Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Tino was not the reason we lost the league in '96. This is yet another case of saying something often enough and it becomes the truth i.e. 'Tino cost us the league'. I wont say any more as this thread will just disintegrate into an argument that has been done to death imo, but I had to make the point about Tino costing us the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Tino was not the reason we lost the league in '96. This is yet another case of saying something often enough and it becomes the truth i.e. 'Tino cost us the league'. I wont say any more as this thread will just disintegrate into an argument that has been done to death imo, but I had to make the point about Tino costing us the league. I don't know if you read my post, but that's what I said too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 It was other players losing form that 'cost' us the league. And Man Utd (with Cantona back) went on an amazing run. As Stevie said Batty was top class from the moment he arrived and Tino had an impact in a few games (and was unlucky not to get a few assists in the home game against Man Utd - which would have effectively won us the league there and then). I thought Tino was a bit of a flop overall though as he wasn't really cut out for the physical side of the Premiership. Class in the odd game though (and frequently sublime in Europe). Me and 2J were just on about Tino on Sunday as it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Tino was not the reason we lost the league in '96. This is yet another case of saying something often enough and it becomes the truth i.e. 'Tino cost us the league'. I wont say any more as this thread will just disintegrate into an argument that has been done to death imo, but I had to make the point about Tino costing us the league. I don't know if you read my post, but that's what I said too. Yeah, I read your post and was agreeing with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Tino was not the reason we lost the league in '96. This is yet another case of saying something often enough and it becomes the truth i.e. 'Tino cost us the league'. I wont say any more as this thread will just disintegrate into an argument that has been done to death imo, but I had to make the point about Tino costing us the league. I don't think Arsprilla on his own lost us that title. I think it was an accumulation of things, including changing the shape of the team, which was only one of them. Losing Fazackerly, Venison and lack of experience of being in that position was all part of it too. I just think he was a bad signing because over the period of time he was here, he just didn't perform enough. The Sheff Wed game was one game, and Barcelona. I accept your point Stevie that we didn't lose any real money on him, but he just didn't perform enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Tino was not the reason we lost the league in '96. This is yet another case of saying something often enough and it becomes the truth i.e. 'Tino cost us the league'. I wont say any more as this thread will just disintegrate into an argument that has been done to death imo, but I had to make the point about Tino costing us the league. I don't think Arsprilla on his own lost us that title. I think it was an accumulation of things, including changing the shape of the team, which was only one of them. Losing Fazackerly, Venison and lack of experience of being in that position was all part of it too. I just think he was a bad signing because over the period of time he was here, he just didn't perform enough. The Sheff Wed game was one game, and Barcelona. I accept your point Stevie that we didn't lose any real money on him, but he just didn't perform enough. Losing Venison? Venison left in June 1995, our defence conceded less without him, not that that's an indictment on Venison, but BV is completely irrelevant. It had fuck all to do with Tino us losing the league. I've written the games we dropped points on the run in, and none were his fault, although as I accepted above Tino had patchy league form, I'm still happy he was a toon player. He was magic in Europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@yourservice 67 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 I always thought myself that when Fazackerly left we were never the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 I always thought myself that when Fazackerly left we were never the same Why? He left at the start of the season to join hishome town team, who were utter shite in Europe, and were out of defending their title by mid September. Fazakerley's influence under Ossie hardly caused a massive change around in our fortunes. We played some superb football in 1996/1997 up to beginning of December, I don't think Fazakerley leaving had any baring at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Tino was not the reason we lost the league in '96. This is yet another case of saying something often enough and it becomes the truth i.e. 'Tino cost us the league'. I wont say any more as this thread will just disintegrate into an argument that has been done to death imo, but I had to make the point about Tino costing us the league. I don't think Arsprilla on his own lost us that title. I think it was an accumulation of things, including changing the shape of the team, which was only one of them. Losing Fazackerly, Venison and lack of experience of being in that position was all part of it too. I just think he was a bad signing because over the period of time he was here, he just didn't perform enough. The Sheff Wed game was one game, and Barcelona. I accept your point Stevie that we didn't lose any real money on him, but he just didn't perform enough. Losing Venison? Venison left in June 1995, our defence conceded less without him, not that that's an indictment on Venison, but BV is completely irrelevant. It had fuck all to do with Tino us losing the league. I've written the games we dropped points on the run in, and none were his fault, although as I accepted above Tino had patchy league form, I'm still happy he was a toon player. He was magic in Europe. I know Venison had gone before that season Stevie, but I just think that he would have been invaluable in the run in, as he was a natural leader and was the only player at the back, especially, who had been in that position before. I don't really blame Asprilla at all for losing the league, not himself personally. It was more to do with Keegan changing the team shape, and as I said the lack of experience of it all. I think Keegan should have left the team alone and left him on the bench for that run in, to come on if we were struggling like we did on his debut. We could all see that Beardsley, Ferdinand, Gillespie and Ginola all faded in that run in. As Alex has also said, Manu also had a fantastic run too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 If we had bought Hutton and Woodgate we could take a couple of points from Man.U. hmm ...I know we're playing the long game like , lots of young players (no oldies who won't come here) but I'm still hoping for the instant