Happy Face 29 Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 (edited) Remember the "Lost" article a few weeks ago? Then last week he suggested we approved of Jim Whites performance. THEY WERE KIDS YOU TWAT!! Now he thinks Shearer won't have a job when he retires from playing and he takes a long time to give no reasons for his ignorance of Freddie the Hutts plans. According to the times The Times humorist casts a sideways glance at the world of sport Bollocks. He's the least funny most clueless man I've had the misfortune to read. Edited September 3, 2005 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted September 3, 2005 Share Posted September 3, 2005 I agree. He should have been ashamed to submit that shite for printing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
80-2 0 Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 Being described as a "humourist" who takes a "sideways look" at things is never a good start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 I've just wasted five minutes of my life reading that drivel. Utter dross. At least there's no mention of a 'source' or 'club insider'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Being described as a "humourist" who takes a "sideways look" at things is never a good start. 27841[/snapback] Which nearly always equals prick. It seems we are up there to be kicked at the moment purely for the simple reason that we got Owen ahead of Liverpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now