as a replacement for Robert. So whatever label you want to put on that feel free to do so. For myself, I don't care what you call them but to say someone is a 'striker' means a player like Shearer, or Owen. 50253[/snapback] For me Owen and Shearer are totally different types of players, so I'm not sure I follow. 50256[/snapback] Ho ho ho. I'll play along....... The fact you don't follow is probably why you think Shearer, Owen and Luque are all strikers. Has championship manager changed the concept of what a striker is? Perhaps after a few years of championship manager, a player who plays as Robert does, you know, a left sided midfielder/attacker who provides for others, and scores goals some as well, is now considered to be a striker in the mould of Shearer and Owen? 50265[/snapback] come on now HTL I thought you were starting to calm down now every body walk away , there's nothing to see, it was just a misunderstanding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 (edited) IF we had everyone fit, who reckons we'll play 4-3-3 for the majority and who reckons we'll play 4-4-2? I think he might try 4-3-3 at home. 50231[/snapback] Doh! I'd suggest that if Mr Souness goes this route we'll be playing 4-5-1 more than 4-3-3. Also, you claim he might play 4-3-3 at home. So does that mean you reckon he'll play 4-4-2 away and if so how is 4-3-3 going to be used for the majority of the time? Edited October 27, 2005 by Howaythelads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 to be fair Luque has played LM for us so far hasnt he? I reckon he's been bought for both if that makes any sense. On the left to replace Robert but an eye on the fact he can also play as a striker too... 50234[/snapback] Yup, that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 That Jenas is a bling bastard. 50229[/snapback] As racist as anything I've ever posted. 50266[/snapback] So bling's a racist term then? Nooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 50267[/snapback] Exactly. Glad we agree that I haven't posted anything racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 HTL is like Souness, he's only interested in 'proper' replies. 50258[/snapback] genius 50262[/snapback] Why am I not surprised at these small minded responses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 In his career, Luque has been used as a striker who favours the left hand side of the pitch due to the fact that he has an awesome left foot. He drops deeper than Shearer (much like Bellamy did ) but never an out and out left winger. I'm yet to see a quote provided from Souness saying that he was bought as a replacement for Robert. I've seen him say that he will offer us more threat down the left (bearing in mind that he does favour the left hand side striker position) but never that he will be playing on the left wing. I can't understand what this debate is about anyway. Luque IS a striker. If Souness plays him on the left wing rather than up front then he'll confirm that he is in fact an idiot (although that's already been confirmed plenty of times). I'm no fan of Souness at all, but I'm a huge fan of Luque from his time in Spain. If we don't use him properly then he's going to look out of his depth (would anyone really put a striker on the wing? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4378 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 In his recent interview didn't Luque say that Souness had told him he bought him to play on the front left of a 4-3-3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 In his recent interview didn't Luque say that Souness had told him he bought him to play on the front left of a 4-3-3? 50286[/snapback] Yeah, but what does he know about his own position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 In his career, Luque has been used as a striker who favours the left hand side of the pitch due to the fact that he has an awesome left foot. He drops deeper than Shearer (much like Bellamy did ) but never an out and out left winger. I'm yet to see a quote provided from Souness saying that he was bought as a replacement for Robert. I've seen him say that he will offer us more threat down the left (bearing in mind that he does favour the left hand side striker position) but never that he will be playing on the left wing. I can't understand what this debate is about anyway. Luque IS a striker. If Souness plays him on the left wing rather than up front then he'll confirm that he is in fact an idiot (although that's already been confirmed plenty of times). I'm no fan of Souness at all, but I'm a huge fan of Luque from his time in Spain. If we don't use him properly then he's going to look out of his depth (would anyone really put a striker on the wing? ) 50284[/snapback] Can I add fuel to the fire by saying I think he's equally comfortable with his right foot and has in the past played on the right side of midfield! I think I do remember Souness saying something along those lines, I just assumed that was him being bitter and twisted, as usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChocChip 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 IF we had everyone fit, who reckons we'll play 4-3-3 for the majority and who reckons we'll play 4-4-2? I think he might try 4-3-3 at home. 50231[/snapback] Doh! I'd suggest that if Mr Souness goes this route we'll be playing 4-5-1 more than 4-3-3. Also, you claim he might play 4-3-3 at home. So does that mean you reckon he'll play 4-4-2 away and if so how is 4-3-3 going to be used for the majority of the time? 50269[/snapback] First up, i'm guessing at what Souness might do not what i'd do. I think he think's 4-3-3 is a more attacking formation, so does Johan Cruyff by the way. So i think he might try 4-3-3 more at home and maybe away if he thinks he can or if he needs to come back from a goal down. Personally i was interested to see how 4-3-3 might work but after watching the highlights of Manure against Spurs (1st half Manure playing 4-4-2) reminded of how sweet it is to watch an attacking team play 4-4-2 properly. Right now i just care about the results so whatever formation they line up in won't overly concern me as long as we get the points. People say Chelsea are boring but i reckon their fans get plenty of entertainment just looking at the table nevermind going to the match! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordieshandy 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Plenty of Rocky orientated craic here then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44853 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Plenty of Rocky orientated craic here then 50293[/snapback] HTL's got the Eye of the Tiger, if that's any use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordieshandy 0 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Isn't that supposed to be some sort of aphrodisiac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44853 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I fucking hope not. The thought of an amorous HTL is frankly terrifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9772 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 IF we had everyone fit, who reckons we'll play 4-3-3 for the majority and who reckons we'll play 4-4-2? I think he might try 4-3-3 at home. 50231[/snapback] Doh! I'd suggest that if Mr Souness goes this route we'll be playing 4-5-1 more than 4-3-3. Also, you claim he might play 4-3-3 at home. So does that mean you reckon he'll play 4-4-2 away and if so how is 4-3-3 going to be used for the majority of the time? 50269[/snapback] First up, i'm guessing at what Souness might do not what i'd do. I think he think's 4-3-3 is a more attacking formation, so does Johan Cruyff by the way. So i think he might try 4-3-3 more at home and maybe away if he thinks he can or if he needs to come back from a goal down. Personally i was interested to see how 4-3-3 might work but after watching the highlights of Manure against Spurs (1st half Manure playing 4-4-2) reminded of how sweet it is to watch an attacking team play 4-4-2 properly. Right now i just care about the results so whatever formation they line up in won't overly concern me as long as we get the points. People say Chelsea are boring but i reckon their fans get plenty of entertainment just looking at the table nevermind going to the match! 50289[/snapback] Yes, but Cruijf does believe in wingers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3355 Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 Supporting HTL's argument, straight from the horse's mouth piece. NUFC official website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15524 Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 Emre looks like a 70s porn star there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 89 Posted October 28, 2005 Author Share Posted October 28, 2005 Supporting HTL's argument, straight from the horse's mouth piece.NUFC official website 50410[/snapback] well I'll be damned, but dont start spending your winnings just yet HTL, perhaps they're wrong as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads 0 Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 Supporting HTL's argument, straight from the horse's mouth piece.NUFC official website 50410[/snapback] well I'll be damned, but dont start spending your winnings just yet HTL, perhaps they're wrong as well 50414[/snapback] Maybe if it was posted on the nufc.com website people would believe it. Some on here do fawn all over those lot, don't they. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 I've never played championship manager tbqfh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now