FAO Manc Mag

[Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0]

Is he planning to bully them politely like?

[Smooth Operator 10]

Love the way Mancy had steadfastly chosen to ignore this thread

 

 

I didnt see the thread until it was a couple of days old and by that time the author had already seen fit to insult me.

 

 

...I'm nobody's bitch tbf.

 

You great big faggot!

 

Perhaps you can provide some advice now, is there any sort of appeal process or legal channel we can explore to appeal against the decision?

 

If it helps, apologies for insulting you (fingers crossed)

[manc-mag 1]

I don't know if theres an intermediate stage (ie you might be able to get the already approved plans changed by process of continued negotiation), but I imagine ultimately the appeal route would involve something akin to a judicial review challenge. Judicial review basically looks at the reasonableness of the decision. Interim remedies can involve injunctions, which would ie temporarily halt works pending the outcome of the review process.

 

I do not have the first clue about planning law just for the record!

[Meenzer 15898]

Mind, if your garden backs onto the place, the appeals procedure is ultimately unsuccessful and they find out you're the one behind it... things could get interesting.

[Smooth Operator 10]

Mind, if your garden backs onto the place, the appeals procedure is ultimately unsuccessful and they find out you're the one behind it... things could get interesting.

 

Keep your meddling man-loving hands out of it.

 

As for the fucking Lib Dems - bunch of useless arseholes. Pauline Allen Lib Dem ward councillor for Walkerville was supposed to be helping us in our cause but was a complete waste of space - where is Fibre-Optic (Lembit Opik) when you need him. Knacker deep inside a cheeky girl that's where!

 

Mind you Nick Brown MP (Massive Puff) wasn't much better!

 

Fucking hate politics, there were 10 tories on the planning commitee so I reckon it's all to piss each others parties off.

[Meenzer 15898]

I presume your back fence (so to speak) is basically the boundary between Newcastle and North Tyneside, council-wise? Sounds like each of them's happy to shove the responsibility over to the other. Quite unlike politicians really.

[Greg 6]

From what I can see looking at the application they have already made their decision but have not made it public yet.

 

There is very little you can do to be honest, you can try and put pressure on the council but I doubt this will get you anywhere.

 

If the council decides to give the proposal planning permission there is very little you can do. If you just don't like the proposal you have no right of appeal within the planning process.

 

But if you object in the way the development was proposed then you can complain to the Local Government Ombudsman, they investigate complaints against public bodies and local authorities etc.

 

If you have a fair wedge and are confident then you can also seek a judicial review which would go to the high court. To be successful this way you would need to prove that the planning inspectors involved misinterpreted the law and that procedure was not followed correctly. If you want to do this you have to apply to the high court within six weeks of the development gaining approval.

Edited April 19, 2007 by Greg

[manc-mag 1]

From what I can see looking at the application they have already made their decision but have not made it public yet.

 

There is very little you can do to be honest, you can try and put pressure on the council but I doubt this will get you anywhere.

 

If the council decides to give the proposal planning permission there is very little you can do. If you just don't like the proposal you have no right of appeal within the planning process.

 

But if you object in the way the development was proposed then you can complain to the Local Government Ombudsman, they investigate complaints against public bodies and local authorities etc.

 

If you have a fair wedge and are confident then you can also seek a judicial review which would go to the high court. To be successful this way you would need to prove that the planning inspectors involved misinterpreted the law and that procedure was not followed correctly. If you want to do this you have to apply to the high court within six weeks of the development gaining approval.

 

 

Knew there'd be some judicial review angle to it somewhere. Thats where the lawyers get their snouts in the trough of your collective misery of course.