Park Life 71 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 (edited) "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." Edited June 13, 2007 by Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31671 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Bring in a Supreme Court and do away with the rest of the wrinkly, piss-stained bastards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 (edited) "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Edited June 13, 2007 by manc-mag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 13, 2007 Author Share Posted June 13, 2007 "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Good, we can push on with constitutional reforms then, now you've removed your objection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 13, 2007 Author Share Posted June 13, 2007 (edited) "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Good, we can push on with constitutional reforms then, now you've removed your objection. What voting for the Lords by Joe scratch me arse public? *Technically the Law Lords also sit in the House of Lords lets be clear on this. Edited June 13, 2007 by Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Good, we can push on with constitutional reforms then, now you've removed your objection. What voting for the Lords by Joe scratch me arse public? *Technically the Law Lords also sit in the House of Lords lets be clear on this. I'm perfectly clear on it....(been googling have we? )...but the subtitle to the thread betrays the fact that you clearly made the wrongful assumption that this was the upper house of Parliament. Nowt gets past me sunshine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 13, 2007 Author Share Posted June 13, 2007 (edited) "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Good, we can push on with constitutional reforms then, now you've removed your objection. What voting for the Lords by Joe scratch me arse public? *Technically the Law Lords also sit in the House of Lords lets be clear on this. I'm perfectly clear on it....(been googling have we? )...but the subtitle to the thread betrays the fact that you clearly made the wrongful assumption that this was the upper house of Parliament. Nowt gets past me sunshine. Which I admitted in good time Sir! The Law Lords are life peers. My ex-girlfriend was a barrister. Shut it! Tell me why you want reform or move away. Edited June 13, 2007 by Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Good, we can push on with constitutional reforms then, now you've removed your objection. What voting for the Lords by Joe scratch me arse public? *Technically the Law Lords also sit in the House of Lords lets be clear on this. I'm perfectly clear on it....(been googling have we? )...but the subtitle to the thread betrays the fact that you clearly made the wrongful assumption that this was the upper house of Parliament. Nowt gets past me sunshine. Which I admitted in good time Sir! The Law Lords are life peers. My ex-girlfriend was a barrister. I've met more judges than you've has hot dinners. Shut it! Tell me why you want reform or move away. Fucking hell man Parky, you wanna shove that in the claims to fame thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 13, 2007 Author Share Posted June 13, 2007 "The House of Lords today delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian who died in UK custody after alleged torture. The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died after sustaining 93 separate injuries in Basra in 2003." The Tories had trouble with the old buffers who held up and defeated some of Maggies worst excesses and again recently they have been a bain in Bliar's side. The may kip in the afternoons and drink gallons of tea, but more often that not they know right from wrong and vote as such. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2101835,00.html "In a four-to-one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops in Iraq. They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker." This is the court, not the upper chamber of Parliament. Sorry Law Lords. Got a bit carried away there. Good, we can push on with constitutional reforms then, now you've removed your objection. What voting for the Lords by Joe scratch me arse public? *Technically the Law Lords also sit in the House of Lords lets be clear on this. I'm perfectly clear on it....(been googling have we? )...but the subtitle to the thread betrays the fact that you clearly made the wrongful assumption that this was the upper house of Parliament. Nowt gets past me sunshine. Which I admitted in good time Sir! The Law Lords are life peers. My ex-girlfriend was a barrister. I've met more judges than you've has hot dinners. Shut it! Tell me why you want reform or move away. Fucking hell man Parky, you wanna shove that in the claims to fame thread! Human rights barristers and civil appeal barristers aren't great shakes tbh. I did drink with Mike Mansfield a couple of times. And gave him a run for his money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Mike Mansfield is a complete cock end. And I could easily defend that comment in a libel court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 13, 2007 Author Share Posted June 13, 2007 Mike Mansfield is a complete cock end. And I could easily defend that comment in a libel court. Might be an expensive experience fella. Well I think the Lords are great and we should keep it as it is.....A second house full of nutters who are unpredicatable with a keen sense of fair play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 The House of Lords should never been reformed iyam. It flies in the face of what I believe in but it worked. Nowt to with what Parky was on about obviously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 The House of Lords should never been reformed iyam. It flies in the face of what I believe in but it worked. Nowt to with what Parky was on about obviously Aye, agree with that tbf. Ideologically I think it's an abomination but in terms of performing the function it's actually pretty sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 14, 2007 Author Share Posted June 14, 2007 The House of Lords should never been reformed iyam. It flies in the face of what I believe in but it worked. Nowt to with what Parky was on about obviously Aye, agree with that tbf. Ideologically I think it's an abomination but in terms of performing the function it's actually pretty sound. You don't have to agree just cause Alex does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 The House of Lords should never been reformed iyam. It flies in the face of what I believe in but it worked. Nowt to with what Parky was on about obviously Aye, agree with that tbf. Ideologically I think it's an abomination but in terms of performing the function it's actually pretty sound. You don't have to agree just cause Alex does. He normally pulls me up when I'm talking shite so he I must have made a decent point there. I bet you're gutted you've lost your birthright btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted June 14, 2007 Author Share Posted June 14, 2007 (edited) The House of Lords should never been reformed iyam. It flies in the face of what I believe in but it worked. Nowt to with what Parky was on about obviously Aye, agree with that tbf. Ideologically I think it's an abomination but in terms of performing the function it's actually pretty sound. You don't have to agree just cause Alex does. He normally pulls me up when I'm talking shite so he I must have made a decent point there. I bet you're gutted you've lost your birthright btw. Don't follow. EDIT: Just got it, bit slow this morning. Edited June 14, 2007 by Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now