Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse...

[sammynb 3161]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

Seriously I've just realised why you get so much shit from other people and your posts are generally ignored.

[spongebob toonpants 3854]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

FACT

[NJS 4256]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

What if Keegan did like Zayette and asked them to sign him and then they refused or failed for whatever reason?

 

That constitutes "final say" in one sense but still leaves the player unsigned.

[sammynb 3161]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

What if Keegan did like Zayette and asked them to sign him and then they refused or failed for whatever reason?

 

That constitutes "final say" in one sense but still leaves the player unsigned.

 

Oh don't say that NJS, that doesn't work for the anti Keegan propaganda Baggio is paid to preach.

[Douggy B 0]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

What if Keegan did like Zayette and asked them to sign him and then they refused or failed for whatever reason?

 

That constitutes "final say" in one sense but still leaves the player unsigned.

 

Oh don't say that NJS, that doesn't work for the anti Keegan propaganda Baggio is paid to preach.

 

Whos paying him? Ashley? The press?

 

Boycoutt everything!! justice for the fans of NUFC!!

[Baggio 0]

Or that Keegan did have a say in players coming and going until Xisco and Nacho were brought in without his say so at the end of the window for whatever reason.

 

Baggio, cunt, you're starting to piss me off.

Either put up or shut the fuck up!

 

Back what up?

 

Keegan having a say in players coming in? It's obvious that his opinion was taken into account, why get him to draw up a list of potential targets if he had no say at all? Why take him to France to have a look at Bafetimbi Gomis if his opinion meant nothing? Why have players on loan for the manager to have a look at if they didn't care what he thought of them? If Keegan didn't have a say then why are Smith and Barton still here?

 

He clearly had a say up until the end of the window when they went over his head and signed Xisco and Nacho, all I'm interested in is the reason they thought they had to go over his head to get players in, perhaps Keegan was turning down all of the players they came up with in the hope that he could force a showdown with Ashley where he could deliver his "him or me" ultimatum regarding Wise?

 

Either way you're quite clearly clueless and just follow the majority you thick, Aussie fuckpig.

[Baggio 0]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

What if Keegan did like Zayette and asked them to sign him and then they refused or failed for whatever reason?

 

That constitutes "final say" in one sense but still leaves the player unsigned.

 

Why would they refuse to sign a player on loan in a position we're short on that the manager is happy with? It's not as if he'd break the bank in wages as he's signed for Hull.

 

It's just so obvious yet people are just desperate to defend Keegan of any wrong doing whatsoever.

[ewerk 29491]

He clearly had a say up until the end of the window when they went over his head and signed Xisco and Nacho

 

Really? Apart from Guthrie I wouldn't have thought any of the others were Keegan signings, he perhaps agreed to them but that if he hadn't then who knows whether the board would have listened to him.

[Baggio 0]

He clearly had a say up until the end of the window when they went over his head and signed Xisco and Nacho

 

Really? Apart from Guthrie I wouldn't have thought any of the others were Keegan signings, he perhaps agreed to them but that if he hadn't then who knows whether the board would have listened to him.

 

So do you think Keegan had a say on Bassong then? A player in a similar position to Zayatte in that he came here for the manager to have a look at him?

 

Also if Keegan didn't have a say then why didn't he walk when he first realised this rather than wait until the window closed?

[spongebob toonpants 3854]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

What if Keegan did like Zayette and asked them to sign him and then they refused or failed for whatever reason?

 

That constitutes "final say" in one sense but still leaves the player unsigned.

 

Why would they refuse to sign a player on loan in a position we're short on that the manager is happy with? It's not as if he'd break the bank in wages as he's signed for Hull.

 

It's just so obvious yet people are just desperate to defend Keegan of any wrong doing whatsoever.

 

 

The only thing that is obvious is your anti-keegan agenda

[ewerk 29491]

Also if Keegan didn't have a say then why didn't he walk when he first realised this rather than wait until the window closed?

 

My guess is that he was being led on by Wise & Co. telling him that they were working on his deals and promising to sign his targets before the end of the transfer window but it was only towards the very end that Keegan realised that this was definitely not the case.

[NJS 4256]

So players were brought into the club on trial for Keegan to have a look at but he had no say on if he wanted them at the club or not?

 

What would be the point in them having a trial then?

 

See again you're spinning the same PR bullshit the club churns out.

Players have been trialled by the club but we all know Keegan wasn't the one making the decisions.

Or do you have proof to the contrary?

 

By the way you typing out more club propaganda doesn't constitute fact.

 

So the club have players in on trial for the manager to look at but he has no say on whether the club signs him or not, that decision is down to the London mafia who were widely reported to not even be in the country at the time so couldn't have seen him train anyway.

 

You couldn't make it up.

 

 

What if Keegan did like Zayette and asked them to sign him and then they refused or failed for whatever reason?

 

That constitutes "final say" in one sense but still leaves the player unsigned.

 

Why would they refuse to sign a player on loan in a position we're short on that the manager is happy with? It's not as if he'd break the bank in wages as he's signed for Hull.

 

It's just so obvious yet people are just desperate to defend Keegan of any wrong doing whatsoever.

 

 

Maybe refuse was the wrong word - unless by then they had a deliberate agenda to piss him off which though I've never thought of it before, is possible.

 

Maybe Hull did offer more money and the deal failed for "normal" reasons - if this is so then your agenda against Keegan is just as desperate.

[Fop 1]