Guest alex Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) Aye, sweet Fanny Adams chance of him coming here like. And he'd be hamstrung anyway even if he did. Edited February 17, 2009 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooner 243 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 over-rated. Compared to who? Roeder? Allardyce? Souness? Kinnear? U. J. Cobley? eriksson did shite at city. spent big and had a fucking awful second half of the season. for the amount of money he spent city should have maintained the progress they made in the first half of the season.... and he's not doing too clever with mexico, either. a few games away from the sack apparently.. they (Mexico) lost the first game of this round, against the USA, in USA, with ten men......yep he's crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 How did he do a shite job at City btw? What a load of shite people talk man. It was their best season in ages and I'm sure they'd have done even better this season if they'd stuck with him instead of getting Hughes. He'd have been absolutely perfect for them with the Arabs in charge as well, as I've said before. that's hardly a glowing endorsement considering the resources he had available... a few relegation battles previously under keegan and pearce, a new owner hoys in a huge transfer kitty, brings in a new manager and they do better than previously. hardly surprising, is it?... for the amount of money eriksson spent, you'd certainly expect city to have maintained the progress they made in the first part of the season. overall their season was pretty underwhelming in my opinion , and the second part of the season seemed to fade and invenitably drag apart from the man utd double. they had some fucking rank performances, especially the 8-1 defeat to Boro and 3-2 at home to fulham. for what it's worth, i thought he did very well with england and would have been pleased to see him replace roeder once he left england. however, after seeing what he did with city - which was nothing special in the end - and is now stuttering his way through his time at mexico via a few unconvincing wins, i certainly wouldn't consider him unless he makes a notable turnaround with mexico or does well in another job. the fact he's on the verge of the sack with mexico speaks volumes... i think if ashley is determined to stick to this youth policy he's installed , then i think we should consider a young manager who is not influenced by money. i'd personally give darren ferguson a crack , whether or not he'd want to work with the fuckpig we have in charge and the DoF malarkey is another scenario... yes, he might end up being another paul ince, and if he is, then it wouldn't cost a bomb to fire him off unlike it would for eriksson. unfortunetly however, i think we'll end up with kinnear on a full time basis or a flakey spanish manager who is used to having players bought for him over to you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) I wasn't advocating the appointment of Sven because he'd be a lame duck here. The system and more particularly the personnel are the problem. As for the job he did at City, aye they had some indifferent results but for me, your attitude sums up so much that is wrong with football - i.e. instant results or you're out. And as others have said, he didn't even get a pre-season in. To expect him to have done better is unrealistic. I bet City fans are happy with the job he did. Especially now. Edited February 17, 2009 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I wasn't advocating the appointment of Sven because he'd be a lame duck here. The system and more particularly the personnel are the problem. As for the job he did at City, aye they had some indifferent results but for me, your attitude sums up so much that is wrong with football - i.e. instant results or you're out. And as others have said, he didn't even get a pre-season in. To expect him to have done better is unrealistic. I bet City fans are happy with the job he did. Especially now. if we had a manager spending big money on players, i'd expect to see results sooner rather than later. if we had a manager carefully building a squad and set out a long term plan for success, i'd be prepared to give him time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) I wasn't advocating the appointment of Sven because he'd be a lame duck here. The system and more particularly the personnel are the problem. As for the job he did at City, aye they had some indifferent results but for me, your attitude sums up so much that is wrong with football - i.e. instant results or you're out. And as others have said, he didn't even get a pre-season in. To expect him to have done better is unrealistic. I bet City fans are happy with the job he did. Especially now. if we had a manager spending big money on players, i'd expect to see results sooner rather than later. if we had a manager carefully building a squad and set out a long term plan for success, i'd be prepared to give him time. We've got neither City got results though. They had a good season, especially by their standards, which is the best way to judge them imo. Edited February 17, 2009 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I wasn't advocating the appointment of Sven because he'd be a lame duck here. The system and more particularly the personnel are the problem. As for the job he did at City, aye they had some indifferent results but for me, your attitude sums up so much that is wrong with football - i.e. instant results or you're out. And as others have said, he didn't even get a pre-season in. To expect him to have done better is unrealistic. I bet City fans are happy with the job he did. Especially now. if we had a manager spending big money on players, i'd expect to see results sooner rather than later. if we had a manager carefully building a squad and set out a long term plan for success, i'd be prepared to give him time. We've got neither indeed mate... i reckon we're stuck with that greasy, arse-licking cunt Kinnear for the long-haul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I wasn't advocating the appointment of Sven because he'd be a lame duck here. The system and more particularly the personnel are the problem. As for the job he did at City, aye they had some indifferent results but for me, your attitude sums up so much that is wrong with football - i.e. instant results or you're out. And as others have said, he didn't even get a pre-season in. To expect him to have done better is unrealistic. I bet City fans are happy with the job he did. Especially now. if we had a manager spending big money on players, i'd expect to see results sooner rather than later. if we had a manager carefully building a squad and set out a long term plan for success, i'd be prepared to give him time. We've got neither indeed mate... i reckon we're stuck with that greasy, arse-licking cunt Kinnear for the long-haul. You reckon? I think he's a goner. Literally if he stays, figuratively if he does the sensible thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I wasn't advocating the appointment of Sven because he'd be a lame duck here. The system and more particularly the personnel are the problem. As for the job he did at City, aye they had some indifferent results but for me, your attitude sums up so much that is wrong with football - i.e. instant results or you're out. And as others have said, he didn't even get a pre-season in. To expect him to have done better is unrealistic. I bet City fans are happy with the job he did. Especially now. if we had a manager spending big money on players, i'd expect to see results sooner rather than later. if we had a manager carefully building a squad and set out a long term plan for success, i'd be prepared to give him time. We've got neither indeed mate... i reckon we're stuck with that greasy, arse-licking cunt Kinnear for the long-haul. You reckon? I think he's a goner. Literally if he stays, figuratively if he does the sensible thing aye, ashley thinks the cunt is better than capello. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I don't think he actually thinks that. Although the fact he was so light-hearted about it says how in touch he is with the fans, or not, rather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 personally, i think we missed out here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/e...onf/7894496.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now