Lucky he wasn't Brazilian and didn't panic.

[Park Life 71]

Sir Michael Wright. ha ha..

[Fop 1]

That's about as close to an unlawful killing verdict as they were allowed to give then.

[Guest alex]

I think one can empathise with the police and the pressure they were under at the time. They've let themselves down badly with all the lies and covering up about what happened though.

[Park Life 71]

That's about as close to an unlawful killing verdict as they were allowed to give then.

 

They can make a disco hit out of it for all I care, these judgments mean fuck all. A veneer is all. THe war is on all levels.

[Guest alex]

The terrorists are the real people to blame for what happened mind.

[Park Life 71]

The terrorists are the real people to blame for what happened mind.

 

Mi6?

[Guest alex]

The terrorists are the real people to blame for what happened mind.

 

Mi6?

No, this was a direct result of the 7/7 bombers. I'm not saying that exonerates the police of responsibility by any means however.

[Fop 1]

I think one can empathise with the police and the pressure they were under at the time. They've let themselves down badly with all the lies and covering up about what happened though.

 

Aye, I don't think you can really blame the people that actually shot him, criminally at least (whether they should remain in the same jobs though ), even though they could/should have done things better/properly.

 

The real issue is the blatant cover up that rolled almost immediately into place (and still rolled on in this enquiry) and that NO ONE at any level has taken any real proportion of blame at all.

 

It's been a master-class in the art of disappearing responsibility and not my fault-ism.

 

 

 

Which is just plain repellent, and of course means that it's likely that in a similar situation the same mistakes might well be make again.

[Park Life 71]

The terrorists are the real people to blame for what happened mind.

 

Mi6?

No, this was a direct result of the 7/7 bombers. I'm not saying that exonerates the police of responsibility by any means however.

 

Yes Mi6.

[Park Life 71]

I think one can empathise with the police and the pressure they were under at the time. They've let themselves down badly with all the lies and covering up about what happened though.

 

Aye, I don't think you can really blame the people that actually shot him, criminally at least (whether they should remain in the same jobs though ), even though they could/should have done things better/properly.

 

The real issue is the blatant cover up that rolled almost immediately into place (and still rolled on in this enquiry) and that NO ONE at any level has taken any real proportion of blame at all.

 

It's been a master-class in the art of disappearing responsibility and not my fault-ism.

 

 

 

Which is just plain repellent, and of course means that it's likely that in a similar situation the same mistakes might well be make again.

 

 

They let him get to the tube station and then they shot him.

[Happy Face 29]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

Edited December 12, 2008 by Happy Face

[Guest alex]

The terrorists are the real people to blame for what happened mind.

 

Mi6?

No, this was a direct result of the 7/7 bombers. I'm not saying that exonerates the police of responsibility by any means however.

 

Yes Mi6.

Grow up man.

[Fop 1]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

[Happy Face 29]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

[Fop 1]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

[Happy Face 29]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

 

But I didn't.

 

That's why I put it in quotes, see. It was other people that said it.

[Fop 1]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

 

But I didn't.

 

That's why I put it in quotes, see. It was other people that said it.

 

So you think 9/11 didn't change anything?

[Happy Face 29]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

 

But I didn't.

 

That's why I put it in quotes, see. It was other people that said it.

 

So you think 9/11 didn't change anything?

 

I think 9/11 didn't change everything.

[Fop 1]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

 

But I didn't.

 

That's why I put it in quotes, see. It was other people that said it.

 

So you think 9/11 didn't change anything?

 

I think 9/11 didn't change everything.

Ah but with your Christian Neo-Con beliefs you would say that.

[Meenzer 15872]

How many threads does it take to ruin a forum?

[Fop 1]

How many threads does it take to ruin a forum?

It's funny but they really don't like it up them, do they?

[Happy Face 29]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

 

But I didn't.

 

That's why I put it in quotes, see. It was other people that said it.

 

So you think 9/11 didn't change anything?

 

I think 9/11 didn't change everything.

Ah but with your Christian Neo-Con beliefs you would say that.

 

I would say it did or I would say it didn't? You're contradicting yourself in your desparation for attention.

 

I'm happpy to waste a Friday afternoon debating with you, if you have a coherent point of view. Otherwise I'll just go back to ignoring your weak 'jokes'.

[Meenzer 15872]

How many threads does it take to ruin a forum?

It's funny but they really don't like it up them, do they?

Do make yourself a little trophy for every time you "win"?

[Fop 1]

How many threads does it take to ruin a forum?

It's funny but they really don't like it up them, do they?

Do make yourself a little trophy for every time you "win"?

No I just have a little smile for every time someone gets annoyed over something everyone else (or Happy, Chezzy & Manc-Foplite and others anyway) does.

[Fop 1]

Anyone see question time where they started saying it's the terrorists to blame for the Stanstead palava during the week.

 

Boiled my piss.

 

Given that it's already illegal to protest within a mile of the houses of parliment, now they're trying to stop other means of protest on the grounds of a terrorist threat.

 

How come mainland Britain went 30 years under terrorist attacks without an effect on liberty?

 

The Neo-Conlabourists weren't in power then.

 

I've no doubt whatsoever the Conservatives would be towing the same line if they were in power when "nine eleven changed everything".

 

With your Christian Neo-Con leanings you would say that.

 

But I didn't.

 

That's why I put it in quotes, see. It was other people that said it.

 

So you think 9/11 didn't change anything?

 

I think 9/11 didn't change everything.

Ah but with your Christian Neo-Con beliefs you would say that.

 

I would say it did or I would say it didn't? You're contradicting yourself in your desparation for attention.

 

I'm happpy to waste a Friday afternoon debating with you, if you have a coherent point of view. Otherwise I'll just go back to ignoring your weak 'jokes'.

That's the beauty of Christian Neo-Con beliefs, they don't have to make any sense, so I guess that's your attraction.