Douggy B 0 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 There are a lot of ill people out there. Why do so many people have difficulty taking things at face value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 It started in a galaxy far far away in another place and at another time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. Shame 666 is a miss translation too, or he could be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Good old Moloch and those slightly kinky Cannanite rituals (alive and well in Americ∂). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4723 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 (edited) I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Edited October 23, 2008 by Andrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4723 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks how exactly is it bollocks then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks how exactly is it bollocks then? If you look in the Bible, the number of the beast is 666. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks how exactly is it bollocks then? If you look in the Bible, the number of the beast is 666. Did they prove the mistranslation to be wrong then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks how exactly is it bollocks then? If you look in the Bible, the number of the beast is 666. Did they prove the mistranslation to be wrong then? Isn't that heavily disputed though? I.e. that in itself (616) was a mistranslation or whatever of earlier manuscripts. I mean, it could be 616, but QI went on like it definitely was when in fact the most widely held belief is that the number in John's original book of Revelations was in fact '666'. The '616' thing is a bit like the Apocrypha (sp?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks how exactly is it bollocks then? If you look in the Bible, the number of the beast is 666. Did they prove the mistranslation to be wrong then? Isn't that heavily disputed though? I.e. that in itself (616) was a mistranslation or whatever of earlier manuscripts. I mean, it could be 616, but QI went on like it definitely was when in fact the most widely held belief is that the number in John's original book of Revelations was in fact '666'. The '616' thing is a bit like the Apocrypha (sp?). No idea, it's all smoke and mirrors and Chinese whispers anyway (look at the English love and charity mistranslation). I just thought that was still dated as the earliest copy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I was told by a religious nutjob years ago while waiting in a queue for a gig that the barcodes on the bottle of water I had and indeed all barcodes translate as "666" - He was so earnest about it and didn't take kindly to my reply that that would make any kind of stock control programs redundant before they were written. Having said that the idea of Satan and/or his minions going to all that bother just to surround us with his number did appeal to me. since the number is 616 as well just makes him especially wrong No it isn't, it's 666. QI is canny good but it talks a right load of shite at times too. aye but since I actually mentioned that I found that out way before QI ever mentioned it, before QI was even on tv in fact thats not the point is it Aye, the source of the bollocks isn't that important, it's more the fact it's bollocks how exactly is it bollocks then? If you look in the Bible, the number of the beast is 666. Did they prove the mistranslation to be wrong then? Isn't that heavily disputed though? I.e. that in itself (616) was a mistranslation or whatever of earlier manuscripts. I mean, it could be 616, but QI went on like it definitely was when in fact the most widely held belief is that the number in John's original book of Revelations was in fact '666'. The '616' thing is a bit like the Apocrypha (sp?). No idea, it's all smoke and mirrors and Chinese whispers anyway (look at the English love and charity mistranslation). I just thought that was still dated as the earliest copy. It is, that's where the controversy comes from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 I always thought it was 666.6 recurring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Speaking of conspiracies - http://www.prisonplanet.com/half-a-million...ic-coffins.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Speaking of conspiracies - http://www.prisonplanet.com/half-a-million...ic-coffins.html *This video is not available.* The plot thickens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 VALIS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 I always thought it was 666.6 recurring. King James never had any truck with decimals - he was a round number man for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of conspiracies - http://www.prisonplanet.com/half-a-million...ic-coffins.html *This video is not available.* The plot thickens. so do some of the posters on here TBH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of conspiracies - http://www.prisonplanet.com/half-a-million...ic-coffins.html *This video is not available.* The plot thickens. so do some of the posters on here TBH Muscle or fat (or cat)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 brain power - lack of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken 119 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 25% think the Illuminati and the Masons are trying to take over the world It's not everyday you hear the word especially in American mainstream media, but the word came up on 3m:14s. It left me a little gobsmacked anyway. http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=902540383&play=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 brain power - lack of Surely the thicker the brain the more powerful? All things being equal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInspiration 1 Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 What's the conspiracy theory - the beliefs or the percentages? You aren't going to start sniggering at illogical beliefs are you ? Good point. Please help logic return to me so I can realise that life is blatantly pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 28, 2008 Share Posted October 28, 2008 The biggest conspiracy of course is christianity. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 28, 2008 Share Posted October 28, 2008 A suspicious 32% are convinced that Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Fayed were murdered. They were murdered. Parky you come out with some utter shite at times... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now