Rob W 0 Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 another pop at Lebanon coming up? Really - play ground bullies always picking on the little kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 2, 2010 Share Posted August 2, 2010 (edited) The UN secretary general has announced an investigation into an Israeli raid on a Gaza-bound aid convoy on 31 May which killed nine Turkish activists. It will be led by former New Zealand PM Geoffrey Palmer and outgoing Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and include an Israeli and a Turkish member. The group will begin work on 10 August, Mr Ban said. Israel's cabinet has reportedly agreed to co-operate, but it is not clear to what extent, correspondents say. It's this kind of rapid response and tough action that makes the UN so effective. Edited August 2, 2010 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22145 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) Edited August 3, 2010 by Dr Gloom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 Hitchens cracks Rabbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Ooh, they've got shopping malls. They should be eternally grateful to the Israelis then, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22145 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 it does show that the situation there isn't always quite as awful as the western media makes out though alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 it does show that the situation there isn't always quite as awful as the western media makes out though alex. Tbh Dan, I don't think they make it out to be that bad in general. If anything I think it's largely forgotten about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 it does show that the situation there isn't always quite as awful as the western media makes out though alex. How does a western video with western subtitles by a western blogger posted on a western website show us something not often reported in the west? Shall I edit together footage of US citizens going about their business and having a good time and write sarcastic subtitles about how much they're suffering at the hands of the terrorists? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15716 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Footage from Bridge Street in Warrington five minutes before the IRA bombings would have shown no end of happy consumerism. So fucking what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Did anyone see the debate about Israel on BBC1 on Sunday morning btw? I employed some 'self-censorship' after about 5 minutes but I couldn't help wondering if Suzanna Reid (I think that's her name) put a bit too much emphasis on the 3rd syllable in the phrase 'With all due respect...' No? Just me then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Just you Alex, what a horrific attempt at humour. Interesting story today: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/world/mi...tml?_r=1&hp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 (edited) Has it been mentioned that the UN report has come out on the floatilla attack.... Report of the international fact-finding mission to investigateviolations of international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, resulting from the Israeli attacks on the flotilla of ships carrying humanitarian assistance Conclusion The attack on the flotilla must be viewed in the context of the ongoing problems between the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority and people. In carrying out its task, the Mission was exposed to the depth of conviction on both sides of the correctness of their respective positions. Similar disasters are likely to reoccur unless there is a dramatic shift in the existing paradigm. It must be remembered that might and strength are enhanced when attended by a sense of justice and fair play. Peace and respect have to be earned, not bludgeoned out of any opponent. An unfair victory has never been known to bring lasting peace. 261. The Mission has come to the firm conclusion that a humanitarian crisis existed on the 31 May 2010 in Gaza. The preponderance of evidence from impeccable sources is too overwhelming to come to a contrary opinion. Any denial of this cannot be supported on any rational grounds. One of the consequences flowing from this is that for this reason alone the blockade is unlawful and cannot be sustained in law. This is so regardless of the grounds on which one seeks to justify the legality of the blockade. 262. Certain results flow from this conclusion. Principally, the action of the Israel Defense Force in intercepting the Mavi Marmara on the high seas in the circumstances and for the reasons given was clearly unlawful. Specifically, the action cannot be justified in the circumstances even under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. 263. Israel seeks to justify the blockade on security grounds. The State of Israel is entitled to peace and security like any other. The firing of rockets and other munitions of war into Israeli territory from Gaza constitutes serious violations of international law and of international humanitarian law. But any action in response which constitutes collective punishment of the civilian population in Gaza is not lawful in any circumstances. 