Jump to content

England V Windies


paddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

starts today at Lords, still waiting team news but Harmy wins his 50th international cap if he plays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No-one seems to care apart from me but what the hell, I can vent my spleen:

 

Another over cautious declaration from Strauss. On the strength of our piss poor bowling yesterday, with what looks like only one effective wicket taker in Panesar, how are we going to bowl them out tomorrow, especially if we've batted them out of the game? Better to have an hour at them tonight, rather than three overs, and give them a target they could concievebly get, so they'll go for their shots a bit more and we've got more chance of getting them out.

 

Honestly, why they don't make me England coach I'll never fucking know.

Edited by luckyluke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

starts today at Lords, still waiting team news but Harmy wins his 50th international cap if he plays

 

40 caps too many IMO. :blink:

 

They had a break down of his success on 5 Live yesterday. They listed his average and the number of wickets taken in 10 match periods. 1-10, 21-30, 31-40 and 41-50 he took about 30 wickets at 30-35. 11-20 he took just under 60 at about 19.

 

Probably about 30 caps too many. <_<

 

Wasim Jaffer is rubbish. First player to get a pair against Bangladesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

starts today at Lords, still waiting team news but Harmy wins his 50th international cap if he plays

 

40 caps too many IMO. :D

 

They had a break down of his success on 5 Live yesterday. They listed his average and the number of wickets taken in 10 match periods. 1-10, 21-30, 31-40 and 41-50 he took about 30 wickets at 30-35. 11-20 he took just under 60 at about 19.

 

Probably about 30 caps too many. ;)

 

Wasim Jaffer is rubbish. First player to get a pair against Bangladesh.

 

I was going by the "one good game in five" theory. Either way, he's fucking shit. We were never going to win the Ashes after we made the mistake of letting the useless prick "bowl" the first ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.