grantification like kev. Good post. IMO we should have gone the extra mile to sign both these players Don't suppose it will change some "opinions" that the clubs current transfer policy of bringing in 17 year old kids and hoping to gain success on the cheap is the way to go instead. Mind boggling. Still, Alex Ferguson has spent a lot of money, as have the other trophy winning clubs, but I'm sure those who agree that buying cheap shite is the way forward What does this post even mean? You're like an alcoholic bum arguing with an invisible foe. B) Your username betrays your lack of judgement and intelligence, if you think that THAT tosser justified his fee and being brought to the club. Keegan only made a few mistakes, but he was one of the biggest. So, there's only one idiot here, but as with other people, I don't expect you to understand the point. Its fairly simple really. Are you happy with last summers transfers and running the club as a "business". If you are, stop fuckin moaning about the league position, which may get worse. I can't believe what I've put in bold. Tino definitely wasn't always brilliant in the league but he did contribute. In Europe he was nothing short of sensational, not just once or twice, nearly every game. One of the biggest MYTHS about NUFC which is often mentioned is "Tino and Batty lost us the league" * Batty was our best player from when he joined to the end of the season * The rot had set in before they came, dropping points against relegated Man City, and humiliated by a piss poor West Ham * Tino was one of the best players on the pitch at Anfield * He scored a fantastic goal in the game against West Ham at home * He wasn't to blame for our pressing the self destruct button with THREE minutes to go at Blackburn * He was superb at Anfield * He didn't play in the game at Highbury * He came off the bench to set up Ferdinand's winner at home to Spurs, and our equaliser at Boro Those are facts, yet how many people do you hear say "Fuckin Tino cost us the league". I've admitted over his 22 months at the toon his league form could be patchy, but he cost 7m and we sold him for 6.5m, so we didn't lose anything, and he gave me the best night of my toon supporting life against Barcelona, and was utterly world class in other games like against Metz. If you remember as well, when SLF fucked off and Shearer got injured, Tino started the season up front on his own and looked like he was relishing it with a magnificent performance and brace against Sheff Wed. All in all, Tino was up there with the most skillful players the Premiership has ever seen, he was an utter joy to watch at times, and I'm honoured to say we had him for a little while. Lovely read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 We lost the league because to many of our players couldn't handle the pressure, simple as. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassplayerjj 0 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 After the Scotland - Italy game I thought Hutton was the Scottish Cafu and he could also make himself a handful in the air, gutted he went to Spurs. However, as someone said earlier in the post we have the mighty Beye and he has been immense after a shaky start, can't wait for him to get back in the side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 We lost the league because to many of our players couldn't handle the pressure, simple as. Loads of things happened. Sir Les wasn't on the same level as when we first signed him, Gillespies injury as well was a major factor as it unbalanced the team and he never looked as good that season when he came back. I don't think Rob Lee scored for a few months as well. So many things at the end of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 We lost the league because to many of our players couldn't handle the pressure, simple as. Loads of things happened. Sir Les wasn't on the same level as when we first signed him, Gillespies injury as well was a major factor as it unbalanced the team and he never looked as good that season when he came back. I don't think Rob Lee scored for a few months as well. So many things at the end of the day. All stems back to the pressure they could see KK was under imo. Seem to remember SLF missing a few one on ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 We lost the league because to many of our players couldn't handle the pressure, simple as. Loads of things happened. Sir Les wasn't on the same level as when we first signed him, Gillespies injury as well was a major factor as it unbalanced the team and he never looked as good that season when he came back. I don't think Rob Lee scored for a few months as well. So many things at the end of the day. All stems back to the pressure they could see KK was under imo. Seem to remember SLF missing a few one on ones I'm gonna make a Season Review compilation as well for that season soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 (edited) Ginola lost form too. Ferdinand was never great on at one-on-ones though imo. Edited February 5, 2008 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Ginola lost form too. Ferdinand was never great on at one-on-ones though imo. Ginola was no better than Carl Serrant, once he spat the dummy oot at Arsenal in that League Cup game, in fact that season from then till the end he was fuckin shite. January that was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Ginola lost form too. Ferdinand was never great on at one-on-ones though imo. Ginola was no better than Carl Serrant, once he spat the dummy oot at Arsenal in that League Cup game, in fact that season from then till the end he was fuckin shite. January that was. Felt for him in that match mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Ginola lost form too. Ferdinand was never great on at one-on-ones though imo. Ginola was no better than Carl Serrant, once he spat the dummy oot at Arsenal in that League Cup game, in fact that season from then till the end he was fuckin shite. January that was. Felt for him in that match mind. Lee Dixon is a nob, always will be, always has been. The worst kind of Manc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Cunt's corner tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stevie Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Cunt's corner tbh. Of Arsenal's back five only Adams is a decent bloke. Seaman - doesn't even send his kids christmas presents Dixon - cunt Winterburn - boring brummie cunt, talks sghite get off the telly you bell end Keown - ugly cunt, dirty, dirty bastard as a player, and cunt (i.e Ruud incident) Adams - good lad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Can't take Adams seriously now he's gone 'cerebral'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Cunt's corner tbh. Of Arsenal's back five only Adams is a decent bloke. Seaman - doesn't even send his kids christmas presents Dixon - cunt Winterburn - boring brummie cunt, talks sghite get off the telly you bell end Keown - ugly cunt, dirty, dirty bastard as a player, and cunt (i.e Ruud incident) Adams - good lad Overly fair imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now