Jump to content

Big Chef Takes On Little Chef


manc-mag
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Has anyone been watching that slippery Chief Executive cunt? If I was Heston Blumenthal I'd have ripped his fucking head off!

 

Sorry, was watching a documentary on how some middle class folk cheat and steal their way to more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched it last night, the Little Chef boss was a grade-A arsehole. Couldn't stop using management-speak like blue-sky thinking, brainstorming and wow-factor. He didn't have a clue about what the people on the shop floor wanted (customers or staff) and he came across as completely insincere and untrustworthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched it last night, the Little Chef boss was a grade-A arsehole. Couldn't stop using management-speak like blue-sky thinking, brainstorming and wow-factor. He didn't have a clue about what the people on the shop floor wanted (customers or staff) and he came across as completely insincere and untrustworthy.

 

He outdid himself tonight. Turned out they were introducing a new menu anyway (unbeknownst to Heston) and he'd pretty much engineered the suggestions that Blumenthal was experimenting with to co-incide with it. It's a complete marketing con from start to finish.

 

What a fucking company. It deserves to go to ratshit on this evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched it last night, the Little Chef boss was a grade-A arsehole. Couldn't stop using management-speak like blue-sky thinking, brainstorming and wow-factor. He didn't have a clue about what the people on the shop floor wanted (customers or staff) and he came across as completely insincere and untrustworthy.

 

He outdid himself tonight. Turned out they were introducing a new menu anyway (unbeknownst to Heston) and he'd pretty much engineered the suggestions that Blumenthal was experimenting with to co-incide with it. It's a complete marketing con from start to finish.

 

What a fucking company. It deserves to go to ratshit on this evidence.

 

So you're basically saying you'd happily see all those people out of work because you don't like their boss? <_<

Edited by Fop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't watch it Fop. The people who worked there came across as twats as well.

 

So you think everyone that works there is a twat because you watched a TV program? <_<

Edited by Fop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't watch it Fop. The people who worked there came across as twats as well.

 

So you think everyone that works there is a twat because you watched a TV program? <_<

 

Yawn. I didnt say that either fwiw.

 

I said the company deserves to go to ratshit. 'The company' of course is it's shareholders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't watch it Fop. The people who worked there came across as twats as well.

 

So you think everyone that works there is a twat because you watched a TV program? <_<

 

Yawn. I didnt say that either fwiw.

 

I said the company deserves to go to ratshit. 'The company' of course is it's shareholders.

 

The company is also its employees (who are all twats apparently), who you want unemployed by all accounts. :love:

 

 

Do you have something personal against Little Chef (I suspect you must... or maybe bosses? <_<), or do you just tweak your world views by the latest TV program you've seen? :telephone:

Edited by Fop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just say I've studied company law Fop and you haven't. I know what a 'company' is and you don't.

 

Lets just say I studied the nail of my index finger for a second and amazingly (you'll never believe this <_< ) if a "company" goes under the staff don't magically keep their jobs (all twats from TV or not).

 

 

So roll in that bottom lip, you said what you said and it's your own logic. <_<

Edited by Fop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just say I've studied company law Fop and you haven't. I know what a 'company' is and you don't.

 

Lets just say I studied the nail of my index finger for a second and amazingly (you'll never believe this <_< ) if a "company" goes under the staff don't magically keep their jobs (all twats from TV or not).

 

 

So roll in that bottom lip, you said what you said and it's your own logic. :telephone:

Frantic <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just say I've studied company law Fop and you haven't. I know what a 'company' is and you don't.

 

Lets just say I studied the nail of my index finger for a second and amazingly (you'll never believe this <_< ) if a "company" goes under the staff don't magically keep their jobs (all twats from TV or not).

 

 

So roll in that bottom lip, you said what you said and it's your own logic. :telephone:

Frantic <_<

 

Aye several years versus a second and who is right? :love:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just say I've studied company law Fop and you haven't. I know what a 'company' is and you don't.

 

Lets just say I studied the nail of my index finger for a second and amazingly (you'll never believe this :telephone: ) if a "company" goes under the staff don't magically keep their jobs (all twats from TV or not).

 

 

So roll in that bottom lip, you said what you said and it's your own logic. :love:

Frantic <_<

 

He's beyond help, man. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.