Guest Sima Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 (edited) Care to answer my question now? 30178[/snapback] Hey Sima, making some new friends I see. That's irony tbh. 30181[/snapback] Irony? wtf? Some of you need to take english lessons tbh. Bandwagon gathering momentum Edited September 8, 2005 by Sima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Care to answer my question now? 30178[/snapback] Which one? Did you miss the part where I felt I needed to comment on your first post on the thread following your comment on the fact that I had posted in it to? So in effect, you reviewed the relevance of my post in this thread long before I reviewed yours. Get it? tbh 30180[/snapback] Is that before or after you accused me of spam in your first post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Care to answer my question now? 30178[/snapback] Hey Sima, making some new friends I see. That's irony tbh. 30181[/snapback] Irony? wtf? Some of you need to take english lessons tbh. Bandwagon gathering momentum 30183[/snapback] Definition: irony (FIGURATIVE SPEECH) noun a means of expression which suggests a different, usually humorous or angry, meaning for the words used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Care to answer my question now? 30178[/snapback] Which one? Did you miss the part where I felt I needed to comment on your first post on the thread following your comment on the fact that I had posted in it to? So in effect, you reviewed the relevance of my post in this thread long before I reviewed yours. Get it? tbh 30180[/snapback] Is that before or after you accused me of spam in your first post? 30187[/snapback] I would find it hard to imagine you reviewing my fist post until it was actually there, so therefore the latter. Anyway, still think Anelka is better than Owen? Still think we had no intention of signing Owen in the first place anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Eh? Mine was there first therefore you reviewed mine straight away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 337 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Care to answer my question now? 30178[/snapback] Which one? Did you miss the part where I felt I needed to comment on your first post on the thread following your comment on the fact that I had posted in it to? So in effect, you reviewed the relevance of my post in this thread long before I reviewed yours. Get it? tbh 30180[/snapback] Is that before or after you accused me of spam in your first post? 30187[/snapback] Have you got your mega-defensive hat on today or what?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Eh? Mine was there first therefore you reviewed mine straight away. 30193[/snapback] Thought it would be hard to find someone slower than Hughesie, but you've proved me wrong spectacularly by being that person. Congratulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I still don't see your point? You accused me of irony where I said you were reviewing my posts (your first post on here done it). Who reviewed who's post first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Ey Ey Caaaalllm down everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I still don't see your point? You accused me of irony where I said you were reviewing my posts (your first post on here done it). Who reviewed who's post first? 30203[/snapback] Arrrrggggh!!! I "reviewed" your post when you basically said I had no right to post in this thread. You do the math. Jesus Wept tbh. FACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Jesus wept tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Have you got your mega-defensive hat on today or what?! 30196[/snapback] I think the Kim Clijsters comments offended him tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty 0 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Fuckin' hell.... What's next? "I know you are but what am I?!?!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 337 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Have you got your mega-defensive hat on today or what?! 30196[/snapback] I think the Kim Clijsters comments offended him tbh 30210[/snapback] Who? Her that looks like a bloke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15716 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Gol's absolutely right, of course, I certainly do get wound up on occasion. It's just reassuring when threads like this come along and demonstrate that there are always people who are capable of being even more po-faced than me. tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Have you got your mega-defensive hat on today or what?! 30196[/snapback] I think the Kim Clijsters comments offended him tbh 30210[/snapback] Who? Her that looks like a bloke? 30217[/snapback] As me Dad would say, she wouldn't pass for a good looking lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 337 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 May I just add that it was a pleasure to meet Meenzer before the Man U game, and briefly afterwards. I wore pink especially for the occasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Bit mental this like. I actually only referenced Sima originally cos I noticed that his/her post count was sky high then went down and then went through the roof again. And I honestly didnt know if it was a new username for someone and thats why there was such an anomoly about his/her posts. Honest question - am I right in thinking that his post count was re-set to discourage his/her spamming? Sorry if that sounds naive. Anyway...can it be re-set again or taken away completely? tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15716 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 May I just add that it was a pleasure to meet Meenzer before the Man U game, and briefly afterwards. I wore pink especially for the occasion. 30220[/snapback] Pleasure was all mine! I can't believe we didn't coordinate our outfits beforehand though. Must try harder next time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Gol's absolutely right, of course, I certainly do get wound up on occasion. It's just reassuring when threads like this come along and demonstrate that there are always people who are capable of being even more po-faced than me. tbh. 30218[/snapback] You see all the trouble you've caused on this thread? I might be being thick, but I have no fucking clue what Gol and Sima are arguing about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Gol's absolutely right, of course, I certainly do get wound up on occasion. It's just reassuring when threads like this come along and demonstrate that there are always people who are capable of being even more po-faced than me. tbh. 30218[/snapback] You see all the trouble you've caused on this thread? I might be being thick, but I have no fucking clue what Gol and Sima are arguing about. 30229[/snapback] They've lost me tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46028 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Gol's absolutely right, of course, I certainly do get wound up on occasion. It's just reassuring when threads like this come along and demonstrate that there are always people who are capable of being even more po-faced than me. tbh. 30218[/snapback] You see all the trouble you've caused on this thread? I might be being thick, but I have no fucking clue what Gol and Sima are arguing about. 30229[/snapback] Me neither mate. They seem to be talking in riddles that I neither can nor wish to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15716 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I might be being thick, but I have no fucking clue what Gol and Sima are arguing about. 30229[/snapback] Isn't the Internet an amazing invention? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Gol's absolutely right, of course, I certainly do get wound up on occasion. It's just reassuring when threads like this come along and demonstrate that there are always people who are capable of being even more po-faced than me. tbh. 30218[/snapback] You see all the trouble you've caused on this thread? I might be being thick, but I have no fucking clue what Gol and Sima are arguing about. 30229[/snapback] They've lost me tbh. 30235[/snapback] You're not the only one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now