Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Wounded deer attacks hunter who shot him A Missouri hunter bagged a big buck on the second day of firearms season, but the kill caused him a lot of pain. Forty-nine-year-old Randy Goodman said he thought two well-placed shots with his .270-caliber rifle had killed the buck on Nov. 19. Goodman said the deer looked dead to him, but seconds later the nine-point, 240-pound animal came to life. The buck rose up, knocked Goodman down and attacked him with his antlers in what the veteran hunter called "15 seconds of hell." The deer ran a short distance and went down, and died after Goodman fired two more shots. Soon Goodman started feeling dizzy and noticed his vest was soaked in blood. So he reached his truck and drove to a hospital, where he received seven staples in his scalp and was treated for a slight concussion and bruises. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6790 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Wasn't that fella recently seen grass track racing around a Chester-le-Street housing estate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 How many people would hunt, if deer could shoot back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBass 2959 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Pity the deer didn't kill the bastard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smoggeordie 0 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Pity the deer didn't kill the bastard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Oh deer [/stevie] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 How many people would hunt, if deer could shoot back? That's quite frankly the most absurd thing you've ever posted, and that in itself is no mean feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 How many people would hunt, if deer could shoot back? That's quite frankly the most absurd thing you've ever posted, and that in itself is no mean feet. I you a lot, I know. It's still a valid point though, if you understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 No mean hoof, shirley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 On the hoof more like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 How many people would hunt, if deer could shoot back? That's quite frankly the most absurd thing you've ever posted, and that in itself is no mean feet. I you a lot, I know. It's still a valid point though, if you understand it. If I understand it? Fop you don't 'woosh' me as you say, just whenever there's one of your threads I tend to ignore them as quite frankly you're a bit of a dullard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Has Crocodile Dundee II been on lately, out of interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 How many people would hunt, if deer could shoot back? That's quite frankly the most absurd thing you've ever posted, and that in itself is no mean feet. I you a lot, I know. It's still a valid point though, if you understand it. If I understand it? Fop you don't 'woosh' me as you say, just whenever there's one of your threads I tend to ignore them as quite frankly you're a bit of a dullard. If you understood it then you'd well....... understand it (especially in relation to this incident). Clearly you don't, but what am I supposed to do about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Jesus wept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Jesus wept. Indeed, indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Subjective things like this are all a matter of opinion Fop so I won't even try and change your view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Subjective things like this are all a matter of opinion Fop so I won't even try and change your view. So basically you agree that it is not ridiculous and that only not understanding the point would make you think it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Subjective things like this are all a matter of opinion Fop so I won't even try and change your view. So basically you agree that it is not ridiculous and that only not understanding the point would make you think it was. No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Subjective things like this are all a matter of opinion Fop so I won't even try and change your view. So basically you agree that it is not ridiculous and that only not understanding the point would make you think it was. No. So why is it ridiculous if you understand the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Subjective things like this are all a matter of opinion Fop so I won't even try and change your view. So basically you agree that it is not ridiculous and that only not understanding the point would make you think it was. No. So why is it ridiculous if you understand the point? This is too trivial even for me to argue about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 FOP....fuck off and stop trying to turn yet another thread into one of your 'look at me' borefests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 2J's point was it was a ridiculous question. That's all the potential whooshes dealt with. Might have been the first Crocodile Dundee where the kangaroo shot back, come to think of it. Why was it ridiculous? Subjective things like this are all a matter of opinion Fop so I won't even try and change your view. So basically you agree that it is not ridiculous and that only not understanding the point would make you think it was. No. So why is it ridiculous if you understand the point? This is too trivial even for me to argue about. You just daren't answer. (which is fair enough, I wouldn't if I were you ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 FOP....fuck off and stop trying to turn yet another thread into one of your 'look at me' borefests. Why? I make a point someone is and wants to insult me, I respond..... what's wrong with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now