zico martin 95 Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 Robinson aside, and despite the unbalanced line up, I thought England played quite well. didnt create many chances for owen or smith though after richards moved inside though. Big Sam for England! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 England need to build their team around Gerrard tbh Actually, I agree. The point about Lampard applies to Gerrard too. It's either one or the other and I'd go for Gerrard. It still doesn't solve anything like all the problems though, given a likely midfield would then still comprise Beckham - Gerrard - Hargreaves/Carrick - J. Cole. If you do that there's no pace in midfield so you have to go with flyers at full-back, ideally Richards and Ashley Cole. I'd actually be inclined to really bite the bullet and play Lennon or Wright-Phillips instead of Beckham. Unfortunately I can't see the manager dropping Lampard or Beckham, let alone both. Really I suppose England should be happy with their strength in depth there, it's strange that instead they've just tried to hammer 2 pegs into 1 hole instead. But then that might be as much about the teams ego as managers tactical nouse maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 England need to build their team around Gerrard tbh Actually, I agree. The point about Lampard applies to Gerrard too. It's either one or the other and I'd go for Gerrard. It still doesn't solve anything like all the problems though, given a likely midfield would then still comprise Beckham - Gerrard - Hargreaves/Carrick - J. Cole. If you do that there's no pace in midfield so you have to go with flyers at full-back, ideally Richards and Ashley Cole. I'd actually be inclined to really bite the bullet and play Lennon or Wright-Phillips instead of Beckham. Unfortunately I can't see the manager dropping Lampard or Beckham, let alone both. Really I suppose England should be happy with their strength in depth there, it's strange that instead they've just tried to hammer 2 pegs into 1 hole instead. But then that might be as much about the teams ego as managers tactical nouse maybe. If you really want to play them both, I think it can be done. But not both in the middle in a 4-4-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 England need to build their team around Gerrard tbh Actually, I agree. The point about Lampard applies to Gerrard too. It's either one or the other and I'd go for Gerrard. It still doesn't solve anything like all the problems though, given a likely midfield would then still comprise Beckham - Gerrard - Hargreaves/Carrick - J. Cole. If you do that there's no pace in midfield so you have to go with flyers at full-back, ideally Richards and Ashley Cole. I'd actually be inclined to really bite the bullet and play Lennon or Wright-Phillips instead of Beckham. Unfortunately I can't see the manager dropping Lampard or Beckham, let alone both. Really I suppose England should be happy with their strength in depth there, it's strange that instead they've just tried to hammer 2 pegs into 1 hole instead. But then that might be as much about the teams ego as managers tactical nouse maybe. If you really want to play them both, I think it can be done. But not both in the middle in a 4-4-2. That's kinda what McClaren tried initially I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now