Sir David Attenborough bashes the bible

[Jimbo 175]

He has romped with gorillas, turned his back on grizzly bears and found himself knee-deep in suffocating bat dung. After decades of getting to know the furthest-flung corners of the world – and its inhabitants – Sir David Attenborough has vented his ire on the Bible for promoting the belief that man has complete dominion over the Earth.

 

 

Sir David, probably the best-loved broadcaster and certainly the most distinguished television naturalist, has blamed the Book of Genesis for many environmental problems, from the burning down of tropical rainforests to the extinction of species.

 

On the eve of a BBC1 documentary on the life of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution, Sir David has criticised the centuries-old idea running through the Judaeo-Christian tradition which assumes God gave the Earth to man to exploit and use in whatever way he saw fit in order to populate the world.

 

Sir David, 82, said the devastation of the environment has its roots in the first words that God supposedly uttered to humankind, as detailed in Genesis 1:28: "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves upon the earth."

 

An atheist raised in an academic, non-religious family, Sir David said Genesis peddled untruths about how animals and plants appeared on earth and was also at the root of why there was now serious environmental degradation due to the greedy overexploitation of the earth's natural resources.

 

"The influence of the Book of Genesis, which says the Lord God said 'go forth and multiply' to Adam and Eve and 'the natural world is there for you to dominate', [is that] you have dominion over the animals and plants of the world," Sir David said.

 

"That basic notion, that the world is there for us and if it doesn't actually serve our purposes, it's dispensable, that has produced the devastation of vast areas of the land's surface.

 

"Of course it's a gross oversimplification, but that's why Darwinism, and the fact of evolution, is of great importance because it is that attitude which has led to the devastation of so much, and we are in the situation that we are in," he told the science journal Nature.

 

In tomorrow's documentary, Charles Darwin and the Tree of Life, Sir David does not mention the Bible directly but there is an oblique reference to its influence in his concluding statements about the important principles of evolution encapsulated by Darwin in his 1859 book, On the Origin of Species.

 

"Darwin's great insight revolutionised the way in which we see the world ... But above all Darwin has shown us that we are not apart from the natural world – we do not have dominion over it. We are subject to its laws and processes, as are all the other animals on earth to which indeed we are related."

 

Sir David has received hate mail from viewers upset that he does not give God credit in his nature programmes and some correspondence from creationists makes him angry.

 

"Evolution is not just a theory, as many a correspondent writes to me and says. It is a historical fact like any other historical fact and as certain as William the Conqueror landing in 1066, except it's more certain because the evidence for it comes from a much wider range of fact," Sir David said.

 

"All we have to tell us about William are a few bits of paper here or there – not very much at all. For evolution, we have much more evidence," he said.

[Papa Lazaru 0]

I read/saw an interview with him mentioning the hate mail he was getting from some religious nuts and he made a great point about how they wanted him to give god all the credit for any eautiful and amazing creatures he covered in his programmes, not the nasty ones though. And he replied to them mentioning some parasite that exists solely to burrow into the eye of a child (blinding them) to complete its life cycle (can't remember the exact name/details, but that was the gist of it i believe). They're not so keen to give god the credit for those types of creature!

[Fop 1]

I read/saw an interview with him mentioning the hate mail he was getting from some religious nuts and he made a great point about how they wanted him to give god all the credit for any eautiful and amazing creatures he covered in his programmes, not the nasty ones though. And he replied to them mentioning some parasite that exists solely to burrow into the eye of a child (blinding them) to complete its life cycle (can't remember the exact name/details, but that was the gist of it i believe). They're not so keen to give god the credit for those types of creature!

 

Smite the unbelievers!