LeazesMag 0 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/footbal...ban-855315.html that should take care of 99.9% of clubs taking part ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 whatever happened to these people just sorting out the draws for competitions etc? Who is Platini to decide how clubs run themselves? its a business same as any other. If one computer company decides to go into debt to chase a massive contract then so be it, they wouldnt be penalised for doing it. le wanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30638 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 whatever happened to these people just sorting out the draws for competitions etc? Who is Platini to decide how clubs run themselves? its a business same as any other. If one computer company decides to go into debt to chase a massive contract then so be it, they wouldnt be penalised for doing it. le wanker Well (and I'm not saying this would work) I guess it's more to do with trying to level the playing field a bit. Wigan (or Leeds even) could never do what Man U can do or Chelsea (for different reasons). Having said that it is hardly a new phenomena as some Spanish and Italian clubs have been using genuinely dodgy practices to fund themselves for many decades now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Platini has bee spot on about practically every issue so far IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Platini is such a tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 does this mean european entry is going to be based on financial position instead of league position? like instead of teams finishing in position 1 2 3 4 going into the champs league itll be teams 3 5 6 8? what about uefa cup qualification? teams 9 11 12 14? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 does this mean european entry is going to be based on financial position instead of league position? like instead of teams finishing in position 1 2 3 4 going into the champs league itll be teams 3 5 6 8? what about uefa cup qualification? teams 9 11 12 14? I think that's it exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Platini is such a tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SloopJohn 0 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Platini is such a tool. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Platini has bee spot on about practically every issue so far IMO. Sounds like you're clearly living in some sort of parallel universe tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richg 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 I'm starting to get more disillusioned by football each year - how far from reality can it actually get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben7 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 In some form such a rule will come into play sooner or later. Of corse in the short term that might result in less of the "same as every year" prestigous european clubs taking part, but for the longterm it can only be GOOD for the whole game, all clubs & fans. and a final word. I don't care if it violents any current laws from the EU or whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. exactly. Then the usual swipe follows which completely contradicts yourself. Debt free business or Champions League football ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Platini has bee spot on about practically every issue so far IMO. Sounds like you're clearly living in some sort of parallel universe tbh Well you're never going to agree with something that may hurt Man U are you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 In some form such a rule will come into play sooner or later. Of corse in the short term that might result in less of the "same as every year" prestigous european clubs taking part, but for the longterm it can only be GOOD for the whole game, all clubs & fans. and a final word. I don't care if it violents any current laws from the EU or whatsoever. It's pretty much obscene and I'm just waiting to see the first club to win the CL carrying a billion pounds of debt...Cause that is where it is leading if some parity or sensible measures aren't put in place. At the heart of a lot of MP stuff is the ideal of making footie more competitive and to keep in touch at least on some levels with the grassroots. Players getting paid £5m a year doesn't make the game more of a spectacle and that player is no better than his counterpart in the past who got paid £1/2m a year, or the obscene transfer fees..Some of the money changing hands for average players is laughable. Even if small things can be done to move the game a little away from money and more towards real competition the better. 100% behind Platini on this debt thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30638 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. exactly. Then the usual swipe follows which completely contradicts yourself. Debt free business or Champions League football ? As I said before, it's not black and white, certain levels of manageable debt are fine, what we had when Ashley took over was not manageable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 difficult to know what to do though, and it would need the clubs themselves to back it - or the majority anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. exactly. Then the usual swipe follows which completely contradicts yourself. Debt free business or Champions League football ? As I said before, it's not black and white, certain levels of manageable debt are fine, what we had when Ashley took over was not manageable. Well, the stadium debt was well structured and financed, all the experts have said this. If you are talking about cutting the wage bill, then cutting wages of current players is not the way to go, and neither is allowing the best players to go elsewhere for more money. Catch 22 , in the real world. Do you want Champions League football or not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. exactly. Then the usual swipe follows which completely contradicts yourself. Debt free business or Champions League football ? As I said before, it's not black and white, certain levels of manageable debt are fine, what we had when Ashley took over was not manageable. Well, the stadium debt was well structured and financed, all the experts have said this. If you are talking about cutting the wage bill, then cutting wages of current players is not the way to go, and neither is allowing the best players to go elsewhere for more money. Catch 22 , in the real world. Do you want Champions League football or not ? Clearly losing £1m every month was the right way to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30638 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. exactly. Then the usual swipe follows which completely contradicts yourself. Debt free business or Champions League football ? As I said before, it's not black and white, certain levels of manageable debt are fine, what we had when Ashley took over was not manageable. Well, the stadium debt was well structured and financed, all the experts have said this. If you are talking about cutting the wage bill, then cutting wages of current players is not the way to go, and neither is allowing the best players to go elsewhere for more money. Catch 22 , in the real world. Do you want Champions League football or not ? Why don't you ask that to the fans of Leeds Utd? Things had spiralled out of control under Freddy, surely you'll agree that we had (and still have) too many average players on huge, undeserved wages. We were heading for a meltdown, we would've been forced to sell players at huge knock downs because of their wages and I really dread to think what would've happened after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 I don't think Platini is talking specifically about expansion debts at all. It is normal to borrow to expand facilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 (edited) Complete and utter bollocks, it's factors such as the CL which have seen football turned into a business and businesses carry debt, no big fucking deal. It'd be interesting to see how much NUFC is technically 'in debt' to Mike Ashley. exactly. Then the usual swipe follows which completely contradicts yourself. Debt free business or Champions League football ? As I said before, it's not black and white, certain levels of manageable debt are fine, what we had when Ashley took over was not manageable. Well, the stadium debt was well structured and financed, all the experts have said this. If you are talking about cutting the wage bill, then cutting wages of current players is not the way to go, and neither is allowing the best players to go elsewhere for more money. Catch 22 , in the real world. Do you want Champions League football or not ? Why don't you ask that to the fans of Leeds Utd? Things had spiralled out of control under Freddy, surely you'll agree that we had (and still have) too many average players on huge, undeserved wages. We were heading for a meltdown, we would've been forced to sell players at huge knock downs because of their wages and I really dread to think what would've happened after that. Leeds, Leeds, blah blah blah. I'd rather ask fans of Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and Manu thanks. The interesting point about "average players" - or maybe not interesting anymore at all - is that you STILL after all this time fail to realise that signing "average" players is the fault of the manager not the board who are simply backing their appointment. And we haven't had such a disastrous last 15 years for the money anyway. I've nowt against "getting moneys worth" but who exactly do you think is going to make this judgement BEFORE signing the players. I presume you do think that Ashley will trust his own managerial appointments or do you think he will veto Keegans signings if he isn't happy with them ? One minute these signings are "average" players, the next they are "trophy" players. Make your mind up. Edited June 28, 2008 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30638 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 As I have said countless times in the past, I'm not going to get into a discussion with you on the old board as we all know your steadfast views. All I will say is that when Ashley took over the club out debt was nearing unmanageable status, simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 As I have said countless times in the past, I'm not going to get into a discussion with you on the old board as we all know your steadfast views. All I will say is that when Ashley took over the club out debt was nearing unmanageable status, simple as that. its not about the old board, its about the new board Season tickets and signings going well aren't they ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now