Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Was 6mill a club record for a full back leazes? Bargain basment tbh, I guess your man didn't see them as important as they don't sell many shirts Pistone [4.5m] and Domi [about the same] were signings whose fees/expenditure could not be sneezed & scoffed at, especially in what was a depressed market, comparatively speaking when looking at the prices thrown about for quality & emerging talent these days.......... and let's not forget Barton, the most expensive British defender at the time. Having said that Man United's 'reported interest' in Miguel [during the European Champs where he impressed ie. the Summer when we signed Carr] effectively priced us out the market. At the other end of the scale [fees paid] Seitaridis was a missed opportunity, when Porto signed him prior to the aforementioned championships, whereas we/the board opted to look at him sign him based on his Euro showing. Whereas your man's record [in terms of 'misses' in the transfer market]by comparison reads like a motorway pile-up. What are you even on about? Are you justifying signing Stephen Carr because Man Utd was linked with Miguel in the papers? The lad starred during the aforementioned tournament. It's a rule of thumb that asking prices are raised accordingly - Man United were scared off as well, by a 10m+ pricetag slapped on by Benfica. Remember this is the same club & manager [Fergie] who have had their fingers previously burnt by paying large fees for players on the back of a break-out performance, at a major tourney ie. Porbosky. Ironically by the same club as well. As for the signing of Carr. An international defender with leadership qualities, who was probably in need of a change in scenery, as well as a turn in fortune on the injury front. A justafied & cost-effective gamble at the time, for a player of premiership pedigree. Wenger signed Overmarrs despite major question marks hanging over the player's durability, as MO was still on the rebound from a knee reconstruction. An educated gamble on Wenger/Arsenal's part, and it payed off. Sometimes they come off. Of course the alternative being we could've trowelled through the lower divisions looking for mid-20's 'chancers', players who haven't cut the grade in their respective lower leagues ie. Perch'esque targets. Why wasn't Carr replaced when it became obvious how shit he clearly was then? Why don't you ask the relevent manager/s then. It's their call, are you still a misguided believer of the whole 'Fat Controller' myth. Why slate a regime who previously backed their respective managers judgments when either fullback slots were marked for overhaul, whether they be for footballing reasons - or in Souness' case for non-footballing reasons. Are you calling Sir Bobby a liar like? .............. and did Shepherd pass across a desk & hand a note to himself, with the words 'Michael Owen' scrawled on it, while Mr Souness played the part of a so-called innocent onlooker? What. The. Fuck. The point has clearly escaped you even if it was sarcastic, given the 'note handed/passed to Shepherd, by Souness' originated straight from the horse's mouth ie. Souness. It's a relevant point given there's a belief that Owen was FS's signing, and that our buying strategy [under successive managers] was somewhat geared around FS playing out his own FM fantasy. BTW, although it's taboo given his stature, but i'm more than prepared to question his final two season's management here [and i've put it on record here before, with the so-called 'whys'], and more than happy to admit that the board was justafied in putting a succession plan in place [by removing Robson - 04/05 being his last season] as brutal as it was. The mistakes were Hall Jr prematurely hitting the panic button, and probably not sacking him prior to the 04/05 Summer transfer window, when the board must have had some reservations about his management at the time - as there should have been earlier, in the wake of him setting upa defensive rearguard [playing away from the team's strengths, as he did in the season's opening month] in the second leg against Partizan. That second leg tie, and the corresponding fixture [which tied in with Robson's tactical reshuffle - particularly on the left flank, with Robert employed too deep] period killed our season. So you're responding to something that i've never said, then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wavey Davey 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 This again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 2978 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 If I can quickly add my two cents on Ashley: I wish he would be honest with supporters. But his agenda dictates that he can't be. I think he understands what is expected of him by the supporters. This is why he is constantly dishonest with the fans in my opinion since he has no intention of fulfilling those expectations. I think the dishonesty confirms that he knows that the fans are right to expect more of him, otherwise he would just be honest as to his intentions for the club. If he was honest and came out tomorrow and said, he was trying to get the club on stable financial ground so he can sell the club for a good price and walk away from the exercise with something (ie. money) to show from it, at this point I think people would probably except it. But only because everyone is jack of his shit. Either way his credibility and the credibility of those around him is shot. Hence the angst everyone of his decisions is met with, rightly or wrongly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 (edited) Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Edited February 16, 2011 