Jusoda Kid 1 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Paying 6 million for Smith is madness imo, where's he gonna play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Far better? I wouldn't say that like. I don't get why people like Emre at all though. i don't think emre's world class but i'd say he's a far better player in midfield than smudger smith. smith would be a half decent sub as a striker but i don't rate him in midfield at all. he's a bit of a liability in the middle of the park and his goals to games ratio doesn't doesn't stack up enough to warrant spending £6m on him as a striker imo. More of a liability than Emre? I know which I'd rather have. seriously? smith in midfield over emre? I don't think you understand just how little I rate Emre. I'd take Jenas back over him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark 0 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Far better? I wouldn't say that like. I don't get why people like Emre at all though. i don't think emre's world class but i'd say he's a far better player in midfield than smudger smith. smith would be a half decent sub as a striker but i don't rate him in midfield at all. he's a bit of a liability in the middle of the park and his goals to games ratio doesn't doesn't stack up enough to warrant spending £6m on him as a striker imo. More of a liability than Emre? I know which I'd rather have. seriously? smith in midfield over emre? I don't think you understand just how little I rate Emre. I'd take Jenas back over him. Harsh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBass 2811 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Far better? I wouldn't say that like. I don't get why people like Emre at all though. i don't think emre's world class but i'd say he's a far better player in midfield than smudger smith. smith would be a half decent sub as a striker but i don't rate him in midfield at all. he's a bit of a liability in the middle of the park and his goals to games ratio doesn't doesn't stack up enough to warrant spending £6m on him as a striker imo. More of a liability than Emre? I know which I'd rather have. Only because you predicted we were going to sign Smith about a million years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22513 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Far better? I wouldn't say that like. I don't get why people like Emre at all though. i don't think emre's world class but i'd say he's a far better player in midfield than smudger smith. smith would be a half decent sub as a striker but i don't rate him in midfield at all. he's a bit of a liability in the middle of the park and his goals to games ratio doesn't doesn't stack up enough to warrant spending £6m on him as a striker imo. More of a liability than Emre? I know which I'd rather have. seriously? smith in midfield over emre? I don't think you understand just how little I rate Emre. I'd take Jenas back over him. i don't think emre has benefited from playing alongside parker during his time here. he might surprise a few people under a new manager and alongside different players. even if his performance levels don't rise too much, he's got to be a better bet than smith - who looks pretty poor in midfield - and jenas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Far better? I wouldn't say that like. I don't get why people like Emre at all though. i don't think emre's world class but i'd say he's a far better player in midfield than smudger smith. smith would be a half decent sub as a striker but i don't rate him in midfield at all. he's a bit of a liability in the middle of the park and his goals to games ratio doesn't doesn't stack up enough to warrant spending £6m on him as a striker imo. More of a liability than Emre? I know which I'd rather have. seriously? smith in midfield over emre? I don't think you understand just how little I rate Emre. I'd take Jenas back over him. i don't think emre has benefited from playing alongside parker during his time here. he might surprise a few people under a new manager and alongside different players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1321 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Smith isnt a midfielder. If any, his better position is as a support striker. Might work well with Owen. Still not a priority though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Far better? I wouldn't say that like. I don't get why people like Emre at all though. i don't think emre's world class but i'd say he's a far better player in midfield than smudger smith. smith would be a half decent sub as a striker but i don't rate him in midfield at all. he's a bit of a liability in the middle of the park and his goals to games ratio doesn't doesn't stack up enough to warrant spending £6m on him as a striker imo. More of a liability than Emre? I know which I'd rather have. seriously? smith in midfield over emre? I don't think you understand just how little I rate Emre. I'd take Jenas back over him. i don't think emre has benefited from playing alongside parker during his time here. he might surprise a few people under a new manager and alongside different players. even if his performance levels don't rise too much, he's got to be a better bet than smith - who looks pretty poor in midfield - and jenas. Agree to disagree. I rate Smith more than I rate Emre. You're the opposite. Meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now