264. The conduct of the Israeli military and other personnel towards the flotilla passengers was not only disproportionate to the occasion but demonstrated levels of totally unnecessary and incredible violence. It betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality. Such conduct cannot be justified or condoned on security or any other grounds. It constituted a grave violation of human rights law and international humanitarian law. 265. The Mission considers that several violations and offences have been committed. It is not satisfied that, in the time available, it has been able to compile a comprehensive list of all offences. However, there is clear evidence to support prosecutions of the following crimes within the terms of article 147 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: • Wilful killing; • Torture or inhuman treatment; • Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health. The Mission also considers that a series of violations of Israel’s obligations under international human rights law have taken place, including: • Right to life (art. 6, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights); • Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (art. 7, International Covenant; Convention against Torture); • Right to liberty and security of the person and freedom from arbitrary arrest or detention (art. 9, International Covenant); • Right of detainees to be treated with humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human person (art. 10, International Covenant); • Freedom of expression (art. 19, International Covenant). The right to an effective remedy should be guaranteed to all victims. The mission must not be understood to be saying that this is a comprehensive list by any means. 266. The Mission notes that the retention by the Israeli authorities of unlawfully seized property remains a continuing offence and Israel is called upon to return such property forthwith. 267. The perpetrators of the more serious crimes, being masked, cannot be identified without the assistance of the Israeli authorities. They reacted in a violent manner when they thought that anyone was attempting to identify them. The Mission sincerely hopes that there will be cooperation from the Government of Israel to assist in their identification with a view to prosecuting the culpable and bringing closure to the situation. 268. The Mission is aware that this is not the first time that the Government of Israel has declined to cooperate with an inquiry into events in which its military personnel were involved. On this occasion the Mission accepts the assurances of the Permanent Representative of Israel that the position which he was directed to defend was in no way directed towards the members of the Mission in their personal capacities. It is nonetheless regrettable that, on yet another occasion of an enquiry into events involving loss of life at the hands of the Israeli military, the Government of Israel has declined to cooperate in an inquiry not appointed by it or on which it was significantly represented. 269. The Mission regrets that its requests to the Permanent Mission of Israel for information were not entertained. The reason initially given was that the Government of Israel had established its own independent panel of distinguished persons to investigate the flotilla incident. The Mission was told that for that reason, and also because the Secretary-General had announced the establishment of another distinguished panel with a similar mandate, that “an additional Human Rights Council initiative in this regard [are] both unnecessary and unproductive”. 270. The Mission did not agree with that position and for that reason suggested to the Permanent Representative of Israel that he should direct to the Council and not the Mission a request that the Mission defer submitting its report to permit other enquiries to complete their tasks. The Mission has not received any direction from the Council to date and considers that it would have been obligated to respond positively to any such directive from the Council. 271. In the light of the fact that the Turkel Committee and the Secretary-General’s panel have not concluded their sittings, the Mission will refrain from any remarks which are capable of being construed as not allowing those bodies to complete their tasks “unfettered by external events”. The Mission confines itself to the observation that public confidence in any investigative process in circumstances such as the present is not enhanced when the subject of an investigation either investigates himself or plays a pivotal role in the process. 272. Elsewhere in this report the Mission has referred to the fact that it found it necessary to reinterpret its mandate because of the manner in which the resolution appointing it was couched. It is important in the drafting of matters of the sort that the impression is not given of the appearance of any prejudgment. The Mission took particular care at the first opportunity to indicate that it interpreted its mandate as requiring it to approach its task without any preconceptions or prejudices. It wishes to assure all concerned that it has held to that position scrupulously. 273. All the passengers on board the ships comprising the flotilla who appeared before the Mission impressed the members as persons genuinely committed to the spirit of humanitarianism and imbued with a deep and genuine concern for the welfare of the inhabitants of Gaza. The Mission can only express the hope that differences will be resolved in the short rather than the long term so that peace and harmony may exist in the area. 274. Nine human beings lost their lives and several others suffered serious injuries. From the observations of the Mission, deep psychological scars have been inflicted by what must have been a very traumatic experience not only for the passengers but also the soldiers who received injuries. The members of the Mission sympathize with all concerned and in particular with the families of the deceased. 