stevietoon 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 meeting took place on friday afternoon and the first responses to the Q&A session will be published in tuesday night's chronicle and followed on in wednesday's journal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14021 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Did he answer using interpretive dance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31589 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 No but his answers were written in his own faeces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Did he answer using interpretive dance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3640 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Chances are he only answered any questions that were signed to him because obviously he's a deaf mute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered Still might reveal some idea of where their heads are at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neville Neville Neville 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 A transcript has just been leaked online: Press Officer: Lets begin with the Chronicle Llambias: Which one of you is Lee Ryder? Ryder: I am Llambias: You're a cunt. Press Officer: That concludes the Question and Answer session. Same time next year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neville Neville Neville 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 To be fair he's hardly the chirpiest person in the world. On some sort of 3 day binge moan http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...sult_type=posts no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. sounds like you're the clueless one pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Derg? Pukka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. sounds like you're the clueless one pal. did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC". who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to? why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?.. thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. sounds like you're the clueless one pal. did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC". who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to? why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?.. thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10 What's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCMag 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. sounds like you're the clueless one pal. did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC". who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to? why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?.. thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10 What's your point? that they're clueless, deluded, money grabbing cunts with their heads up their arse.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. sounds like you're the clueless one pal. did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC". who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to? why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?.. thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10 What's your point? that they're clueless, deluded, money grabbing cunts with their heads up their arse.. Have you met any of them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Mackem wind-up, got to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31589 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 To be fair he's hardly the chirpiest person in the world. On some sort of 3 day binge moan http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...sult_type=posts He is a right moaning bastard to be fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Is that right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Mackem wind-up, got to be. That, or the pressure's starting to get to Dennis Wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened. So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like. NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now