Zathras 296 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Excellent cross from Butt header by Parker, good chance, good save. THa'tll probably do it. 3 minutes added on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zathras 296 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Bramble stumble and handball about 35-40 yards from goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zathras 296 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Bramble now with a crunching tackle on Euell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zathras 296 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Viduka fouled in the centre circle, that'll kill enough time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM4 0 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 This just feels like the 0-0 Boro game of two years ago... all pretty flat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zathras 296 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 0-0 Full time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil 0 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Oh well, there's still the UEFA Cup...until Thursday at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noelie 103 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 (edited) Another disappointing game, another one we should have won handily but we just lack that cutting edge in front of goal. Minlner had a fair game but his balls in were poor as usual. Martins should have had at least one. Zoggy had a fair game and showed a lot of promise for things to come. Bramble was fairly solid but his long balls were rubbish. Gooch was a little shakey on occasion. Butt & Parker looked a little better together today. Nobby had another good game. Taylor was definitely better at LB than Huntington or Edgar. Dyer had a decent game I thought, worked hard. Edited March 3, 2007 by Noelie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 10017 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Another disappointing game, another one we should have won handily but we just lack that cutting edge up front of goal. My major concern is more the general shape of game. We were again totally unconvincing in our overall approach. We can't find a working central midfield pairing and there seems to be a total lack of understanding between all parts of the team. That is something that cannot solely blamed on injuries in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Another disappointing game, another one we should have won handily but we just lack that cutting edge up front of goal. My major concern is more the general shape of game. We were again totally unconvincing in our overall approach. We can't find a working central midfield pairing and there seems to be a total lack of understanding between all parts of the team. That is something that cannot solely blamed on injuries in my opinion. Roeder is very average at this managing lark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Another disappointing game, another one we should have won handily but we just lack that cutting edge up front of goal. My major concern is more the general shape of game. We were again totally unconvincing in our overall approach. We can't find a working central midfield pairing and there seems to be a total lack of understanding between all parts of the team. That is something that cannot solely blamed on injuries in my opinion. Roeder is very average at this managing lark. Agreed, a very flat performance, injuries have taken their tole but man for man we were better than boro today on paper, we have been hampered by injury, now we are just hampered by a shit manager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 How many more times do we have to see a Butt/Parker partnership before Roeder realises they're not creating anything? He should have played Dyer in midfield and Sibierski up top instead of that unambitious selection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 How many more times do we have to see a Butt/Parker partnership before Roeder realises they're not creating anything? He should have played Dyer in midfield and Sibierski up top instead of that unambitious selection. Totally agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Fuck off Scott Parker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Fuck off Scott Parker. Withough Emre or Dyer rotating in the middle there is nothing going on apart from hopeful punts and the odd cross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM4 0 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 How many more times do we have to see a Butt/Parker partnership before Roeder realises they're not creating anything? He should have played Dyer in midfield and Sibierski up top instead of that unambitious selection. Totally agree. Yeap. Almost wish we only had 11 match fit players then at least Roeder would have hardly no decision making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noelie 103 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Fuck off Scott Parker. Butt I like Parker, no quarter asked, none Given, takes no prisoners, my kind of player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 How many more times do we have to see a Butt/Parker partnership before Roeder realises they're not creating anything? He should have played Dyer in midfield and Sibierski up top instead of that unambitious selection. Totally agree. Yeap. Almost wish we only had 11 match fit players then at least Roeder would have hardly no decision making. It comes to something when we don't want the manager to have to make too many descisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zathras 296 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 I thought Nobby was very disappointing. Gave the ball away a fair amount and his balls in were no better than Milner's toda.y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Think Milner is far better in the middle, I'd have gladly seen Parker or Butt sacrifced for Milner. and as for his corner, Jesus Wept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 How many more times do we have to see a Butt/Parker partnership before Roeder realises they're not creating anything? He should have played Dyer in midfield and Sibierski up top instead of that unambitious selection. We seem desperately short of flair & creativity in the middle of the park. Anyone seen much of this Gilles Barnes lad from Derby? Is he a creative playmaker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 How many more times do we have to see a Butt/Parker partnership before Roeder realises they're not creating anything? He should have played Dyer in midfield and Sibierski up top instead of that unambitious selection. Totally agree. Yeap. Almost wish we only had 11 match fit players then at least Roeder would have hardly no decision making. It comes to something when we don't want the manager to have to make too many descisions. I've been saying that for months, the amount of people relieved that Carr or whoever is injured because you just know Roeder would play him ahead of Solano. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newcastlebroon 0 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Think Milner is far better in the middle, I'd have gladly seen Parker or Butt sacrifced for Milner. and as for his corner, Jesus Wept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Not entirely sure we were necessarily better than Boro on paper. They came with probably the best English centre-back around, two genuine full-backs, and the Premiership's form strike partnership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInspiration 1 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Think Milner is far better in the middle, I'd have gladly seen Parker or Butt sacrifced for Milner. and as for his corner, Jesus Wept. I reckon Milner wouldn't be a bad "attacking" centre-mid - ofters more going forward than Parker. He seems to stay too wide for a winger - that being because his game normally revolves around receiving a pass, beating a full-back, then delivering a cross that goes out for a throw-in/goal-kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now