Jump to content

Entering the USA


ewerk
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

e-werk will be logging on from Mexico next after his latest attempt to enter the land of freedom is thwarted by a low tech passport.

 

Sure this is correct, my Irish mate ended up not going to the US as he had an old style passport. Not sure tbh but i remember them changing the rules a couple of years ago and i had just had mine renewed so i was alright. It has to have a barcode swipe thing on or they wont let you on the plane.

 

Wait and see i guess.

Edited by ChezGiven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

e-werk will be logging on from Mexico next after his latest attempt to enter the land of freedom is thwarted by a low tech passport.

 

Sure this is correct, my Irish mate ended up not going to the US as he had an old style passport. Not sure tbh but i remember them changing the rules a couple of years ago and i had just had mine renewed so i was alright. It has to have a barcode swipe thing on or they wont let you on the plane.

 

Wait and see i guess.

 

I wonder if he'll have web access at Gauantanamo. ;):aye:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you'll find that I have voice my opinions on a lot of subjects which are contrary to the majority held position. But, alas that doesn't back up your preposterous claim.

 

The reason I appear late in the thread is because I don't generally post at the the same time as the argument occurs.

 

 

 

 

p.s. Meenzer? check the time of the post. :aye:

 

;):rolleyes:

 

if you're having trouble understanding I suppose I could try to simplify it...

 

You claimed I wait until it's safe before adding my two cents, I'm saying I don't wait, I'm simply not at the computer when the discussion takes place. As is backed up by this post, once again, late to the party.

 

Aye it looks like a bear, it smells like a bear, it feels like a bear.......... but it's really an antique edwardian chaise longue. :icon_lol:

 

 

 

 

 

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

Everyone needs a villain, I guess, I don't mind my role now I've got used to it (just need to complete my hollowed out volcano lair). :jesuswept:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Patrokles
tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

 

;) Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Patrokles
tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

Don't really see how what you're accusing people (presumably Fish amongst others) is very different to the way you and plenty others treat Thompers. Not especially undeserved in either case I suppose.

 

It's entirely different, to be fair. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

 

;) Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again.

 

You know damn well that Fop gets on everyone's tits and the stick he gets is far from undeserved. Several people have been engaged in the long, drawn out and utterly doomed arguements of the sort you've seen in this thread. You just posted what you did to be "different". For a change.

 

And stop playing the victim card, I hardly ever comment on anything from you these days. If I do it's because you post like the above, trying to assume some sort of moral and intellectual high ground. The irony of you crying hypocrisy then following it with your comments about Sammy is fucking hilarious. :aye:

 

Oh and to refer to the seemingly obligatory reference when having a pop at me, I'm only going to be a 'wannabe' for another three days, but thanks for caring. You and Fop must have quite dull jobs to be constantly talking about one I don't even do yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drat, no matter what I'm typing here, it'll be messageboard coawrdice because I've appeared later than Fop's post...

 

and no Patrokles, I'm not giving Fop any more stick than I think his posts deserve. I get my fair share of stick and (if you'll note) don't bitch and whine about it, if Fop truly felt aggrieved, I'm sure he'd have said so.

 

One theory might be that in supporting him, you aim to reclaim the Award for Fancy and Whimsy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

 

;) Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again.

 

I happened to express a moderate opinion in response to Fop's trademark hysteria. If you see that as arrogance then fair enough tbh. Personally, I would say a more compelling example of arrogance would be the unsolicited testimonials on your website.

 

For the record I think you take yourself remarkably seriously and have a bit of an over inflated opinion of yourself. Examples of this would be the fact I know anything at all about your "successful relationship" status and the fact that you earn more than certain posters you don't like (I think the lad might have worked in a supermarket or summat). Apparently though this vision of success gets very easily threatened, at which point you come across as a bit of a delicate flower and your posting style becomes distinctly defensive and/or precious. For some reason I get the distinct impression that Luke threatens you.

 

Alex called it right with the Thompers/hypocrite observation btw. You are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

 

;) Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again.

:icon_lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I happened to express a moderate opinion in response to Fop's trademark hysteria.

 

 

Or in fact as that should read:

 

I happened to express a wrong opinion in response to Fop's arguement, which was backed up with examples. I then tried to pretend "hysteria" was involved when I realised how utterly wrong I was.

 

But of course the truth and lawyers are rarely seen in the same sentence. :aye:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

 

:blink: Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again.

:icon_lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I happened to express a moderate opinion in response to Fop's trademark hysteria.

 

 

Or in fact as that should read:

 

I happened to express a wrong opinion in response to Fop's arguement, which was backed up with examples. I then tried to pretend "hysteria" was involved when I realised how utterly wrong I was.

 

But of course the truth and lawyers are rarely seen in the same sentence. :P

 

You clueless embarrasment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tbh I think Fop gets a lot of undeserved stick on here and a lot of it comes from what genuinely is a form of message board cowardice, funny as the notion may seem. In this case, it's people who may or may not be popular themselves who gang up on Fop as an easy target.

 

More contrary bollocks from you.

 

Have to agree. Trademark precious claptrap from Patrokles.

 

:blink: Right-o. Utter bumlicking hypocrisy. First off you have the overly sensitive wannabe doctor who deliberately attacks my posts at every opportunity because of one off-hand remark I once made, and then you have the scally lawyer who thinks he's the definitive judge and jury for this board, an arrogance which isn't helped by his sychopantic clique buddies. Fuck right off, the pair of you. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with, btw, since Luke's label of me as being contrary is somewhat in opposition to the 'precious claptrap' you've deigned to assign to me. Out of interest, what proportion of my other posts have been precious claptrap? Since it's my trademark, I'd assume it to be quite high. Unless you're talking shite again.

:icon_lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I happened to express a moderate opinion in response to Fop's trademark hysteria.

 

 

Or in fact as that should read:

 

I happened to express a wrong opinion in response to Fop's arguement, which was backed up with examples. I then tried to pretend "hysteria" was involved when I realised how utterly wrong I was.

 

But of course the truth and lawyers are rarely seen in the same sentence. :icon_lol:

 

You clueless embarrasment.

 

Now if I were Alex I'd have 1-2 issues with that statement.

 

But I'll just settle for being right instead. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How obsessed are you with 'being right' you massively inadequate cretin?

Not obsessed at all, I just am. :blink:

 

 

Although surely I'd be "hysterically" obsessed, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.