NUSC

[Park Life 71]

You see, for me, that shouldn't be the whole point of the supporters club.

 

Like it or not it's the catalyst for now, in time it will evolve I'm sure.

I think everyone is aware what was the catalyst for its inauguration thanks Parky

 

Well it is the 'whole point' for now. Understand?

The special needs smiley was never so apt. I've bolded what I said before in case you're struggling with the comprehension bit too.

 

I bow to your strong suit.

[JawD 99]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

That statement worries me.

[Park Life 71]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

That statement worries me.

 

 

Like anyone will remember it in 2 weeks time.

[Guest alex]

Aye, because they're so good at alienating themselves from what most fans think no one will take any notice of them soon.

[JawD 99]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

That statement worries me.

 

 

Like anyone will remember it in 2 weeks time.

 

I will. Or at least, when as yet I have not joined the NUSC, its things like this that stop me doing so.

 

We do need a supporters club. But until this is done and dusted, the NUSC is not a supporters club. Its a club who's only aim is to put pressure on the owner to sell.

[Park Life 71]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

That statement worries me.

 

 

Like anyone will remember it in 2 weeks time.

 

I will. Or at least, when as yet I have not joined the NUSC, its things like this that stop me doing so.

 

We do need a supporters club. But until this is done and dusted, the NUSC is not a supporters club. Its a club who's only aim is to put pressure on the owner to sell.

 

Once MA has gone my feeling is it will grow out of this phase and evolve into a more 'normal' supporters club. Of course if it doesn't people will lose interest in it.

[Snake 0]

Aye, because they're so good at alienating themselves from what most fans think no one will take any notice of them soon.

 

I'm guessing that away from the internet most people will be behind them

[JawD 99]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

That statement worries me.

 

 

Like anyone will remember it in 2 weeks time.

 

I will. Or at least, when as yet I have not joined the NUSC, its things like this that stop me doing so.

 

We do need a supporters club. But until this is done and dusted, the NUSC is not a supporters club. Its a club who's only aim is to put pressure on the owner to sell.

 

Once MA has gone my feeling is it will grow out of this phase and evolve into a more 'normal' supporters club. Of course if it doesn't people will lose interest in it.

 

Well, it has to. Or if it doesn't, it wont have a purpose to exist. So the question then would be, the people who are running it now who were focussed on the whole MA thing, do they have in their mind what a true supporters club should be and bring to the fans/club? Or, would it be likely that those involved would change?

[peasepud 59]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

[Guest alex]

Aye, because they're so good at alienating themselves from what most fans think no one will take any notice of them soon.

 

I'm guessing that away from the internet most people will be behind them

Aye, but you envisaged KK and Ashley reaching a compromise.

[Snake 0]

Aye, because they're so good at alienating themselves from what most fans think no one will take any notice of them soon.

 

I'm guessing that away from the internet most people will be behind them

Aye, but you envisaged KK and Ashley reaching a compromise.

 

Couldn't have been impossible

[Optimistic Nut 269]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

[Optimistic Nut 269]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

 

Sorry, I meant "you" as in the NUSC rather than you singularly by the way.

[Snake 0]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

[Guest alex]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

Are you taking the piss now btw?

[Snake 0]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

Are you taking the piss now btw?

 

It was a perfectly reasonable question, stop acting the cunt

[Guest alex]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

Are you taking the piss now btw?

 

It was a perfectly reasonable question, stop acting the cunt

Easy tough guy.

[Happy Face 29]

We got the pints in at half time on Tuesday and the bar was heaving. The boycott seems to have dwindled on that front, though I couldn't say how much worse off program and club shop sales are these days.

 

The insistence that Ashley must go is childish petulance if you ask me. In 2 months the transfer window opens, and for the good of the club NUSC are going to have to consider an olive branch being extended to Ashley to send the message that our squad MUST be strengthened if it's going to avoid relegation. If needs be, the pursual of a buyer should go on the back burner until survival is guaranteed.

[Optimistic Nut 269]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

Are you taking the piss now btw?

 

It was a perfectly reasonable question, stop acting the cunt

 

How the hell's that a reasonable question, when the bloke who set up the first meeting is saying what I quoted in the original quote?

[ewerk 31594]

NUSC are going to have to consider an olive branch being extended to Ashley to send the message that our squad MUST be strengthened if it's going to avoid relegation. If needs be, the pursual of a buyer should go on the back burner until survival is guaranteed.

 

I don't think that NUSC will affect Ashley's actions in any way whatsoever.

[Guest alex]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

Are you taking the piss now btw?

 

It was a perfectly reasonable question, stop acting the cunt

 

How the hell's that a reasonable question, when the bloke who set up the first meeting is saying what I quoted in the original quote?

[Happy Face 29]

NUSC are going to have to consider an olive branch being extended to Ashley to send the message that our squad MUST be strengthened if it's going to avoid relegation. If needs be, the pursual of a buyer should go on the back burner until survival is guaranteed.

 

I don't think that NUSC will affect Ashley's actions in any way whatsoever.

 

Are you saying it should be scrapped then?

 

I'm not saying Ashley has to sit in a room and be made to listen, just that the NUSC should publicly show they have the best interest of the club at heart and come up with constructive ideas to move us forward.

 

Continuing to stamp our feet and refusing to budge on Ashley's tenure is strangling the life out of the club.

[Guest alex]

NUSC are going to have to consider an olive branch being extended to Ashley to send the message that our squad MUST be strengthened if it's going to avoid relegation. If needs be, the pursual of a buyer should go on the back burner until survival is guaranteed.

 

I don't think that NUSC will affect Ashley's actions in any way whatsoever.

Tbh, how can they hope to do so when they have no dialogue with the club and such a rigid anti-Ashley stance?

HF's right about the priorities as well.

[Snake 0]

Michael Martin, who organised the first meeting, also stressed the need to carry on the action.

 

He said: “It’s the whole point of this club to pressure Ashley to sell.

 

“We have got to make a stand. If we don’t have the boycott then we haven’t got a campaign.”

 

Why not turn up and ask them exactly why they're continuing with the boycott

 

I can see from their pathetic press statements why they are.

 

Also, I don't agree with the BNP, but I wouldn't go along to one of their meetings saying, "But really, why DO you want Asians out of the country?"

But you see that is where you fall down in your argument, the BNP are an organisation with set objectives we are not. We will always go with what the majority of our members want, that was the whole reason for last night. Not joining because you don't believe in what we're currently saying but then shouting about it on here is rubbish and you know it is.

 

If you'd have come to the meeting you would know that report is not in any way a good representation of the nights discussions. You would also know that other members of the committee including myself put forward differing views and at the end of it we had a democratic vote as to what should happen. Even the result of that vote has not been reported properly.

 

Yes club spokesman Michael Teasdale did say that but it was his personal view in a private meeting and NOT a press statement. Its not rocket science O-N, come to the meetings and make your view heard but don't use the excuse that you don't agree with us as to why you won't go.

 

My view is hardly going to affect your opinions and motives, so that's why I don't bother with it. It was clear from day one what the aims of the NUSC was, I don't agree, so I don't go. Pretty simple really.

What are they?

Are you taking the piss now btw?

 

It was a perfectly reasonable question, stop acting the cunt

 

How the hell's that a reasonable question, when the bloke who set up the first meeting is saying what I quoted in the original quote?

 

I was asking you what you thought their aims were from day one

[Snake 0]

Does anyone know any of the main men personally?