Fop 1 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 £12m! It's a joke, but I like it! Even the Milner fanboys at .com should be pleased with that. Just goes to show how ridiculously overrated English players are. Yup, but it might seem cheap if we end have having a loan player from Hartlepool playing there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 So long as we are doing what seems to have been done to us. agree the fee then add on any sell on so we still get our full cost-ish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 The Times reports 12 million, get in.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/foo...icle4632365.ece 12m for Milner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bias 3 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 I wonder how much Leeds are getting. £2m maybe? by the looks of it about that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7083 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 "While the fee is a sizeable one, Newcastle's squad is already down in numbers from last season and the club have struggled to bring in new signings this summer" there had fucking well BETTER be three good signings coming through the fucking window for fucks sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 I wonder how much Leeds are getting. £2m maybe? They would have got 2m on the 8m so probs a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 "While the fee is a sizeable one, Newcastle's squad is already down in numbers from last season and the club have struggled to bring in new signings this summer" there had fucking well BETTER be three good signings coming through the fucking window for fucks sake. Our effective squad (ignoring current injuries) stands at around 20. Not great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bias 3 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 "While the fee is a sizeable one, Newcastle's squad is already down in numbers from last season and the club have struggled to bring in new signings this summer" there had fucking well BETTER be three good signings coming through the fucking window for fucks sake. Our effective squad (ignoring current injuries) stands at around 20. Not great. No it is not great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21939 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1217 Posted August 29, 2008 Author Share Posted August 29, 2008 "While the fee is a sizeable one, Newcastle's squad is already down in numbers from last season and the club have struggled to bring in new signings this summer" there had fucking well BETTER be three good signings coming through the fucking window for fucks sake. Our effective squad (ignoring current injuries) stands at around 20. Not great. depressing, despite doing well in our last 3 games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Will everybody shut the fuck up about getting players in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21939 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 "While the fee is a sizeable one, Newcastle's squad is already down in numbers from last season and the club have struggled to bring in new signings this summer" there had fucking well BETTER be three good signings coming through the fucking window for fucks sake. Our effective squad (ignoring current injuries) stands at around 20. Not great. depressing, despite doing well in our last 3 games aye. a few injuries and it isn't looking too clever is it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13882 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 £12 million of the Queen's English pounds? Didn't realise we had Dick Turpin conducting our transfers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bias 3 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. Oh god i forgot bout him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21939 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. thank christ. i'll sleep easy tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21939 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Will everybody shut the fuck up about getting players in. one or two signings and there will be dancing in the streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. thank christ. i'll sleep easy tonight Well, last summer you were saying you were happy with him being 3rd or 4th choice striker. Glad you've wised-up though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7083 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. thank christ. i'll sleep easy tonight I DOUBLY won't FFS Kashley better sort this out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 "While the fee is a sizeable one, Newcastle's squad is already down in numbers from last season and the club have struggled to bring in new signings this summer" there had fucking well BETTER be three good signings coming through the fucking window for fucks sake. Our effective squad (ignoring current injuries) stands at around 20. Not great. depressing, despite doing well in our last 3 games aye. a few injuries and it isn't looking too clever is it If you consider how many we've regularly had out due to injury at one time over the years (and even how many we have now + Barton's suspension), it's terrifying. When Keegan left we had double the number of senior professionals on the books (which admittedly was far to far the other way, especially quality-wise). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9796 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Ideally Milner should be replaced with a better player, but I think there are other positions where the lack in depth is more worrying. N'Zogbia and Jonas would be my first choice wingers anyway with the likes of Duff, Geremi and Lua Lua at least providing some sort of backup options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 £12m??? Tough call on what was better business, this or the £13m we got for Woodgate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21939 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. thank christ. i'll sleep easy tonight Well, last summer you were saying you were happy with him being 3rd or 4th choice striker. Glad you've wised-up though. i was but he's hardly played or scored a goal since then so i wouldn't lose any sleep if he were replaced. at the time i was saying that he was as good a 4th choice striker as alan smith, so why splash out that much on smudger? people here were saying smith was a good buy - you included. i knew from day dot that he was no better than shola. shola's still no worse than alan smith mind. i'd get rid of both of them if we could. shola's had enough chances now for me and smith was obvioulsy never good enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 (edited) it's still a decrnt profit on a player that never really fulfilled his potential. he still could like, but i don't think he'll ever do it as a wide player. he must be replaced though - that's essential. i think we needed three players. now we need four if milner goes. It's ok, we've still got Shola as cover. thank christ. i'll sleep easy tonight Well, last summer you were saying you were happy with him being 3rd or 4th choice striker. Glad you've wised-up though. i was but he's hardly played or scored a goal since then so i wouldn't lose any sleep if he were replaced. at the time i was saying that he was as good a 4th choice striker as alan smith, so why splash out that much on smudger? people here were saying smith was a good buy - you included. i knew from day dot that he was no better than shola. shola's still no worse than alan smith mind. i'd get rid of both of them if we could. shola's had enough chances now for me and smith was obvioulsy never good enough Tbf, I said Smith was good cover and expensive but better than we had as cover, i.e. Shola. Which is why I brought it up. You actually said you'd be happy with him as 3rd or 4th striker btw. Edited August 29, 2008 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2bias 3 Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Ideally Milner should be replaced with a better player, but I think there are other positions where the lack in depth is more worrying. N'Zogbia and Jonas would be my first choice wingers anyway with the likes of Duff, Geremi and Lua Lua at least providing some sort of backup options. Midfield we do have sorta some numbers ( i guess 5 isnt alot ) but i think mainly its quality. lualua is unproven and lacks experience where n'zogbia has been unconvincing of late. duff has been performing well of late but he is very injury prone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now