275. The Mission is not alone in finding that a deplorable situation exists in Gaza. It has been characterized as “unsustainable”. This is totally intolerable and unacceptable in the twenty-first century. It is amazing that anyone could characterize the condition of the people there as satisfying the most basic standards. The parties and the international community are urged to find the solution that will address all legitimate security concern of both Israel and the people of Palestine, both of whom are equally entitled to “their place under the heavens”. The apparent dichotomy in this case between the competing rights of security and to a decent living can only be resolved if old antagonisms are subordinated to a sense of justice and fair play. One has to find the strength to pluck rooted sorrows from the memory and to move on. 276. The Mission has given thought to the position of humanitarian organizations who wish to intervene in situations of long-standing humanitarian crisis where the international community is unwilling for whatever reason to take positive action. Too often they are accused as being meddlesome and at worst as terrorists or enemy agents. 277. A distinction must be made between activities taken to alleviate crises and action to address the causes creating the crisis. The latter action is characterized as political action and therefore inappropriate for groups that wish to be classified as humanitarian. This point is made because of the evidence that, while some of the passengers were solely interested in delivering supplies to the people in Gaza, for others the main purpose was raising awareness of the blockade with a view to its removal, as the only way to solve the crisis. An examination should be made to clearly define humanitarianism, as distinct from humanitarian action, so that there can be an agreed form of intervention and jurisdiction when humanitarian crises occur. 278. The Mission sincerely hopes that no impediment will be put in the way of those who suffered loss as a result of the unlawful actions of the Israeli military to be compensated adequately and promptly. It is hoped that there will be swift action by the Government of Israel. This will go a long way to reversing the regrettable reputation which that country has for impunity and intransigence in international affairs. It will also assist those who genuinely sympathise with their situation to support them without being stigmatized. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcou...RC.15.21_en.pdf Israel reacted by saying the report was "biased and distorted." Edited October 6, 2010 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 A more sensational way of reporting it is that Israel can 'execute' US citizens and still receive wholehearted US support.... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/29/u...a_n_743873.html The US was the only UN nation to oppose the resolution to try troops guilty of violence, 30 in favour, 15 absentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 6, 2010 Author Share Posted October 6, 2010 Israel reacted by saying the report was "biased and distorted." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 The southern command military court convicted two Israeli soldiers on Sunday of using human shields during Operation Cast Lead, Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip, in the winter of 2008-2009. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defe...n-gaza-1.316867 Few days old but since you bumped it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 6, 2010 Author Share Posted October 6, 2010 The southern command military court convicted two Israeli soldiers on Sunday of using human shields during Operation Cast Lead, Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip, in the winter of 2008-2009. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defe...n-gaza-1.316867 Few days old but since you bumped it. Any idea what the punishment is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 20 press ups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 6, 2010 Author Share Posted October 6, 2010 20 press ups With the 11 year old underneath I shouldn't wonder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 (edited) Aljazeera is reporting on an Israeli settler hit-and-run attack by automobile on two young Palestinian boys in Silwan protesting the expansion of Israeli settlements and theft of Palestinian land there. As horrible as the video is to watch - and one hopes the boys are not gravely injured - it is a remarkable simile for what the settlers are doing to the Palestinians. http://www.juancole.com/2010/10/israeli-se...n-children.html Don't watch it if you're squirmish. It is the whole situation crystalised though. An impoverished child throws a stone in defiance....and get's disproportionately mowed down by an israeli settler in what can arguably be called self-defence. Edited October 11, 2010 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3508 Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 They stole my land, burnt my olive trees, destroyed my house, took my water, imprisoned my father, killed my mother, starved us all, humiliated us all. But I am to blame : I shot a rocket back. So they stole more of my land, burnt my olive trees, destroyed my house, took my water, bombed my country... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 11, 2010 Author Share Posted October 11, 2010 Senseless act. I am sick of this world that has stood by for so long and watched this genocide against a people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 they should have stuck with the Saudis after the fall of the Turkish Empire - if only they'd had oil eh??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Anyone seen any good articles on the Palestinian rejection of the latest proposal to freeze the settlements? I only glanced over some; seems they still want a right of return to Israel. Jimmy Carter has been on record saying if they'd relent in that demand then they could get a solid agreement down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norbert Colon 0 Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Senseless act. I am sick of this world that has stood by for so long and watched this genocide against a people. Its incredible that the terrorist atrocities committed against the Palestinians stretching back years have been virtually written out of the history books - it continues without a dissenting word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts