Fop 1 Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 I love how Liam starts to act the big man once they have a hold of him He waits then goes for it, then isn't sure the 3-4 of them have him securely and backs off, then "goes" for him again when he's absolutely sure they have. Dunno why he'd go for Noel over Liam though, by far the least annoying and twatish of the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 They sound fucking awful there, like a third rate tribute act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted November 20, 2009 Author Share Posted November 20, 2009 Liam Gallagher has said he's recording with the remaining members of Oasis, apart from his brother Noel, and that he'll release new material in 2010. Speaking in a video interview with MTV Italy, the 37-year old said: "We've been demoing some songs that we've had on the quiet. After Christmas we might go in the studio and record it and hopefully have an album out in July." Oasis split up while on tour in France in August with Noel Gallagher citing Liam's behaviour for the reason behind his departure. Noel, who's given no interviews since the break up, is believed to be working on his own solo project. 'New band, new songs' Liam Gallagher, who plans to record with ex-Oasis members Gem Archer, Andy Bell and Zak Starkey added: "We'll do it in a different kind of way now. I'll try and reconnect with a new band, new songs and I'm feeling confident about the songs. "I'm feeling a million per cent confident that they could be better than Oasis." On the subject of his relationship with his brother, Liam said: "I love him to bits but we just don't get on. "Me and our kid have never been that close anyway. Alright, we were in the band but we kept ourselves to each other, he'd do his thing and I'd do my thing, I've got my friends, he's got his friends." http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/music/ne...00/10003070.stm This should be a laugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3161 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Or shite, depending if your ears work or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15121 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Let's all boogie to the sound of talentless blokey dirge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4256 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Letting the others write songs probably kept Oasis going for another 2 or 3 albums while of course dropping the overall quality but meaning a few decent (Noel) tunes were produced. Of course it may be that without Noel "smothering" them they could produce good stuff but I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Apart from when they burst onto the scene the reason they've done so well for such a long time is, imo, because they're so fucking average/MOR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13608 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Does anyone really care about this lot anymore? They haven't been relevant since 1998 and haven't evolved musically since 1996 and it's depressing to watch them slag off far more interesting and talented bands. I honestly despair for anyone growing up in the 2000s, with the wealth of brilliant music easily on offer (even from contemporary bands), who would call this bland collection of decent choruses and crap lyrics their favourite band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15121 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Well yeah, they've always been to proper music what Steps were to pop. But at least Steps knew when to quit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) Well yeah, they've always been to proper music what Steps were to pop. But at least Steps knew when to quit. Edit: Nicely put Stiva. Edited November 20, 2009 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Hog 488 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Does anyone really care about this lot anymore? They haven't been relevant since 1998 and haven't evolved musically since 1996 and it's depressing to watch them slag off far more interesting and talented bands. I honestly despair for anyone growing up in the 2000s, with the wealth of brilliant music easily on offer (even from contemporary bands), who would call this bland collection of decent choruses and crap lyrics their favourite band. I think so, talking to the odd Oasis fan they seem the most militant of any fan when it comes to people not liking them and preferring other bands who haven't had as much commercial success. Although that might be an age thing, being at secondary school through the mid to late nineties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6829 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Apart from when they burst onto the scene the reason they've done so well for such a long time is, imo, because they're so fucking average/MOR. That doesnt make sense Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13608 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Apart from when they burst onto the scene the reason they've done so well for such a long time is, imo, because they're so fucking average/MOR. That doesnt make sense Alex People at large lap up the mediocre is what he's saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Castell 0 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Indeed, look at the success of Coldplay and U2 over recent years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15121 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Indeed. The "Oasis = Steps" comparison holds water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Castell 0 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 I have the mental picture of the Gallaghers doing the video for that cover of tragedy now. The first couple of albums were great, but they have just stuck with the same sound and style of song writing. Muse, David Bowie etc. can and have evolved from album to album whereas Oasis went stale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14001 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Can were fucking mental though so it mightn't have been a natural evolution as opposed to just losing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now