Guest alex Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I'd take issue with at least part of that post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11121 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Fop = the new HTT? I just don't like misinformation much. (and it's not like it is my opinion, it's very easy to read up on this from a wide range of sources, and as I've said it is very interesting too) I'm not bloody Chemical Ali now am I? when I said "Warriors all" I was referring to the Spartans and when I used the term "Professional" I meant soldiers rather than slave conscripts. you shouldn't take it too literally Fop, I already admitted I'm no expert on this what-so-ever. shut up alex, before you start, just shush Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 47553 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 How argumentative is Fop man? If we can somehow get him and Renton arguing about something, we could shift the thread onto a dummy forum away from here, and we'd never see or hear from the two of them again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11121 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 How argumentative is Fop man? If we can somehow get him and Renton arguing about something, we could shift the thread onto a dummy forum away from here, and we'd never see or hear from the two of them again. I wonder what Fop's views are on Liverpool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Fop could bore for England tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11121 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 maybe so, but he'd never steal Leazes crown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 47553 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Fop could bore for England tbh. He's a bit like Albert Logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 maybe so, but he'd never steal Leazes crown. Leazes is team captain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 (edited) Fop = the new HTT? I just don't like misinformation much. (and it's not like it is my opinion, it's very easy to read up on this from a wide range of sources, and as I've said it is very interesting too) I'm not bloody Chemical Ali now am I? when I said "Warriors all" I was referring to the Spartans and when I used the term "Professional" I meant soldiers rather than slave conscripts. you shouldn't take it too literally Fop, I already admitted I'm no expert on this what-so-ever. I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). And I don't think you were doing it deliberately (as a Comical Ali reference would suggest?). But it is pretty wrong never the less, and I take issue with the incorrectness, not you personally. Edited March 28, 2007 by Fop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Fop could bore for England tbh. You're just jealous, admit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 47553 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). And I don't think you were doing it deliberately (as a Comical Ali reference would suggest?). But it is pretty wrong never the less, and I take issue with the incorrectness, not you personally. See what I mean? Albert Logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). And I don't think you were doing it deliberately (as a Comical Ali reference would suggest?). But it is pretty wrong never the less, and I take issue with the incorrectness, not you personally. See what I mean? Albert Logic. Aye logic and reasoning, bane of humanity they are, I'm so embarrassed to have being caught using them. What do you suggest then? Mystic 8-ball and a Ouija board to make all decisions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15898 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). Or "Baghdad Bob", as those amusing and culturally aware Americans insisted on calling him. Easily the worst aspect of the whole Iraq campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I'm green with envy like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). Or "Baghdad Bob", as those amusing and culturally aware Americans insisted on calling him. Easily the worst aspect of the whole Iraq campaign. Well you had to admire him in a twisted way. It takes someone pretty special to say that there are no US forces in or anywhere near Baghdad when there were two US tanks clearly visible over his shoulder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15898 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). Or "Baghdad Bob", as those amusing and culturally aware Americans insisted on calling him. Easily the worst aspect of the whole Iraq campaign. Well you had to admire him in a twisted way. It takes someone pretty special to say that there are no US forces in or anywhere near Baghdad when there were two US tanks clearly visible over his shoulder. I didn't mean him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). Or "Baghdad Bob", as those amusing and culturally aware Americans insisted on calling him. Easily the worst aspect of the whole Iraq campaign. Well you had to admire him in a twisted way. It takes someone pretty special to say that there are no US forces in or anywhere near Baghdad when there were two US tanks clearly visible over his shoulder. I didn't mean him. You've lost me? You mean giving him a nickname was the worst aspect of Iraq? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I'm green with envy like. Aye I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15898 Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I never said you were Chemical Ali (although I guess you mean Comical Ali? Misinformation as opposed to genocide?). Or "Baghdad Bob", as those amusing and culturally aware Americans insisted on calling him. Easily the worst aspect of the whole Iraq campaign. Well you had to admire him in a twisted way. It takes someone pretty special to say that there are no US forces in or anywhere near Baghdad when there were two US tanks clearly visible over his shoulder. I didn't mean him. You've lost me? You mean giving him a nickname was the worst aspect of Iraq? Yep. The Americans giving him a really, really, really shit nickname was an unparalleled atrocity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally 0 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 (edited) Saw this today. Was alright, not as good as I expected really and seemed quite short. The big screen made it much better though, if i'd watched it on the tele it wouldn't have been half as good. Edited April 2, 2007 by Ally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smoggeordie 0 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Saw this today. Was alright, not as good as I expected really and seemed quite short. The big screen made it much better though, if i'd watched it on the tele it wouldn't have been half as good. Saw it the other day - my thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve 0 Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 I finally got to see it tonight because I came to Australia at the worng time. The movie was released here about a week ago because we are behind the rest of the world like normal. There are only two words needed to describe it: FUCKING AWESOME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 I finally got to see it tonight because I came to Australia at the worng time. The movie was released here about a week ago because we are behind the rest of the world like normal. There are only two words needed to describe it: FUCKING AWESOME. Glad you liked it, but could have been so much better in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordieshandy 0 Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 Watched it on last Friday. Well Gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now