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time just keep digging Are you starting to think of a new username yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 (edited) Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time Can you two not get a room or something ? Edited February 16, 2011 by Hudson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time just keep digging Are you starting to think of a new username yet Digging what? I'm laughing at you, you tool. You came on this morning with a reply completely unrelated to the conversation, as per. You're the forum's very own joke monkey. You just type random stuff. Like keep digging. Wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time just keep digging Are you starting to think of a new username yet Digging what? I'm laughing at you, you tool. You came on this morning with a reply completely unrelated to the conversation, as per. You're the forum's very own joke monkey. You just type random stuff. Like keep digging. Wtf omg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time just keep digging Are you starting to think of a new username yet Digging what? I'm laughing at you, you tool. You came on this morning with a reply completely unrelated to the conversation, as per. You're the forum's very own joke monkey. You just type random stuff. Like keep digging. Wtf omg indeed (1 more laughing face than you makes me right and you wrong, mong) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Omg what btw? omg I have nothing to say to that so I'll just put this laughing face? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angrysteve 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 (edited) Omg what btw? omg I have nothing to say to that so I'll just put this laughing face? yet another derailed thread....cheers lads! Edited February 16, 2011 by angrysteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 No problem, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 We've angered angrysteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9399 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Comparing signing overmars to carr btw I don't think you saw enough of Carr [prior to his knee recon], otherwise you wouldn't be throwing around such rash statements. ...................... btw we've signed players with dodgy fitness records as well under the previous regime, moves that payed dividends as well. A particular Andrew Cole springs to mind, and his record was shocking on this front before KK signed him. As said before they sometimes come off & sometimes they dont, that's the volatile nature of what is a speculative market. Life must be a beautiful living within the exclusive clours of black & white, when one views life through hindsight tinted glasses. Carr cost us £2m. sigh. The same summer Carr was bought [2m], Bobby Robson bought Milner [5m], Kluivert [free, but allegedly on a good contract which is the name of the game nowadays], and Butt [2.5]. Previous years to that, he bought Woodgate [9m], Bowyer [free], Viana [8m], Bramble [6m], and speculated on the potential of Ambrose. It's difficult to see how you equate such backing with that of the current owner, there is no comparison as to who backed their manager most and who attempted to show the ambition to keep the club riding high. You constantly harp on about not spending money we don't have, then complain that they should have spent more ie in the case of Carr. These signings were, as a group, all players the manager wanted to bring to the club, within sensible and acceptable financial constraints of the club, varying between speculative ones and proven ones to try and stay in europe and compete at the top levels. You either preach sensible spending or you don't. Missing the point completely, as per, comprehension boy you're a fuckin arsehole, no comprehension problems there lad. You're senile and your marbles are so long gone they've been reincarnated into full life spans of 12 different goldfish I'm right and you know it. You don't even know what the conversation is about most of the time just keep digging Are you starting to think of a new username yet Digging what? I'm laughing at you, you tool. You came on this morning with a reply completely unrelated to the conversation, as per. You're the forum's very own joke monkey. You just type random stuff. Like keep digging. Wtf omg In previous years, this week we were 2004 5th 2005 13th 2006 14th 2007 10th 2008 13th 2009 13th 2010 n/a 2011 9th Borrowed from Leazes being dismantled elsewhere (again) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego21 2135 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Today, in Spain, the newspaper tell what Enrique will play in Liverpool the next season and what Vicente del Bosque will call him to the next national match. I hope that Enrique stay at St James Park... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9399 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Today, in Spain, the newspaper tell what Enrique will play in Liverpool the next season and what Vicente del Bosque will call him to the next national match. I hope that Enrique stay at St James Park... Better chance he stays if indeed that happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 We've angered angrysteve That is quite funny tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Fuck, I clicked on this thread by mistake. Feel free to carry on wasting your lives though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Fuck, I clicked on this thread by mistake. Feel free to carry on wasting your lives though. tbf, tooj, your post is one of the highlights of this thread. Apart from mine, of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now