Guest alex Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 sums up a lot about how this country is becoming more and more devoid of any common sense. To be fair Leazes, it's difficult to legislate (literally) for something like this. Well, would YOU have done it ? I misunderstood you. I thought you meant his being persued by the CSA was what you were on about. Well yes I generally did, but I thought I'd try and turn the tables on you I don't think I would do it btw. And I couldn't see wor lass being enamoured with the idea either. Feel sorry for the bloke in question like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 sums up a lot about how this country is becoming more and more devoid of any common sense. To be fair Leazes, it's difficult to legislate (literally) for something like this. Well, would YOU have done it ? I misunderstood you. I thought you meant his being persued by the CSA was what you were on about. Well yes I generally did, but I thought I'd try and turn the tables on you I don't think I would do it btw. And I couldn't see wor lass being enamoured with the idea either. Feel sorry for the bloke in question like. ah, I edited my post but you replied anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RlCO 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 sums up a lot about how this country is becoming more and more devoid of any common sense. To be fair Leazes, it's difficult to legislate (literally) for something like this. If he had done it officially through the HFEA he would have been legally protected - that's the problem, it is now accepted that you have no protection in terms of plain common sense. The CSA is a prime example of this attitude. Like any other revenue collecting organisation the CSA has targets to meet!! My advice to him is to try for some access through legal channels (the courts hate the idea of queers and kids living together) then his payments would reduce, so he could afford to have kids with his new partner. Which then would also reduce his payments even more!! Sounds like the bed-rock for a beautiful father-son relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smooth Operator 10 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 sums up a lot about how this country is becoming more and more devoid of any common sense. To be fair Leazes, it's difficult to legislate (literally) for something like this. If he had done it officially through the HFEA he would have been legally protected - that's the problem, it is now accepted that you have no protection in terms of plain common sense. The CSA is a prime example of this attitude. Like any other revenue collecting organisation the CSA has targets to meet!! My advice to him is to try for some access through legal channels (the courts hate the idea of queers and kids living together) then his payments would reduce, so he could afford to have kids with his new partner. Which then would also reduce his payments even more!! Sounds like the bed-rock for a beautiful father-son relationship. Aye bairn'll probably turn out bent anyway, not worth the risk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11102 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Fucking lesbians Nahh, They just hug and go to craft fairs. I'll bet neither of the claw chompers are pretty though, only reason why lesbians have kids is because they're actually straight and can't find a man blind/charitable enough to be them! them breaking up is conclusive proof of my theory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Fucking lesbians The best kind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 sums up a lot about how this country is becoming more and more devoid of any common sense. To be fair Leazes, it's difficult to legislate (literally) for something like this. If he had done it officially through the HFEA he would have been legally protected - that's the problem, it is now accepted that you have no protection in terms of plain common sense. The CSA is a prime example of this attitude. Like any other revenue collecting organisation the CSA has targets to meet!! My advice to him is to try for some access through legal channels (the courts hate the idea of queers and kids living together) then his payments would reduce, so he could afford to have kids with his new partner. Which then would also reduce his payments even more!! Would getting a sex change legally work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 He's donated these dykes his sperm and they've thrown it back in his face. Brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7099 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 He's donated these dykes his sperm and they've thrown it back in his face. genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15873 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 He's donated these dykes his sperm and they've thrown it back in his face. Adequate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7099 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 He's donated these dykes his sperm and they've thrown it back in his face. Adequate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 He's donated these dykes his sperm and they've thrown it back in his face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now