adios 717 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) I have to say I think alex is right here. Normally when you talk about tactics with football managers you mean on the pitch. It's to do with the context you see. If I started going on about tactics in the context of Rommel and Montgomery you'd be very unlikely to think I was referring to the football tactics of the yearly officer's 5-a-side now would you? Edited August 31, 2005 by DotBum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Well, he got rid of them (Bellamy and Robert) arguable for a fraction of what they were worth and to the detriment of the team in the second half of last season. It probably even cost us the chance of winning the UEFA Cup. If you call that tactically astute... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 I have to say I think alex is right here. Normally when you talk about tactics with football managers you mean on the pitch. It's to do with the context you see. If I started going on about tactics in the context of Rommel and Montgomery you'd be very unlikely to think I was referring to the football tactics of the yearly officer's 5-a-side now would you? 24831[/snapback] Honestly. Go and read my post. It's very obvious. I even differentiate by saying "on the pitch". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9896 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I have to say I think alex is right here. Normally when you talk about tactics with football managers you mean on the pitch. It's to do with the context you see. If I started going on about tactics in the context of Rommel and Montgomery you'd be very unlikely to think I was referring to the football tactics of the yearly officer's 5-a-side now would you? 24831[/snapback] Honestly. Go and read my post. It's very obvious. I even differentiate by saying "on the pitch". 24834[/snapback] Though I think the better term for what you mean is strategy not tactics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21983 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I said Robson's record was superior to Souness's. READ MY POSTS MORE CAREFULLY. You STILL fail to explain why Robson won nothing. 24769[/snapback] As for why Robson never won anything here, I don't know, nobody does. 24806[/snapback] You make my point perfectly. Track record means very little once you join a new club. Let's just get behind the manager and the team and see what happens. 24817[/snapback] Utter bullshit, it means everything, otherwise I may as well be the next manager. I'm not rising to your bait anymore, either you a wum or a complete cretin, either way you're not worth talking to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 I have to say I think alex is right here. Normally when you talk about tactics with football managers you mean on the pitch. It's to do with the context you see. If I started going on about tactics in the context of Rommel and Montgomery you'd be very unlikely to think I was referring to the football tactics of the yearly officer's 5-a-side now would you? 24831[/snapback] Honestly. Go and read my post. It's very obvious. I even differentiate by saying "on the pitch". 24834[/snapback] Though I think the better term for what you mean is strategy not tactics. 24840[/snapback] Ok, I agree it would have saved a good part of our afternoons! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 I said Robson's record was superior to Souness's. READ MY POSTS MORE CAREFULLY. You STILL fail to explain why Robson won nothing. 24769[/snapback] As for why Robson never won anything here, I don't know, nobody does. 24806[/snapback] You make my point perfectly. Track record means very little once you join a new club. Let's just get behind the manager and the team and see what happens. 24817[/snapback] Utter bullshit, it means everything, otherwise I may as well be the next manager. I'm not rising to your bait anymore, either you a wum or a complete cretin, either way you're not worth talking to. 24841[/snapback] Then why sack Robson? His track record should have kept him employed... You are so lame, making your dig then running off again saying you won't talk to me anymore. You are worse than me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I just can't get my head round this persons stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I just can't get my head round this persons stupidity. 24900[/snapback] Track records mean nothing because Robson had a good track record yet he was sacked. Or something, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I just can't get my head round this persons stupidity. 24900[/snapback] Track records mean nothing because Robson had a good track record yet he was sacked. Or something, I think. 24909[/snapback] Clear as mud mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 I just can't get my head round this persons stupidity. 24900[/snapback] Track records mean nothing because Robson had a good track record yet he was sacked. Or something, I think. 24909[/snapback] Clear as mud mate. 24912[/snapback] If you trade in your old car, your new one costs less. Better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) This fits in here. Edited August 31, 2005 by Sima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Weak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Aye, your insults are shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 90 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Weak 24971[/snapback] this is on its way to getting as many posts as the main Owen thread! nearlly. C'mon now kids i think you should be sharing text books this afternoon now. friends again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Weak 24971[/snapback] It's true though. I've got really wound up here but I've still pulled my punches because I feel I have the right to use this forum. If my prescence bothers you, put me on your ignore list. The sad fact is, I probably brighten up your mundane world. I have more courage in my convictions than you. You wouldn't disagree with the herd if your life depended on it. You are very very ordinary. Loser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Aye, your insults are shite. 24973[/snapback] That wasn't an insult you absolute retard. That was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Aye, your insults are shite. 24973[/snapback] That wasn't an insult you absolute retard. That was. 24992[/snapback] Weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Aye, your insults are shite. 24973[/snapback] That wasn't an insult you absolute retard. That was. 24992[/snapback] Weak. 24994[/snapback] Ok, if you must get me angry.... My avatar's tits are bigger than your avatar's tits. Happy now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Aye, your insults are shite. 24973[/snapback] That wasn't an insult you absolute retard. That was. 24992[/snapback] Weak. 24994[/snapback] Ok, if you must get me angry.... My avatar's tits are bigger than your avatar's tits. Happy now? 24998[/snapback] Wrong too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Weak 24971[/snapback] It's true though. I've got really wound up here but I've still pulled my punches because I feel I have the right to use this forum. If my prescence bothers you, put me on your ignore list. The sad fact is, I probably brighten up your mundane world. I have more courage in my convictions than you. You wouldn't disagree with the herd if your life depended on it. You are very very ordinary. Loser. 24981[/snapback] Is that it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 You're insults do far more damage to your reputations than mine. 24959[/snapback] Weak 24971[/snapback] It's true though. I've got really wound up here but I've still pulled my punches because I feel I have the right to use this forum. If my prescence bothers you, put me on your ignore list. The sad fact is, I probably brighten up your mundane world. I have more courage in my convictions than you. You wouldn't disagree with the herd if your life depended on it. You are very very ordinary. Loser. 24981[/snapback] Is that it? 25009[/snapback] Ok, you are goatse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now